These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 351786)
1. [Lower pre-impressions without impression trays]. Klein P Riv Ital Stomatol; 1977 May; 46(5):62-9. PubMed ID: 351786 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays. Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations. Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays. Ishida K Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity. Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles. Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Mandibular pre-impressions without impression trays]. Klein P Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1976; 5(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 794975 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays. Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 19418862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression]. Biffar R; Bittner B Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impression technique for RPDs. A comparison between two methods. Gunne J; Högström J; Nilson H Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 2264016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time. Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Precise mucostatic primary impression taking in the edentulous mandible. Hemi-arch method]. Landé A Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1991 Mar; 45(173):93-9. PubMed ID: 1853750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [How to take impressions of the lower jaw]. Fukamizu K; Moriya Y Hotetsu Rinsho; 1985; 18(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 3903723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]