187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35179029)
41. Biofabrication of three-dimensional cellular structures based on gelatin methacrylate-alginate interpenetrating network hydrogel.
Krishnamoorthy S; Zhang Z; Xu C
J Biomater Appl; 2019 Mar; 33(8):1105-1117. PubMed ID: 30636494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. 3D Bioprinting of Complex, Cell-laden Alginate Constructs.
Tabriz AG; Cornelissen DJ; Shu W
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2147():143-148. PubMed ID: 32840817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Hybrid microscaffold-based 3D bioprinting of multi-cellular constructs with high compressive strength: A new biofabrication strategy.
Tan YJ; Tan X; Yeong WY; Tor SB
Sci Rep; 2016 Dec; 6():39140. PubMed ID: 27966623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Impact of Cell Loading of Recombinant Spider Silk Based Bioinks on Gelation and Printability.
Lechner A; Trossmann VT; Scheibel T
Macromol Biosci; 2022 Mar; 22(3):e2100390. PubMed ID: 34882980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Recent progress in extrusion 3D bioprinting of hydrogel biomaterials for tissue regeneration: a comprehensive review with focus on advanced fabrication techniques.
Askari M; Afzali Naniz M; Kouhi M; Saberi A; Zolfagharian A; Bodaghi M
Biomater Sci; 2021 Feb; 9(3):535-573. PubMed ID: 33185203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Generating adipose stem cell-laden hyaluronic acid-based scaffolds using 3D bioprinting via the double crosslinked strategy for chondrogenesis.
Nedunchezian S; Banerjee P; Lee CY; Lee SS; Lin CW; Wu CW; Wu SC; Chang JK; Wang CK
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 May; 124():112072. PubMed ID: 33947564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Reversible physical crosslinking strategy with optimal temperature for 3D bioprinting of human chondrocyte-laden gelatin methacryloyl bioink.
Gu Y; Zhang L; Du X; Fan Z; Wang L; Sun W; Cheng Y; Zhu Y; Chen C
J Biomater Appl; 2018 Nov; 33(5):609-618. PubMed ID: 30360677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Employing PEG crosslinkers to optimize cell viability in gel phase bioinks and tailor post printing mechanical properties.
Rutz AL; Gargus ES; Hyland KE; Lewis PL; Setty A; Burghardt WR; Shah RN
Acta Biomater; 2019 Nov; 99():121-132. PubMed ID: 31539655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Combinations of photoinitiator and UV absorber for cell-based digital light processing (DLP) bioprinting.
Huh J; Moon YW; Park J; Atala A; Yoo JJ; Lee SJ
Biofabrication; 2021 May; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33930877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Gradient Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate and Cellulose Nanocrystals Tissue Engineering Composite Scaffolds via Extrusion Bioprinting.
Frost BA; Sutliff BP; Thayer P; Bortner MJ; Foster EJ
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():280. PubMed ID: 31681754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. 3D bioprinting of a stem cell-laden, multi-material tubular composite: An approach for spinal cord repair.
Hamid OA; Eltaher HM; Sottile V; Yang J
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2021 Jan; 120():111707. PubMed ID: 33545866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Bioprintable tough hydrogels for tissue engineering applications.
Dorishetty P; Dutta NK; Choudhury NR
Adv Colloid Interface Sci; 2020 Jul; 281():102163. PubMed ID: 32388202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Protocols of 3D Bioprinting of Gelatin Methacryloyl Hydrogel Based Bioinks.
Xie M; Yu K; Sun Y; Shao L; Nie J; Gao Q; Qiu J; Fu J; Chen Z; He Y
J Vis Exp; 2019 Dec; (154):. PubMed ID: 31904016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Bioink properties before, during and after 3D bioprinting.
Hölzl K; Lin S; Tytgat L; Van Vlierberghe S; Gu L; Ovsianikov A
Biofabrication; 2016 Sep; 8(3):032002. PubMed ID: 27658612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Fabrication of a Highly Aligned Neural Scaffold via a Table Top Stereolithography 3D Printing and Electrospinning.
Lee SJ; Nowicki M; Harris B; Zhang LG
Tissue Eng Part A; 2017 Jun; 23(11-12):491-502. PubMed ID: 27998214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. From Thermogelling Hydrogels toward Functional Bioinks: Controlled Modification and Cytocompatible Crosslinking.
Hahn L; Beudert M; Gutmann M; Keßler L; Stahlhut P; Fischer L; Karakaya E; Lorson T; Thievessen I; Detsch R; Lühmann T; Luxenhofer R
Macromol Biosci; 2021 Oct; 21(10):e2100122. PubMed ID: 34292657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Bisulfite-initiated crosslinking of gelatin methacryloyl hydrogels for embedded 3D bioprinting.
Bilici Ç; Tatar AG; Şentürk E; Dikyol C; Koç B
Biofabrication; 2022 Feb; 14(2):. PubMed ID: 35062010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Printability and bio-functionality of a shear thinning methacrylated xanthan-gelatin composite bioink.
Garcia-Cruz MR; Postma A; Frith JE; Meagher L
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33662950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. 3D bioprinting of mechanically tuned bioinks derived from cardiac decellularized extracellular matrix.
Shin YJ; Shafranek RT; Tsui JH; Walcott J; Nelson A; Kim DH
Acta Biomater; 2021 Jan; 119():75-88. PubMed ID: 33166713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Photopolymerizable Resins for 3D-Printing Solid-Cured Tissue Engineered Implants.
Guerra AJ; Lara-Padilla H; Becker ML; Rodriguez CA; Dean D
Curr Drug Targets; 2019; 20(8):823-838. PubMed ID: 30648506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]