202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35180244)
1. Evaluating the detection ability of a range of epistasis detection methods on simulated data for pure and impure epistatic models.
Russ D; Williams JA; Cardoso VR; Bravo-Merodio L; Pendleton SC; Aziz F; Acharjee A; Gkoutos GV
PLoS One; 2022; 17(2):e0263390. PubMed ID: 35180244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cloud computing for detecting high-order genome-wide epistatic interaction via dynamic clustering.
Guo X; Meng Y; Yu N; Pan Y
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Apr; 15():102. PubMed ID: 24717145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A novel survival multifactor dimensionality reduction method for detecting gene-gene interactions with application to bladder cancer prognosis.
Gui J; Moore JH; Kelsey KT; Marsit CJ; Karagas MR; Andrew AS
Hum Genet; 2011 Jan; 129(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 20981448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comment on two-locus epistatic interaction models for genome-wide association studies.
Sohn KA; Wee K
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 13(6):1571004. PubMed ID: 26260855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detecting purely epistatic multi-locus interactions by an omnibus permutation test on ensembles of two-locus analyses.
Wongseree W; Assawamakin A; Piroonratana T; Sinsomros S; Limwongse C; Chaiyaratana N
BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 10():294. PubMed ID: 19761607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Learning genetic epistasis using Bayesian network scoring criteria.
Jiang X; Neapolitan RE; Barmada MM; Visweswaran S
BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Mar; 12():89. PubMed ID: 21453508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CINOEDV: a co-information based method for detecting and visualizing n-order epistatic interactions.
Shang J; Sun Y; Liu JX; Xia J; Zhang J; Zheng CH
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 May; 17(1):214. PubMed ID: 27184783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ant colony optimization with an automatic adjustment mechanism for detecting epistatic interactions.
Guan B; Zhao Y; Sun W
Comput Biol Chem; 2018 Dec; 77():354-362. PubMed ID: 30466044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predictive rule inference for epistatic interaction detection in genome-wide association studies.
Wan X; Yang C; Yang Q; Xue H; Tang NL; Yu W
Bioinformatics; 2010 Jan; 26(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 19880365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prioritizing tests of epistasis through hierarchical representation of genomic redundancies.
Cowman T; Koyutürk M
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Aug; 45(14):e131. PubMed ID: 28605458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating the ability of tree-based methods and logistic regression for the detection of SNP-SNP interaction.
García-Magariños M; López-de-Ullibarri I; Cao R; Salas A
Ann Hum Genet; 2009 May; 73(Pt 3):360-9. PubMed ID: 19291098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DualWMDR: Detecting epistatic interaction with dual screening and multifactor dimensionality reduction.
Cao X; Yu G; Ren W; Guo M; Wang J
Hum Mutat; 2020 Mar; 41(3):719-734. PubMed ID: 31705708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mining pure, strict epistatic interactions from high-dimensional datasets: ameliorating the curse of dimensionality.
Jiang X; Neapolitan RE
PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46771. PubMed ID: 23071633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Self-Adjusting Ant Colony Optimization Based on Information Entropy for Detecting Epistatic Interactions.
Guan B; Zhao Y
Genes (Basel); 2019 Feb; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 30717303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying quantitative trait locus by genetic background interactions in association studies.
Jannink JL
Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):553-61. PubMed ID: 17179077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A balanced accuracy function for epistasis modeling in imbalanced datasets using multifactor dimensionality reduction.
Velez DR; White BC; Motsinger AA; Bush WS; Ritchie MD; Williams SM; Moore JH
Genet Epidemiol; 2007 May; 31(4):306-15. PubMed ID: 17323372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A whole-genome simulator capable of modeling high-order epistasis for complex disease.
Yang W; Gu CC
Genet Epidemiol; 2013 Nov; 37(7):686-94. PubMed ID: 24114848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiobjective differential evolution-based multifactor dimensionality reduction for detecting gene-gene interactions.
Yang CH; Chuang LY; Lin YD
Sci Rep; 2017 Oct; 7(1):12869. PubMed ID: 28993686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fast detection of high-order epistatic interactions in genome-wide association studies using information theoretic measure.
Leem S; Jeong HH; Lee J; Wee K; Sohn KA
Comput Biol Chem; 2014 Jun; 50():19-28. PubMed ID: 24581733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. KNN-MDR: a learning approach for improving interactions mapping performances in genome wide association studies.
Abo Alchamlat S; Farnir F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2017 Mar; 18(1):184. PubMed ID: 28327091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
