These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 351786)

  • 1. [Lower pre-impressions without impression trays].
    Klein P
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1977 May; 46(5):62-9. PubMed ID: 351786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: an in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays.
    Burns J; Palmer R; Howe L; Wilson R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12644799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A preliminary survey of impression trays used in the fabrication of fixed indirect restorations.
    Mitchell ST; Ramp MH; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):582-8. PubMed ID: 19523024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M; Ferger P; Wöstmann B
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mandibular pre-impressions without impression trays].
    Klein P
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1976; 5(5):345-9. PubMed ID: 794975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of impressions obtained with dual-arch trays.
    Wöstmann B; Rehmann P; Balkenhol M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 19418862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impression technique for RPDs. A comparison between two methods.
    Gunne J; Högström J; Nilson H
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 2264016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Precise mucostatic primary impression taking in the edentulous mandible. Hemi-arch method].
    Landé A
    Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1991 Mar; 45(173):93-9. PubMed ID: 1853750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [How to take impressions of the lower jaw].
    Fukamizu K; Moriya Y
    Hotetsu Rinsho; 1985; 18(2):213-30. PubMed ID: 3903723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Elastic impressions using custom acrylic trays.
    Tosti A
    Dent Dig; 1969 Mar; 75(3):94-7. PubMed ID: 4886025
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Individual trays for impressions using elastomers].
    Wirz J; Castagnola L; Garberoglio U
    Riv Odontoiatr Amici Brugg; 1982; 1(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 6761613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Influence of impressions' border formation on retention of lower complete dentures].
    Józefowicz W; Tarmas I; Pampuch K; Prokopczuk R
    Protet Stomatol; 1989; 39(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 2701122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of impression tray techniques in microstomic patients.
    Hasanreisoglu U; Uçtasli S; Gurbuz A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1992 Sep; 1(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 1291022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Complete impressions with thiokol elastomers using customized chambered impression trays in fixed dentures].
    Dumont A
    J Dent Que; 1984 Jan; 21():47-53. PubMed ID: 6379005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Three-way trays: easy to use and abuse.
    Pesun IJ; Swain VL
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2008 Dec; 74(10):907-11. PubMed ID: 19126360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of a range of addition silicone putty-wash impression materials used in the one-stage technique.
    Abuasi HA; Wassell RW
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 1994 Mar; 2(3):117-22. PubMed ID: 7920403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.