These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35176569)

  • 21. Optimal Allocation of Water Resources and Eco-Compensation Mechanism Model Based on the Interval-Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Method for Tingjiang River.
    Hao N; Sun P; Yang L; Qiu Y; Chen Y; Zhao W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Dec; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35010407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effluent trading in river systems through stochastic decision-making process: a case study.
    Zolfagharipoor MA; Ahmadi A
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 Sep; 24(25):20655-20672. PubMed ID: 28712084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimization of Ecological Water Supplement Scheme for Improved Suitable Habitat Area for Rare Migratory Birds in Nature Reserves Using Interval-Parameter Fuzzy Two-Stage Stochastic Programming Model.
    Liao X; Meng C; Ren Z; Zhao W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(20):. PubMed ID: 33080931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. An inexact fractional programming model for irrigation water resources optimal allocation under multiple uncertainties.
    Ren C; Yang J; Zhang H
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(6):e0217783. PubMed ID: 31194752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Application of an environmental decision support system to a water quality trading program affected by surface water diversions.
    Obropta CC; Niazi M; Kardos JS
    Environ Manage; 2008 Dec; 42(6):946-56. PubMed ID: 18592303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Optimal water resource management for sustainable development of the chemical industrial park under multi-uncertainty and multi-pollutant control.
    He L; Chen Y; Kang Y; Tian P; Zhao H
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Sep; 25(27):27245-27259. PubMed ID: 30030759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Hybrid Interval-Robust Optimization Model for Water Quality Management.
    Xu J; Li Y; Huang G
    Environ Eng Sci; 2013 May; 30(5):248-263. PubMed ID: 23922495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A dual-randomness bi-level interval multi-objective programming model for regional water resources management.
    Xiao J; Cai Y; He Y; Xie Y; Yang Z
    J Contam Hydrol; 2021 Aug; 241():103816. PubMed ID: 33965809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Economic total maximum daily load for watershed-based pollutant trading.
    Zaidi AZ; deMonsabert SM
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Apr; 22(8):6308-24. PubMed ID: 25487554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Crop pattern optimization for the coordination between economy and environment considering hydrological uncertainty.
    Chen Y; Zhou Y; Fang S; Li M; Wang Y; Cao K
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 809():151152. PubMed ID: 34688762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Baseline requirements can hinder trades in water quality trading programs: Evidence from the Conestoga watershed.
    Ghosh G; Ribaudo M; Shortle J
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Aug; 92(8):2076-84. PubMed ID: 21507559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An integrated optimization method for river water quality management and risk analysis in a rural system.
    Liu J; Li YP; Huang GH; Zeng XT; Nie S
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2016 Jan; 23(1):477-97. PubMed ID: 26310705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A two-stage water allocation strategy for developing regional economic-environment sustainability.
    Li J; Qiao Y; Lei X; Kang A; Wang M; Liao W; Wang H; Ma Y
    J Environ Manage; 2019 Aug; 244():189-198. PubMed ID: 31125870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Water quality trading opportunities in two sub-watersheds in the northern Lake Okeechobee watershed.
    Corrales J; Naja GM; Bhat MG; Miralles-Wilhelm F
    J Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 196():544-559. PubMed ID: 28351821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Towards sustainable water resources planning and pollution control: Inexact joint-probabilistic double-sided stochastic chance-constrained programming model.
    Zhang C; Guo S; Zhang F; Engel BA; Guo P
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 657():73-86. PubMed ID: 30530221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A two-stage fuzzy chance-constrained water management model.
    Xu J; Huang G; Li Z; Chen J
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2017 May; 24(13):12437-12454. PubMed ID: 28361398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Planning regional-scale water-energy-food nexus system management under uncertainty: An inexact fractional programming method.
    Huang K; Dai L; Yu L; Fan Y; Huang G; Xiao Y; Wu Q
    J Contam Hydrol; 2022 May; 247():103985. PubMed ID: 35286951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effluent trading for water quality management: concept and application to the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
    Nishizawa E
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2003; 47(1-6):169-74. PubMed ID: 12787615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Linking trading ratio with TMDL (total maximum daily load) allocation matrix and uncertainty analysis.
    Zhang HX
    Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 18653943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Prediction and optimization of regional land-use patterns considering nonpoint-source pollution control under conditions of uncertainty.
    Rong Q; Zeng J; Su M; Yue W; Cai Y
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 306():114432. PubMed ID: 35026718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.