BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35175894)

  • 1. Reproductive Character Displacement in Genital Morphology in
    Nishimura T; Nagata N; Terada K; Xia T; Kubota K; Sota T; Takami Y
    Am Nat; 2022 Mar; 199(3):E76-E90. PubMed ID: 35175894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive isolation via divergent genital morphology due to cascade reinforcement in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
    Xia T; Nishimura T; Nagata N; Kubota K; Sota T; Takami Y
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Jan; 36(1):169-182. PubMed ID: 36357996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Heterochrony and growth rate variation mediate the development of divergent genital morphologies in closely related Ohomopterus ground beetles.
    Terada K; Nishimura T; Hirayama A; Takami Y
    Evol Dev; 2021 Jan; 23(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 33245198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diversification in a fluctuating island setting: rapid radiation of Ohomopterus ground beetles in the Japanese Islands.
    Sota T; Nagata N
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Oct; 363(1508):3377-90. PubMed ID: 18765360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of two closely related ground beetle species with marked genital divergence using pyrosequencing.
    Fujimaki K; Fujisawa T; Yazawa S; Nishimura O; Sota T
    Zoolog Sci; 2014 Sep; 31(9):587-92. PubMed ID: 25186930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Genetic basis of species-specific genitalia reveals role in species diversification.
    Fujisawa T; Sasabe M; Nagata N; Takami Y; Sota T
    Sci Adv; 2019 Jun; 5(6):eaav9939. PubMed ID: 31249868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Role of Sex-Concordant Gene Expression in the Coevolution of Exaggerated Male and Female Genitalia in a Beetle Group.
    Nomura S; Fujisawa T; Sota T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2021 Aug; 38(9):3593-3605. PubMed ID: 33905498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The genetic basis of interspecific differences in genital morphology of closely related carabid beetles.
    Sasabe M; Takami Y; Sota T
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Jun; 98(6):385-91. PubMed ID: 17327872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reproductive character displacement in genital morphology in Satsuma land snails.
    Kameda Y; Kawakita A; Kato M
    Am Nat; 2009 May; 173(5):689-97. PubMed ID: 19298185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mechanical barriers to introgressive hybridization revealed by mitochondrial introgression patterns in Ohomopterus ground beetle assemblages.
    Nagata N; Kubota K; Yahiro K; Sota T
    Mol Ecol; 2007 Nov; 16(22):4822-36. PubMed ID: 18028179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. QTL for the species-specific male and female genital morphologies in Ohomopterus ground beetles.
    Sasabe M; Takami Y; Sota T
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Dec; 19(23):5231-9. PubMed ID: 21040054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Male-driven reproductive and agonistic character displacement in darters and its implications for speciation in allopatry.
    Moran RL; Fuller RC
    Curr Zool; 2018 Feb; 64(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 29492043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Extensive trans-species mitochondrial polymorphisms in the carabid beetles Carabus subgenus Ohomopterus caused by repeated introgressive hybridization.
    Sota T; Ishikawa R; Ujiie M; Kusumoto F; Vogler AP
    Mol Ecol; 2001 Dec; 10(12):2833-47. PubMed ID: 11903896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Are assortative mating and genital divergence driven by reinforcement?
    Hollander J; Montaño-Rendón M; Bianco G; Yang X; Westram AM; Duvaux L; Reid DG; Butlin RK
    Evol Lett; 2018 Dec; 2(6):557-566. PubMed ID: 30564439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evolutionary changes in gene expression profiles associated with the coevolution of male and female genital parts among closely related ground beetle species.
    Nomura S; Sota T
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Sep; 23(1):637. PubMed ID: 36076166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Multiple speciation events in an arthropod with divergent evolution in sexual morphology.
    Sota T; Tanabe T
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Mar; 277(1682):689-96. PubMed ID: 19889708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Directional mitochondrial introgression and character displacement due to reproductive interference in two closely related Pterostichus ground beetle species.
    Kosuda S; Sasakawa K; Ikeda H
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Jun; 29(6):1121-30. PubMed ID: 26914395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The evolution of relative trait size and shape: insights from the genitalia of dung beetles.
    Parzer HF; David Polly P; Moczek AP
    Dev Genes Evol; 2018 Mar; 228(2):83-93. PubMed ID: 29423654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is cascade reinforcement likely when sympatric and allopatric populations exchange migrants?
    Yukilevich R; Aoki F
    Curr Zool; 2016 Apr; 62(2):155-167. PubMed ID: 29491903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.