153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35176596)
1. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for preclinical PET imaging.
Vrachliotis A; Kastis GA; Protonotarios NE; Fokas AS; Nekolla SG; Anagnostopoulos CD; Costaridou L; Gaitanis A
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2022 Apr; 217():106668. PubMed ID: 35176596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The SRT reconstruction algorithm for semiquantification in PET imaging.
Kastis GA; Gaitanis A; Samartzis AP; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5970-82. PubMed ID: 26429272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the spline reconstruction technique for PET.
Kastis GA; Kyriakopoulou D; Gaitanis A; Fernández Y; Hutton BF; Fokas AS
Med Phys; 2014 Apr; 41(4):042501. PubMed ID: 24694154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of Image Reconstruction Parameters of the Mediso nanoScan PC Small-Animal PET/CT Scanner for Two Different Positron Emitters Under NEMA NU 4-2008 Standards.
Gaitanis A; Kastis GA; Vlastou E; Bouziotis P; Verginis P; Anagnostopoulos CD
Mol Imaging Biol; 2017 Aug; 19(4):550-559. PubMed ID: 27995432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
Cheng JC; Shoghi K; Laforest R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the Small-animal Nano Scan PET/CT System using
Alzimami K; Alanazi S; Gannam M; Alanazi A; Aljamaz I; Alyanbawi S; Alotaibi B; Almalki Y; Sulieman A; Sassi S
Curr Med Imaging; 2021; 17(2):296-305. PubMed ID: 33045969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental and clinical evaluation of iterative reconstruction (OSEM) in dynamic PET: quantitative characteristics and effects on kinetic modeling.
Boellaard R; van Lingen A; Lammertsma AA
J Nucl Med; 2001 May; 42(5):808-17. PubMed ID: 11337581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using an external gating signal to estimate noise in PET with an emphasis on tracer avid tumors.
Schmidtlein CR; Beattie BJ; Bailey DL; Akhurst TJ; Wang W; Gönen M; Kirov AS; Humm JL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Oct; 55(20):6299-326. PubMed ID: 20924132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating image reconstruction methods for tumor detection in 3-dimensional whole-body PET oncology imaging.
Lartizien C; Kinahan PE; Swensson R; Comtat C; Lin M; Villemagne V; Trébossen R
J Nucl Med; 2003 Feb; 44(2):276-90. PubMed ID: 12571221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance measurement of PSF modeling reconstruction (True X) on Siemens Biograph TruePoint TrueV PET/CT.
Lee YS; Kim JS; Kim KM; Kang JH; Lim SM; Kim HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 May; 28(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 24504938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Towards guidelines to harmonize textural features in PET: Haralick textural features vary with image noise, but exposure-invariant domains enable comparable PET radiomics.
Prenosil GA; Weitzel T; Fürstner M; Hentschel M; Krause T; Cumming P; Rominger A; Klaeser B
PLoS One; 2020; 15(3):e0229560. PubMed ID: 32176698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of image reconstruction method on dose distributions derived from
Hou X; Ma H; Esquinas PL; Uribe C; Tolhurst S; Bénard F; Liu D; Rahmim A; Celler A
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Nov; 65(21):215022. PubMed ID: 33245057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of different reconstruction algorithms and setting parameters on radiomics features of PSMA PET images: A preliminary study.
Fooladi M; Soleymani Y; Rahmim A; Farzanefar S; Aghahosseini F; Seyyedi N; Sh Zadeh P
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Mar; 172():111349. PubMed ID: 38310673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Quantitative evaluation of block-iterative reconstruction image in PET: comparison of the dynamic RAMLA algorithm and OSEM algorithm].
Matsumoto K; Kitamura K; Shimizu K; Murase K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Oct; 63(10):1138-44. PubMed ID: 18187896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of
Alqahtani MM; Willowson KP; Constable C; Fulton R; Kench PL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 23(4):e13528. PubMed ID: 35049129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise reduction in oncology FDG PET images by iterative reconstruction: a quantitative assessment.
Riddell C; Carson RE; Carrasquillo JA; Libutti SK; Danforth DN; Whatley M; Bacharach SL
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):1316-23. PubMed ID: 11535719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging.
Chang T; Chang G; Clark JW; Diab RH; Rohren E; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5891-900. PubMed ID: 23039628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of 3-dimensional reconstruction algorithms for the high-resolution research tomograph.
van Velden FH; Kloet RW; van Berckel BN; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R
J Nucl Med; 2009 Jan; 50(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 19091902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
