164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35179183)
1. Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
BJS Open; 2021 May; 5(3):. PubMed ID: 35179183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Erratum to: Comparison of short-term outcomes from the International Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA), the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG), and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
BJS Open; 2022 Jan; 6(1):. PubMed ID: 35179189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reporting National Outcomes After Esophagectomy and Gastrectomy According to the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).
van der Werf LR; Busweiler LAD; van Sandick JW; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Wijnhoven BPL;
Ann Surg; 2020 Jun; 271(6):1095-1101. PubMed ID: 30676381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Esophagectomy outcomes between a National Center, a National Audit Collaborative, and an International database using the Esophageal Complications Consensus Group (ECCG) standardized definitions.
Reynolds JV; Donlon N; Elliott JA; Donohoe C; Ravi N; Kuppusamy MK; Low DE
Dis Esophagus; 2021 Jan; 34(1):. PubMed ID: 32591791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. International Variation in Surgical Practices in Units Performing Oesophagectomy for Oesophageal Cancer: A Unit Survey from the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
World J Surg; 2019 Nov; 43(11):2874-2884. PubMed ID: 31332491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Study protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study on esophagogastric anastomoses and anastomotic leak (the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit/OGAA).
Evans RPT; Singh P; Nepogodiev D; Bundred J; Kamarajah S; Jefferies B; Siaw-Acheampong K; Wanigasooriya K; McKay S; Mohamed I; Whitehouse T; Alderson D; Gossage J; van Hillegersberg R; Vohra RS; Griffiths EA
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jan; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 30888419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Textbook outcome following oesophagectomy for cancer: international cohort study.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomotic Audit (OGAA) Collaborative
Br J Surg; 2022 Apr; 109(5):439-449. PubMed ID: 35194634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postoperative outcomes in oesophagectomy with trainee involvement.
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group (OGAA) on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
BJS Open; 2021 Nov; 5(6):. PubMed ID: 35038327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictors of anastomotic leak and conduit necrosis after oesophagectomy: Results from the oesophago-gastric anastomosis audit (OGAA).
Griffiths EA; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2024 Jun; 50(6):107983. PubMed ID: 38613995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. International benchmarking in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery.
Busweiler LAD; Jeremiasen M; Wijnhoven BPL; Lindblad M; Lundell L; van de Velde CJH; Tollenaar RAEM; Wouters MWJM; van Sandick JW; Johansson J; Dikken JL
BJS Open; 2019 Feb; 3(1):62-73. PubMed ID: 30734017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rates of Anastomotic Complications and Their Management Following Esophagectomy: Results of the Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Audit (OGAA).
Oesophago-Gastric Anastomosis Study Group on behalf of the West Midlands Research Collaborative
Ann Surg; 2022 Feb; 275(2):e382-e391. PubMed ID: 33630459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Completely minimally invasive versus hybrid Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy for oesophageal and gastro-oesophageal junctional cancer: a UK multi-centre comparative study.
Patel K; Askari A; Abbassi O; Jayanthi NV; Claydon O; Laycock J; Ramalingam A; Kumar B; Wong J; Aly M; Jambulingam P;
Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):5822-5832. PubMed ID: 35044515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Implementation of the Esophagectomy Complication Consensus Group definitions: the benefits of speaking the same language.
Muir D; Antonowicz S; Whiting J; Low D; Maynard N
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Nov; 35(11):. PubMed ID: 35673848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early outcomes from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
Busweiler LA; Wijnhoven BP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Henneman D; van Grieken NC; Wouters MW; van Hillegersberg R; van Sandick JW;
Br J Surg; 2016 Dec; 103(13):1855-1863. PubMed ID: 27704530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using Benchmarking Standards to Evaluate Transition to Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Carroll PA; Jacob N; Yeung JC; Darling GE
Ann Thorac Surg; 2020 Feb; 109(2):383-388. PubMed ID: 31541632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Postoperative intensive care unit stay after minimally invasive esophagectomy shows large hospital variation. Results from the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit.
Voeten DM; van der Werf LR; Gisbertz SS; Ruurda JP; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Hillegersberg R;
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):1961-1968. PubMed ID: 33485673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Treatment of anastomotic leak after oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: large, collaborative, observational TENTACLE cohort study.
Ubels S; Verstegen MHP; Klarenbeek BR; Bouwense S; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Daams F; van Det MJ; Griffiths EA; Haveman JW; Heisterkamp J; Nieuwenhuijzen G; Polat F; Schouten J; Siersema PD; Singh P; Wijnhoven B; Hannink G; van Workum F; Rosman C;
Br J Surg; 2023 Jun; 110(7):852-863. PubMed ID: 37196149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Outcomes of Esophagogastric Cancer Surgery During Eight Years of Surgical Auditing by the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).
Voeten DM; Busweiler LAD; van der Werf LR; Wijnhoven BPL; Verhoeven RHA; van Sandick JW; van Hillegersberg R; van Berge Henegouwen MI;
Ann Surg; 2021 Nov; 274(5):866-873. PubMed ID: 34334633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age and Charlson Comorbidity Index score are not independent risk factors for severe complications after curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a Dutch population-based cohort study.
Baranov N; Claassen L; van Workum F; Rosman C
Surg Oncol; 2022 Aug; 43():101789. PubMed ID: 35792370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe.
Dikken JL; van Sandick JW; Allum WH; Johansson J; Jensen LS; Putter H; Coupland VH; Wouters MW; Lemmens VE; van de Velde CJ; van der Geest LG; Larsson HJ; Cats A; Verheij M
Br J Surg; 2013 Jan; 100(1):83-94. PubMed ID: 23180474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
