These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35179052)

  • 1. Listening to Music Through Hearing Aids: Potential Lessons for Cochlear Implants.
    Moore BCJ
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165211072969. PubMed ID: 35179052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effects of Dynamic-range Automatic Gain Control on Sentence Intelligibility With a Speech Masker in Simulated Cochlear Implant Listening.
    Spencer NJ; Tillery KH; Brown CA
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(3):710-724. PubMed ID: 30204615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of automatic gain control parameter settings on speech understanding of cochlear implant users employing the continuous interleaved sampling strategy.
    Stöbich B; Zierhofer CM; Hochmair ES
    Ear Hear; 1999 Apr; 20(2):104-16. PubMed ID: 10229512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of four methods of implementing automatic gain control (AGC) in hearing aids.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    Br J Audiol; 1988 May; 22(2):93-104. PubMed ID: 3390637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear Implant Compression Optimization for Musical Sound Quality in MED-EL Users.
    Gilbert ML; Deroche MLD; Jiradejvong P; Chan Barrett K; Limb CJ
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):862-873. PubMed ID: 34812791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of different forms of compression using wearable digital hearing aids.
    Stone MA; Moore BC; Alcántara JI; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3603-19. PubMed ID: 10615700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of dual-time-constant and fast-acting automatic gain control (AGC) systems in cochlear implants.
    Boyle PJ; Büchner A; Stone MA; Lenarz T; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Apr; 48(4):211-21. PubMed ID: 19363722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Some characteristics of amplified music through hearing aids.
    Chasin M; Hockley NS
    Hear Res; 2014 Feb; 308():2-12. PubMed ID: 23880110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of Compression on Musical Sound Quality in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Gilbert M; Jiradejvong P; Limb C
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1368-1375. PubMed ID: 30946137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Timbre recognition in Danish children with hearing aids, cochlear implants or normal hearing.
    Kepp NE; Schiøth C; Percy-Smith L
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Aug; 159():111186. PubMed ID: 35660937
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of room acoustic parameters on speech and music perception among participants with cochlear implants.
    Eurich B; Klenzner T; Oehler M
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():122-132. PubMed ID: 30933704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of Sung Speech in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Crew JD; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Trends Hear; 2016 Nov; 20():. PubMed ID: 27837051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analog-to-digital conversion to accommodate the dynamics of live music in hearing instruments.
    Hockley NS; Bahlmann F; Fulton B
    Trends Amplif; 2012 Sep; 16(3):146-58. PubMed ID: 23258618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Verification Protocol for Signal Transparency Using the Cochlear Mini-Microphone 2+ and Digital Modulation Transmitter and Receiver with Cochlear Implants.
    Sousa R; Nair E; Wannagot S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Mar; 30(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 30461401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of Sound Coding Strategies to Make Singing Music More Accessible for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tahmasebi S; Segovia-Martinez M; Nogueira W
    Trends Hear; 2023; 27():23312165221148022. PubMed ID: 36628453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of sound quality perception in cochlear implant users during music listening.
    Roy AT; Jiradejvong P; Carver C; Limb CJ
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 22314920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Binaural Cochlear Implant Sound Coding Strategy Inspired by the Contralateral Medial Olivocochlear Reflex.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Eustaquio-Martín A; Stohl JS; Wolford RD; Schatzer R; Wilson BS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):e138-48. PubMed ID: 26862711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of an Adaptive Dynamic Compensation System in Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Langner F; Büchner A; Nogueira W
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520970349. PubMed ID: 33356927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.