These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

56 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3517807)

  • 1. [Image signals of digital subtraction angiography in a videodensitometric method].
    Katsuragawa S; Ishikawa I; Takahashi T; Yanagisawa T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Jan; 46(1):75-7. PubMed ID: 3517807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Exposure dose of digital subtraction angiography--patient's dose and angiographer's dose].
    Nitatori T; Nishizawa K; Hachiya J; Furuya Y; Maruyama T
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1986 Oct; 31(10):1159-62. PubMed ID: 3540379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantitative digital subtraction angiography: two scanning techniques for correction of scattered radiation and veiling glare. Work in progress.
    Shaw CG; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 3898220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Radiation exposure of the examiner during digital subtraction angiography in the continuous-mode operation].
    Langer M; Golde G; Fiegler W; Felix R
    Rofo; 1984 Nov; 141(5):544-5. PubMed ID: 6438720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Exposure dose of digital subtraction angiography].
    Yodono H; Yokoyama Y; Katto K; Kamata K; Kudo I; Shinozaki T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1985 Mar; 45(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 3892477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of a digital videodensitometric program analysis for measurement of left ventricular ejection fraction.
    Gaux JC; Vuthien H; Letienne G; Angel CY; Pernes JM; Raynaud A; Brenot P
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Jul; 60(715):693-9. PubMed ID: 3304510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital subtraction angiography system evaluation with phantoms.
    Wenstrup RS; Sweeney KP; Scholz FJ
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):805-9. PubMed ID: 3890013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Construction of a digital subtraction angiography vessel phantom and experimental study on resolution].
    Takahashi M; Tsuchigame T
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Mar; 44(3):494-502. PubMed ID: 6379598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A procedure for taking into account scattered radiation and scattered light in the densitometric determination of intravascular iodine content].
    Schüller H; Leipner N; Rollmann O; Harder T
    Rofo; 1987 Aug; 147(2):207-12. PubMed ID: 2819981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A technique of scatter and glare correction for videodensitometric studies in digital subtraction videoangiography.
    Shaw CG; Ergun DL; Myerowitz PD; Van Lysel MS; Mistretta CA; Zarnstorff WC; Crummy AB
    Radiology; 1982 Jan; 142(1):209-13. PubMed ID: 7031761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Resolving power of digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Measurements of opacification with different blood vessel calibers and constrictions in relation to contrast media concentration].
    Schultz E; Fischer P
    Rofo; 1983 Sep; 139(3):296-9. PubMed ID: 6411550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of observer and videodensitometric measurements of simulated coronary artery stenoses.
    Simons MA; Bastian BV; Bray BE; Dedrickson DR
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Jul; 22(7):562-8. PubMed ID: 3305413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital subtraction angiography: fundamental noise characteristics.
    Balter S; Ergun D; Tscholl E; Buchmann F; Verhoeven L
    Radiology; 1984 Jul; 152(1):195-8. PubMed ID: 6374758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Image processing techniques--focus on software. 2. Hardware and software for image data processing. 3. Digital fluorography].
    Tsuneoka M
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1984 Apr; 22(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 6381828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Videodensitometric quantitation of stenosis: in vitro and in vivo validation.
    Seibert JA; Link DP; Hines HH; Baltaxe HA
    Radiology; 1985 Dec; 157(3):807-11. PubMed ID: 3903860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Imaging capability of an experimental digital subtraction angiography unit.
    MacIntyre WJ; Pavlicek W; Gallagher JH; Meaney TF; Buonocore E; Weinstein MA
    Radiology; 1981 May; 139(2):307-13. PubMed ID: 7012923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Digital subtraction angiography: technology, equipment, and techniques.
    Ovitt TW; Newell JD
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):177-84. PubMed ID: 3887480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental examination of videodensitometry of large opacifications in digital subtraction angiography.
    Maher KP; O'Connor MK; Malone JF
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Oct; 32(10):1273-82. PubMed ID: 3685096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A computer and automatic method for the determination of vessel diameters.
    Claessens M; Delcour C; Vandenbosch G; Struyven J
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1987; 30(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 3304101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Digital peripheral angiography with pace shifting and subtraction. Comparison with the standard procedure].
    Hilbertz T; Fink U; Beck R; Berger H; Eberwein U
    Rofo; 1991 Sep; 155(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 1912540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.