139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35177145)
1. Eliciting uncertainty for complex parameters in model-based economic evaluations: quantifying a temporal change in the treatment effect.
Jankovic D; Payne K; Kanaan M; Bojke L
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2022 Feb; 38(1):e21. PubMed ID: 35177145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of two methods for expert elicitation in health technology assessments.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Jul; 16():85. PubMed ID: 27456844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Informing Reimbursement Decisions Using Cost-Effectiveness Modelling: A Guide to the Process of Generating Elicited Priors to Capture Model Uncertainties.
Bojke L; Grigore B; Jankovic D; Peters J; Soares M; Stein K
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Sep; 35(9):867-877. PubMed ID: 28616775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EXPLICIT: a feasibility study of remote expert elicitation in health technology assessment.
Grigore B; Peters J; Hyde C; Stein K
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Sep; 17(1):131. PubMed ID: 28870196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted podiatry intervention for falls prevention in older people: a multicentre cohort randomised controlled trial (the REducing Falls with ORthoses and a Multifaceted podiatry intervention trial).
Cockayne S; Rodgers S; Green L; Fairhurst C; Adamson J; Scantlebury A; Corbacho B; Hewitt CE; Hicks K; Hull R; Keenan AM; Lamb SE; McIntosh C; Menz HB; Redmond A; Richardson Z; Vernon W; Watson J; Torgerson DJ
Health Technol Assess; 2017 Apr; 21(24):1-198. PubMed ID: 28621259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reference Case Methods for Expert Elicitation in Health Care Decision Making.
Bojke L; Soares MO; Claxton K; Colson A; Fox A; Jackson C; Jankovic D; Morton A; Sharples LD; Taylor A
Med Decis Making; 2022 Feb; 42(2):182-193. PubMed ID: 34271832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a practical approach to expert elicitation for randomised controlled trials with missing health outcomes: Application to the IMPROVE trial.
Mason AJ; Gomes M; Grieve R; Ulug P; Powell JT; Carpenter J
Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):357-367. PubMed ID: 28675302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating Future Health Technology Diffusion Using Expert Beliefs Calibrated to an Established Diffusion Model.
Grimm SE; Stevens JW; Dixon S
Value Health; 2018 Aug; 21(8):944-950. PubMed ID: 30098672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods to elicit experts' beliefs over uncertain quantities: application to a cost effectiveness transition model of negative pressure wound therapy for severe pressure ulceration.
Soares MO; Bojke L; Dumville J; Iglesias C; Cullum N; Claxton K
Stat Med; 2011 Aug; 30(19):2363-80. PubMed ID: 21748773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Health Opportunity Costs: Assessing the Implications of Uncertainty Using Elicitation Methods with Experts.
Soares MO; Sculpher MJ; Claxton K
Med Decis Making; 2020 May; 40(4):448-459. PubMed ID: 32441558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to Appropriately Extrapolate Costs and Utilities in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Bojke L; Manca A; Asaria M; Mahon R; Ren S; Palmer S
Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Aug; 35(8):767-776. PubMed ID: 28470594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Expert Elicitation to Inform a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Screening for Renal Cancer.
Rossi SH; Blick C; Nathan P; Nicol D; Stewart GD; Wilson ECF
Value Health; 2019 Sep; 22(9):981-987. PubMed ID: 31511187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Exploring the Feasibility of Comprehensive Uncertainty Assessment in Health Economic Modeling: A Case Study.
Petersohn S; Grimm SE; Ramaekers BLT; Ten Cate-Hoek AJ; Joore MA
Value Health; 2021 Jul; 24(7):983-994. PubMed ID: 34243842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Role of Expert Opinion in Projecting Long-Term Survival Outcomes Beyond the Horizon of a Clinical Trial.
Willigers BJA; Ouwens M; Briggs A; Heerspink HJL; Pollock C; Pecoits-Filho R; Tangri N; Kovesdy CP; Wheeler DC; Garcia Sanchez JJ
Adv Ther; 2023 Jun; 40(6):2741-2751. PubMed ID: 37071317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Balancing the Elicitation Burden and the Richness of Expert Input When Quantifying Discrete Bayesian Networks.
Barons MJ; Mascaro S; Hanea AM
Risk Anal; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1196-1234. PubMed ID: 34146431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surveillance of Barrett's oesophagus: exploring the uncertainty through systematic review, expert workshop and economic modelling.
Garside R; Pitt M; Somerville M; Stein K; Price A; Gilbert N
Health Technol Assess; 2006 Mar; 10(8):1-142, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16545207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An internet-based method to elicit experts' beliefs for Bayesian priors: a case study in intracranial stent evaluation.
Pibouleau L; Chevret S
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2014 Oct; 30(4):446-53. PubMed ID: 25401304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Eliciting expert knowledge in conservation science.
Martin TG; Burgman MA; Fidler F; Kuhnert PM; Low-Choy S; McBride M; Mengersen K
Conserv Biol; 2012 Feb; 26(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 22280323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experiences of Structured Elicitation for Model-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analyses.
Soares MO; Sharples L; Morton A; Claxton K; Bojke L
Value Health; 2018 Jun; 21(6):715-723. PubMed ID: 29909877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Falls prevention for the elderly.
Balzer K; Bremer M; Schramm S; Lühmann D; Raspe H
GMS Health Technol Assess; 2012; 8():Doc01. PubMed ID: 22536299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]