336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35176018)
41. Comparison and evaluation of two exome capture kits and sequencing platforms for variant calling.
Zhang G; Wang J; Yang J; Li W; Deng Y; Li J; Huang J; Hu S; Zhang B
BMC Genomics; 2015 Aug; 16(1):581. PubMed ID: 26242175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Empirical evaluation of variant calling accuracy using ultra-deep whole-genome sequencing data.
Kishikawa T; Momozawa Y; Ozeki T; Mushiroda T; Inohara H; Kamatani Y; Kubo M; Okada Y
Sci Rep; 2019 Feb; 9(1):1784. PubMed ID: 30741997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. DNAscan: personal computer compatible NGS analysis, annotation and visualisation.
Iacoangeli A; Al Khleifat A; Sproviero W; Shatunov A; Jones AR; Morgan SL; Pittman A; Dobson RJ; Newhouse SJ; Al-Chalabi A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Apr; 20(1):213. PubMed ID: 31029080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Comparison of Multi-Sample Variant Calling Methods for Whole Genome Sequencing.
Nho K; West JD; Li H; Henschel R; Bharthur A; Tavares MC; Saykin AJ
IEEE Int Conf Systems Biol; 2014 Oct; 2014():59-62. PubMed ID: 26167514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The distribution and mutagenesis of short coding INDELs from 1,128 whole exomes.
Challis D; Antunes L; Garrison E; Banks E; Evani US; Muzny D; Poplin R; Gibbs RA; Marth G; Yu F
BMC Genomics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):143. PubMed ID: 25765891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. SvABA: genome-wide detection of structural variants and indels by local assembly.
Wala JA; Bandopadhayay P; Greenwald NF; O'Rourke R; Sharpe T; Stewart C; Schumacher S; Li Y; Weischenfeldt J; Yao X; Nusbaum C; Campbell P; Getz G; Meyerson M; Zhang CZ; Imielinski M; Beroukhim R
Genome Res; 2018 Apr; 28(4):581-591. PubMed ID: 29535149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. SInC: an accurate and fast error-model based simulator for SNPs, Indels and CNVs coupled with a read generator for short-read sequence data.
Pattnaik S; Gupta S; Rao AA; Panda B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Feb; 15():40. PubMed ID: 24495296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Deep sequencing of Danish Holstein dairy cattle for variant detection and insight into potential loss-of-function variants in protein coding genes.
Das A; Panitz F; Gregersen VR; Bendixen C; Holm LE
BMC Genomics; 2015 Dec; 16():1043. PubMed ID: 26645365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluating Variant Calling Tools for Non-Matched Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Sandmann S; de Graaf AO; Karimi M; van der Reijden BA; Hellström-Lindberg E; Jansen JH; Dugas M
Sci Rep; 2017 Feb; 7():43169. PubMed ID: 28233799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Leveraging known genomic variants to improve detection of variants, especially close-by Indels.
Vo NS; Phan V
Bioinformatics; 2018 Sep; 34(17):2918-2926. PubMed ID: 29590294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Performance analysis of conventional and AI-based variant callers using short and long reads.
Abdelwahab O; Belzile F; Torkamaneh D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 24(1):472. PubMed ID: 38097928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. High performance of targeted next generation sequencing on variance detection in clinical tumor specimens in comparison with current conventional methods.
Su D; Zhang D; Chen K; Lu J; Wu J; Cao X; Ying L; Jin Q; Ye Y; Xie Z; Xiong L; Mao W; Li F
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2017 Sep; 36(1):121. PubMed ID: 28882180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. The missing indels: an estimate of indel variation in a human genome and analysis of factors that impede detection.
Jiang Y; Turinsky AL; Brudno M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Sep; 43(15):7217-28. PubMed ID: 26130710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of insertion/deletion calling algorithms on human next-generation sequencing data.
Ghoneim DH; Myers JR; Tuttle E; Paciorkowski AR
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Dec; 7():864. PubMed ID: 25435282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Discovering single nucleotide variants and indels from bulk and single-cell ATAC-seq.
Massarat AR; Sen A; Jaureguy J; Tyndale ST; Fu Y; Erikson G; McVicker G
Nucleic Acids Res; 2021 Aug; 49(14):7986-7994. PubMed ID: 34313779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparison of Read Mapping and Variant Calling Tools for the Analysis of Plant NGS Data.
Schilbert HM; Rempel A; Pucker B
Plants (Basel); 2020 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32252268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. vi-HMM: a novel HMM-based method for sequence variant identification in short-read data.
Tang M; Hasan MS; Zhu H; Zhang L; Wu X
Hum Genomics; 2019 Feb; 13(1):9. PubMed ID: 30795817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing.
Koboldt DC
Genome Med; 2020 Oct; 12(1):91. PubMed ID: 33106175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Indel variant analysis of short-read sequencing data with Scalpel.
Fang H; Bergmann EA; Arora K; Vacic V; Zody MC; Iossifov I; O'Rawe JA; Wu Y; Jimenez Barron LT; Rosenbaum J; Ronemus M; Lee YH; Wang Z; Dikoglu E; Jobanputra V; Lyon GJ; Wigler M; Schatz MC; Narzisi G
Nat Protoc; 2016 Dec; 11(12):2529-2548. PubMed ID: 27854363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
