These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35181563)

  • 1. Reporting completeness in abstracts of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies in cardiovascular diseases is suboptimal.
    Pagkalidou E; Anastasilakis DA; Kokkali S; Doundoulakis I; Tsapas A; Dardavessis T; Haidich AB
    Hellenic J Cardiol; 2022; 65():25-34. PubMed ID: 35181563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline.
    Salameh JP; McInnes MDF; Moher D; Thombs BD; McGrath TA; Frank R; Dehmoobad Sharifabadi A; Kraaijpoel N; Levis B; Bossuyt PM
    Clin Chem; 2019 Feb; 65(2):291-301. PubMed ID: 30237150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completeness of Reporting of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (DTA) of Radiological Articles Based on the PRISMA-DTA Reporting Guideline.
    Kim W; Kim JH; Cha YK; Chong S; Kim TJ
    Acad Radiol; 2023 Feb; 30(2):258-275. PubMed ID: 35491344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Completeness of reporting for systematic reviews of point-of-care ultrasound: a meta-research study.
    Prager R; Pratte M; Guy A; Bala S; Bachar R; Kim DJ; Millington S; Salameh JP; McGrath TA; McInnes MD
    BMJ Evid Based Med; 2021 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 33785511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring quality of reporting in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies in medical imaging: comparison of PRISMA-DTA and PRISMA.
    Li Q; Hou W; Li L; Xu J; Ren Y; Zou K; Tian R; Sun X
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Feb; 61(2):257-266. PubMed ID: 36633905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reporting quality in abstracts of meta-analyses of depression screening tool accuracy: a review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
    Rice DB; Kloda LA; Shrier I; Thombs BD
    BMJ Open; 2016 Nov; 6(11):e012867. PubMed ID: 27864250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of quality of abstracts of systematic reviews including meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in high-impact general medicine journals before and after the publication of PRISMA extension for abstracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bigna JJ; Um LN; Nansseu JR
    Syst Rev; 2016 Oct; 5(1):174. PubMed ID: 27737710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Completeness of reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in vascular surgery.
    Javidan A; Alaichi J; Nassar Y; Li A; Balta KY; Naji F
    J Vasc Surg; 2023 Dec; 78(6):1550-1558.e2. PubMed ID: 37068527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Steps toward more complete reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (PRISMA-DTA).
    McGrath TA; Moher D; McInnes MDF
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jul; 8(1):166. PubMed ID: 31296260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses for abstracts (PRISMA-A) depends on abstract length.
    Helbach J; Hoffmann F; Pieper D; Allers K
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2023 Feb; 154():167-177. PubMed ID: 36584734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Adherence to PRISMA-A and reporting was suboptimal in meta-analysis abstracts on drug efficacy for tumors: a literature survey.
    Yan B; Li M; Zhang J; Chang H; Ma C; Li F
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Nov; 175():111506. PubMed ID: 39178995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Otorhinolaryngologic Articles Based on the PRISMA Statement.
    Peters JP; Hooft L; Grolman W; Stegeman I
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0136540. PubMed ID: 26317406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study.
    Innocenti T; Feller D; Giagio S; Salvioli S; Minnucci S; Brindisino F; Cosentino C; Piano L; Chiarotto A; Ostelo R
    Braz J Phys Ther; 2022; 26(5):100450. PubMed ID: 36270163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) and the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published in medical journals.
    Turner L; Shamseer L; Altman DG; Weeks L; Peters J; Kober T; Dias S; Schulz KF; Plint AC; Moher D
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):MR000030. PubMed ID: 23152285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.
    McInnes MDF; Moher D; Thombs BD; McGrath TA; Bossuyt PM; ; Clifford T; Cohen JF; Deeks JJ; Gatsonis C; Hooft L; Hunt HA; Hyde CJ; Korevaar DA; Leeflang MMG; Macaskill P; Reitsma JB; Rodin R; Rutjes AWS; Salameh JP; Stevens A; Takwoingi Y; Tonelli M; Weeks L; Whiting P; Willis BH
    JAMA; 2018 Jan; 319(4):388-396. PubMed ID: 29362800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Association of study quality with completeness of reporting: have completeness of reporting and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in major radiology journals changed since publication of the PRISMA statement?
    Tunis AS; McInnes MD; Hanna R; Esmail K
    Radiology; 2013 Nov; 269(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 23824992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews/meta-analyses: An appraisal of Arab Journal of Urology across 12 years: the PRISMA-Abstracts checklist.
    El Ansari W; AlRumaihi K; El-Ansari K; Arafa M; Elbardisi H; Majzoub A; Shamsodini A; Al Ansari A
    Arab J Urol; 2023; 21(1):52-65. PubMed ID: 36818377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.
    Tam WW; Lo KK; Khalechelvam P
    BMJ Open; 2017 Feb; 7(2):e013905. PubMed ID: 28174224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Quality of reporting in systematic reviews published in dermatology journals.
    Croitoru DO; Huang Y; Kurdina A; Chan AW; Drucker AM
    Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jun; 182(6):1469-1476. PubMed ID: 31529461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.