173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35177560)
1. Digital Morphology Analyzer Sysmex DI-60 vs. Manual Counting for White Blood Cell Differentials in Leukopenic Samples: A Comparative Assessment of Risk and Turnaround Time.
Nam M; Yoon S; Hur M; Lee GH; Kim H; Park M; Kim HN
Ann Lab Med; 2022 Jul; 42(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 35177560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Reproducible Is the Data from Sysmex DI-60 in Leukopenic Samples?
Yoon S; Hur M; Lee GH; Nam M; Kim H
Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34943409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60.
Kim HN; Hur M; Kim H; Kim SW; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2017 Nov; 56(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 28672770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of digital morphology analyzer CellaVision DC-1.
Lee GH; Yoon S; Nam M; Kim H; Hur M
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Jan; 61(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 36306547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analytical performance of the digital morphology analyzer Sysmex DI-60 for body fluid cell differential counts.
Yoon S; Kim HR
PLoS One; 2023; 18(7):e0288551. PubMed ID: 37498851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reliable, accurate determination of the leukocyte differential of leukopenic samples by using Hematoflow method.
Jo Y; Kim SH; Koh K; Park J; Shim YB; Lim J; Kim Y; Park YJ; Han K
Korean J Lab Med; 2011 Jul; 31(3):131-7. PubMed ID: 21779183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Vision Pro on white blood cell differentials.
Yoon S; Hur M; Park M; Kim H; Kim SW; Lee TH; Nam M; Moon HW; Yun YM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2021 May; 59(6):1099-1106. PubMed ID: 33470955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. White blood cell differential counts in severely leukopenic samples: a comparative analysis of different solutions available in modern laboratory hematology.
Kim AH; Lee W; Kim M; Kim Y; Han K
Blood Res; 2014 Jun; 49(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 25025014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Red and white blood cell morphology characterization and hands-on time analysis by the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60.
Kweon OJ; Lim YK; Lee MK; Kim HR
PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267638. PubMed ID: 35476704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analytical validation of white blood cell differential and platelet assessment on the Sysmex DI-60 digital morphology analyzer.
Lapić I; Miloš M; Dorotić M; Drenški V; Coen Herak D; Rogić D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2023 Oct; 45(5):668-677. PubMed ID: 37255419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automated digital cell morphology identification system (CellaVision DM96) is very useful for leukocyte differentials in specimens with qualitative or quantitative abnormalities.
Park SH; Park CJ; Choi MO; Kim MJ; Cho YU; Jang S; Chi HS
Int J Lab Hematol; 2013 Oct; 35(5):517-27. PubMed ID: 23286314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance of digital morphology analyzer Medica EasyCell assistant.
Kim H; Lee GH; Yoon S; Hur M; Kim HN; Park M; Kim SW
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Sep; 61(10):1858-1866. PubMed ID: 37084402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of the HemoCue WBC DIFF in leukopenic patient samples.
Kur DK; Agersnap N; Holländer NH; Pedersen OBV; Friis-Hansen L
Int J Lab Hematol; 2020 Jun; 42(3):256-262. PubMed ID: 32039560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Performance evaluation of the digital cell imaging analyzer DI-60 integrated into the fully automated Sysmex XN hematology analyzer system.
Tabe Y; Yamamoto T; Maenou I; Nakai R; Idei M; Horii T; Miida T; Ohsaka A
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2015 Feb; 53(2):281-9. PubMed ID: 25153399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decreased sensitivity of the automatic white precursor cell channel (WPC) for blast flagging in patients with leukopenia.
Lee N; Jun JH; Lee DS
Clin Biochem; 2016 Jun; 49(9):675-681. PubMed ID: 26800779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance comparison of two automated digital morphology analyzers for leukocyte differential in patients with malignant hematological diseases: Mindray MC-80 and Sysmex DI-60.
Ye X; Fang L; Chen Y; Tong J; Ning X; Feng L; Xu Y; Yang D
Int J Lab Hematol; 2024 Jun; 46(3):457-465. PubMed ID: 38212663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a total hematology analysis system (Sysmex HS-430). Benefits for large laboratories by reducing manual work load and optimizing screening efficacy for pathologic samples.
Födinger M; Speiser W; Karabentcheva S; Scherrer R; Veitl M; Schwarzinger I
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Nov; 104(5):503-9. PubMed ID: 7572809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of Sysmex-UF 5000-BF Module for Sterile Body Fluids. An Alternative for Conventional Methods?
Baran E; Ilki AA
Clin Lab; 2023 Apr; 69(4):. PubMed ID: 37057945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of the CellaVision DC-1 digital cell imaging analyser for differential counting and morphological classification of blood cells.
van der Vorm LN; Hendriks HA; Smits SM
J Clin Pathol; 2023 Mar; 76(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34620610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated white blood cell counts in cerebrospinal fluid using the body fluid mode on the platform Sysmex XE-5000.
Li A; Grönlund E; Brattsand G
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2014 Nov; 74(8):673-80. PubMed ID: 25180445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
