166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35177543)
41. Application of integrated positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating the prognostic factors of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with positron emission tomography, diffusion-weighted imaging, dynamic contrast enhancement and combined model.
Dang H; Chen Y; Zhang Z; Shi X; Chen X; Zhu X; Hou B; Xing H; Xue H; Jin Z
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2020 Jul; 49(5):20190488. PubMed ID: 32202922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Local recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after radio(chemo)therapy: Diagnostic performance of FDG-PET/MRI with diffusion-weighted sequences.
Becker M; Varoquaux AD; Combescure C; Rager O; Pusztaszeri M; Burkhardt K; Delattre BMA; Dulguerov P; Dulguerov N; Katirtzidou E; Caparrotti F; Ratib O; Zaidi H; Becker CD
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):651-663. PubMed ID: 28812148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. 18F fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma with negative neck palpation findings: a prospective study.
Roh JL; Park JP; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Radiology; 2014 Apr; 271(1):153-61. PubMed ID: 24475791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Negative Predictive Value of NI-RADS Category 2 in the First Posttreatment FDG-PET/CT in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Wangaryattawanich P; Branstetter BF; Hughes M; Clump DA; Heron DE; Rath TJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2018 Oct; 39(10):1884-1888. PubMed ID: 30166429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. (18)F FDG PET/CT versus CT/MR Imaging and the Prognostic Value of Contralateral Neck Metastases in Patients with Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Park JT; Roh JL; Kim JS; Lee JH; Cho KJ; Choi SH; Nam SY; Kim SY
Radiology; 2016 May; 279(2):481-91. PubMed ID: 26653682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A two-way comparison of whole-body 18FDG PET-CT and whole-body contrast-enhanced MRI for distant metastasis staging in patients with malignant tumors: a meta-analysis of 13 prospective studies.
Li J; Zhou H; Zhang X; Song F; Pang X; Wei Z
Ann Palliat Med; 2020 Mar; 9(2):247-255. PubMed ID: 32233618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Contemporary Imaging and Reporting Strategies for Head and Neck Cancer: MRI, FDG PET/MRI, NI-RADS, and Carcinoma of Unknown Primary-
Mukherjee S; Fischbein NJ; Baugnon KL; Policeni BA; Raghavan P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):160-172. PubMed ID: 36069482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Detection of recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy: comparison of 11C-choline PET/CT with pelvic multiparametric MR imaging with endorectal coil.
Kitajima K; Murphy RC; Nathan MA; Froemming AT; Hagen CE; Takahashi N; Kawashima A
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):223-32. PubMed ID: 24434294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. What is the diagnostic performance of 18-FDG-PET/MR compared to PET/CT for the N- and M- staging of breast cancer?
Botsikas D; Bagetakos I; Picarra M; Da Cunha Afonso Barisits AC; Boudabbous S; Montet X; Lam GT; Mainta I; Kalovidouri A; Becker M
Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1787-1798. PubMed ID: 30267154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Improving the accuracy of target volume delineation by combined use of computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in head and neck carcinomas.
Chauhan D; Rawat S; Sharma MK; Ahlawat P; Pal M; Gupta G; Dewan A; Gupta M; Sharma S; Dodagoudar C; Pahuja A; Mitra S; Sharma SK
J Cancer Res Ther; 2015; 11(4):746-51. PubMed ID: 26881512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. PET/MR in Head and Neck Cancer - An Update.
Huellner MW
Semin Nucl Med; 2021 Jan; 51(1):26-38. PubMed ID: 33246536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [PET/CT and PET/MRI in Head and Neck Cancer].
Grosse J; Hellwig D
Laryngorhinootologie; 2020 Jan; 99(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 31935754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Therapy Response Assessment and Patient Outcomes in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: FDG PET Hopkins Criteria Versus Residual Neck Node Size and Morphologic Features.
Wray R; Sheikhbahaei S; Marcus C; Zan E; Ferraro R; Rahmim A; Subramaniam RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 Sep; 207(3):641-7. PubMed ID: 27341273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. The role of positron emission tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in nodal staging of clinical and radiological N₀ head and neck cancers.
Cetin B; Atasever T; Akdemir UO; Senturk S; Tufan G; Turan N; Buyukberber S; Coskun U; Benekli M
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Aug; 270(8):2307-13. PubMed ID: 23283243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to evaluate cervical node metastases in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Kyzas PA; Evangelou E; Denaxa-Kyza D; Ioannidis JP
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):712-20. PubMed ID: 18477804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic effectiveness of positron emission tomography-computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the post-treatment surveillance of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Zhu Y; McLaren O; Hardman J; Evans J; Williams R
J Laryngol Otol; 2023 Jan; 137(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 35086577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience.
Quick HH; von Gall C; Zeilinger M; Wiesmüller M; Braun H; Ziegler S; Kuwert T; Uder M; Dörfler A; Kalender WA; Lell M
Invest Radiol; 2013 May; 48(5):280-9. PubMed ID: 23442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Uses and limitations of FDG positron emission tomography in patients with head and neck cancer.
Hanasono MM; Kunda LD; Segall GM; Ku GH; Terris DJ
Laryngoscope; 1999 Jun; 109(6):880-5. PubMed ID: 10369275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [
Vos JL; Zuur CL; Smit LA; de Boer JP; Al-Mamgani A; van den Brekel MWM; Haanen JBAG; Vogel WV
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2022 May; 49(6):2010-2022. PubMed ID: 34957526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Head-to-head comparison between
Heimburger C; Veillon F; Taïeb D; Goichot B; Riehm S; Petit-Thomas J; Averous G; Cavalcanti M; Hubelé F; Chabrier G; Namer IJ; Charpiot A; Imperiale A
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2017 Jun; 44(6):979-987. PubMed ID: 28050631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
