197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35181892)
1. Reformulated McNamara RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Ramesh P; Lyu Q; Gu W; Ruan D; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2136-2149. PubMed ID: 35181892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robust beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Neph R; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3356-3370. PubMed ID: 31169917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hypoxia-informed RBE-weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity modulated proton therapy.
Ramesh P; Ruan D; Liu SJ; Seo Y; Braunstein S; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2320-2333. PubMed ID: 38345134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robust optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy with soft spot sensitivity regularization.
Gu W; Ruan D; O'Connor D; Zou W; Dong L; Tsai MY; Jia X; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1408-1425. PubMed ID: 30570164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Difference in LET-based biological doses between IMPT optimization techniques: Robust and PTV-based optimizations.
Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Yasuda K; Takao S; Fujii T; Miyamoto N; Umegaki K; Shimizu S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 21(4):42-50. PubMed ID: 32150329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Introducing Proton Track-End Objectives in Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy Optimization to Reduce Linear Energy Transfer and Relative Biological Effectiveness in Critical Structures.
Traneus E; Ödén J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2019 Mar; 103(3):747-757. PubMed ID: 30395906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robust intensity-modulated proton therapy to reduce high linear energy transfer in organs at risk.
An Y; Shan J; Patel SH; Wong W; Schild SE; Ding X; Bues M; Liu W
Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6138-6147. PubMed ID: 28976574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing biological effectiveness guided plan optimization strategies for cranial proton therapy: potential and challenges.
Hahn C; Heuchel L; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Plaude S; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Oct; 17(1):169. PubMed ID: 36273132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The dirty and clean dose concept: Towards creating proton therapy treatment plans with a photon-like dose response.
Heuchel L; Hahn C; Ödén J; Traneus E; Wulff J; Timmermann B; Bäumer C; Lühr A
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):622-636. PubMed ID: 37877574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A unified path seeking algorithm for IMRT and IMPT beam orientation optimization.
Ramesh P; Valdes G; O'Connor D; Sheng K
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Sep; 68(19):. PubMed ID: 37659406
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Improve the dosimetric outcome in bilateral head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment using spot-scanning proton arc (SPArc) therapy: a feasibility study.
Liu G; Li X; Qin A; Zheng W; Yan D; Zhang S; Stevens C; Kabolizadeh P; Ding X
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Jan; 15(1):21. PubMed ID: 32000817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Technical Note: Treatment planning system (TPS) approximations matter - comparing intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan quality and robustness between a commercial and an in-house developed TPS for nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Liu C; Yu NY; Shan J; Bhangoo RS; Daniels TB; Chiang JS; Ding X; Lara P; Patrick CL; Archuleta JP; DeWees T; Hu Y; Schild SE; Bues M; Sio TT; Liu W
Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 46(11):4755-4762. PubMed ID: 31498885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.
Gu W; Ruan D; Zou W; Dong L; Sheng K
Med Phys; 2021 Jan; 48(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 32542711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of proton LET/RBE modeling and robustness analysis on base-of-skull and pediatric craniopharyngioma proton plans relative to VMAT.
Gutierrez A; Rompokos V; Li K; Gillies C; D'Souza D; Solda F; Fersht N; Chang YC; Royle G; Amos RA; Underwood T
Acta Oncol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):1765-1774. PubMed ID: 31429359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Robust Optimization for Intensity Modulated Proton Therapy to Redistribute High Linear Energy Transfer from Nearby Critical Organs to Tumors in Head and Neck Cancer.
Liu C; Patel SH; Shan J; Schild SE; Vargas CE; Wong WW; Ding X; Bues M; Liu W
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 May; 107(1):181-193. PubMed ID: 31987967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical implementation in proton therapy of multi-field optimization by a hybrid method combining conventional PTV with robust optimization.
Tommasino F; Widesott L; Fracchiolla F; Lorentini S; Righetto R; Algranati C; Scifoni E; Dionisi F; Scartoni D; Amelio D; Cianchetti M; Schwarz M; Amichetti M; Farace P
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Feb; 65(4):045002. PubMed ID: 31851957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric benefits of robust treatment planning for intensity modulated proton therapy for base-of-skull cancers.
Liu W; Mohan R; Park P; Liu Z; Li H; Li X; Li Y; Wu R; Sahoo N; Dong L; Zhu XR; Grosshans DR
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2014; 4(6):384-91. PubMed ID: 25407859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effectiveness of robust optimization in intensity-modulated proton therapy planning for head and neck cancers.
Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Park PC; Dong L; Ronald Zhu X; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051711. PubMed ID: 23635259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of breathing motion and a variable relative biological effectiveness in proton therapy of left-sided breast cancer.
Ödén J; Toma-Dasu I; Eriksson K; Flejmer AM; Dasu A
Acta Oncol; 2017 Nov; 56(11):1428-1436. PubMed ID: 28826308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
