These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35181563)

  • 21. Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.
    McGrath TA; Alabousi M; Skidmore B; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PMM; Moher D; Thombs B; McInnes MDF
    Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 29017574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. There is still room for improvement in the completeness of abstract reporting according to the PRISMA-A checklist: a cross-sectional study on systematic reviews in periodontology.
    Adobes Martin M; Santamans Faustino S; Llario Almiñana I; Aiuto R; Rotundo R; Garcovich D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Feb; 21(1):33. PubMed ID: 33573591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reporting Quality of Abstracts in Systematic Reviews in Orthodontics: An Observational Study.
    Alharbi F; Alghabban RO
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2024 May; 25(5):459-462. PubMed ID: 39364845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Quality Reporting of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis According to PRISMA 2020 Guidelines: Results from Recently Published Papers in the
    Park HY; Suh CH; Woo S; Kim PH; Kim KW
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 Mar; 23(3):355-369. PubMed ID: 35213097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
    Page MJ; Moher D
    Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 6(1):263. PubMed ID: 29258593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of reporting quality of abstracts of systematic reviews with meta-analysis using PRISMA-A and discordance in assessments between raters without prior experience.
    Maticic K; Krnic Martinic M; Puljak L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Feb; 19(1):32. PubMed ID: 30764774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality of abstract of systematic reviews and meta-analyses in paediatric dentistry journals.
    Pulikkotil SJ; Jayaraman J; Nagendrababu V
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2019 Oct; 20(5):383-391. PubMed ID: 30887462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Research on Research Study.
    O'Donohoe TJ; Dhillon R; Bridson TL; Tee J
    Neurosurgery; 2019 Jul; 85(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 30649511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials of Periodontal Diseases in Journal Abstracts-A Cross-sectional Survey and Bibliometric Analysis.
    Kumar S; Mohammad H; Vora H; Kar K
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2018 Jun; 18(2):130-141.e22. PubMed ID: 29747793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of adherence to STARD for abstracts in a diverse sample of diagnostic accuracy abstracts published in 2012 and 2019 reveals suboptimal reporting practices.
    Dubois C; Dawit H; Korevaar DA; Vali Y; Al Sibaaie A; Frank RA; McInnes MDF; Hyde C; Bossuyt PM; Cohen JF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Sep; 173():111459. PubMed ID: 39004321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. THE REPORTING QUALITY OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEW ABSTRACTS IN LEADING GENERAL DENTAL JOURNALS: A METHODOLOGICAL STUDY.
    Zhong Y; Wang Y; Dan S; Zhao T; Li T; Qin D; Hua F
    J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2023 Mar; 23(1):101831. PubMed ID: 36914298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Reporting completeness of abstracts of systematic reviews published in leading dental specialty journals.
    Seehra J; Fleming PS; Polychronopoulou A; Pandis N
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2013 Apr; 121(2):57-62. PubMed ID: 23489893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Has the Reporting Quality of Systematic Review Abstracts in Nursing Improved Since the Release of PRISMA for Abstracts? A Survey of High-Profile Nursing Journals.
    Jiancheng W; Jinhui T; Lin H; Yuxia M; Juxia Z
    Worldviews Evid Based Nurs; 2020 Apr; 17(2):108-117. PubMed ID: 31883236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating the Impact of Peer Review on the Completeness of Reporting in Imaging Diagnostic Test Accuracy Research.
    Kazi S; Frank RA; Salameh JP; Fabiano N; Absi M; Pozdnyakov A; Islam N; Korevaar DA; Cohen JF; Bossuyt PM; Leeflang MMG; Cobey KD; Moher D; Schweitzer M; Menu Y; Patlas M; McInnes MDF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Sep; 56(3):680-690. PubMed ID: 35166411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current status of the reporting quality of abstracts in systematic reviews related to implant dentistry: a literature survey.
    Moraschini V; Arantes ER; de Queiroz TR; Kischinhevsky ICC; Calasans-Maia MD; Louro RS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 May; 52(5):613-618. PubMed ID: 36220683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Systematic reviews in orthodontics: Impact of the PRISMA for Abstracts checklist on completeness of reporting.
    Vásquez-Cárdenas J; Zapata-Noreña Ó; Carvajal-Flórez Á; Barbosa-Liz DM; Giannakopoulos NN; Faggion CM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Oct; 156(4):442-452.e12. PubMed ID: 31582116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Differences in the reporting of conflicts of interest and sponsorships in systematic reviews with meta-analyses in dentistry: an examination of factors associated with their reporting.
    Heymann J; Su N; Faggion CM
    Res Integr Peer Rev; 2024 Sep; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 39350298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. PRISMA for abstracts: best practice for reporting abstracts of systematic reviews in Endodontology.
    Nagendrababu V; Duncan HF; Tsesis I; Sathorn C; Pulikkotil SJ; Dharmarajan L; Dummer PMH
    Int Endod J; 2019 Mar; ():1096-1107. PubMed ID: 30891775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews in Japanese Physical Therapy Journals.
    Takashi A; Daichi I
    Prog Rehabil Med; 2020; 5():20200005. PubMed ID: 32789273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.