164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35182032)
1. Understanding the Biological Interactions of pH-Swellable Nanoparticles.
Kermaniyan SS; Chen M; Zhang C; Smith SA; Johnston APR; Such C; Such GK
Macromol Biosci; 2022 May; 22(5):e2100445. PubMed ID: 35182032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. pH-responsive cationic liposome for endosomal escape mediated drug delivery.
Rayamajhi S; Marchitto J; Nguyen TDT; Marasini R; Celia C; Aryal S
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2020 Apr; 188():110804. PubMed ID: 31972443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Controlling endosomal escape using nanoparticle composition: current progress and future perspectives.
Cupic KI; Rennick JJ; Johnston AP; Such GK
Nanomedicine (Lond); 2019 Jan; 14(2):215-223. PubMed ID: 30511881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Super-resolution Imaging of Proton Sponge-Triggered Rupture of Endosomes and Cytosolic Release of Small Interfering RNA.
Wojnilowicz M; Glab A; Bertucci A; Caruso F; Cavalieri F
ACS Nano; 2019 Jan; 13(1):187-202. PubMed ID: 30566836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantifying the Endosomal Escape of pH-Responsive Nanoparticles Using the Split Luciferase Endosomal Escape Quantification Assay.
Beach MA; Teo SLY; Chen MZ; Smith SA; Pouton CW; Johnston APR; Such GK
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2022 Jan; 14(3):3653-3661. PubMed ID: 34964593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Endosomal Size and Membrane Leakiness Influence Proton Sponge-Based Rupture of Endosomal Vesicles.
Vermeulen LMP; Brans T; Samal SK; Dubruel P; Demeester J; De Smedt SC; Remaut K; Braeckmans K
ACS Nano; 2018 Mar; 12(3):2332-2345. PubMed ID: 29505236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Probing Endosomal Escape Using pHlexi Nanoparticles.
Kongkatigumjorn N; Cortez-Jugo C; Czuba E; Wong AS; Hodgetts RY; Johnston AP; Such GK
Macromol Biosci; 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 27786422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatiotemporal monitoring endocytic and cytosolic pH gradients with endosomal escaping pH-responsive micellar nanocarriers.
Hu J; Liu G; Wang C; Liu T; Zhang G; Liu S
Biomacromolecules; 2014 Nov; 15(11):4293-301. PubMed ID: 25317967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Self-assembling dual component nanoparticles with endosomal escape capability.
Wong AS; Mann SK; Czuba E; Sahut A; Liu H; Suekama TC; Bickerton T; Johnston AP; Such GK
Soft Matter; 2015 Apr; 11(15):2993-3002. PubMed ID: 25731820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chemically Tuned Intracellular Gene Delivery by Core-Shell Nanoparticles: Effects of Proton Buffering, Acid Degradability, and Membrane Disruption.
Cho SK; Lee RT; Hwang YH; Kwon YJ
ChemMedChem; 2022 Apr; 17(7):e202100718. PubMed ID: 35060681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dual-responsive polyplexes with enhanced disassembly and endosomal escape for efficient delivery of siRNA.
Zhu J; Qiao M; Wang Q; Ye Y; Ba S; Ma J; Hu H; Zhao X; Chen D
Biomaterials; 2018 Apr; 162():47-59. PubMed ID: 29432988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Octaarginine- and octalysine-modified nanoparticles have different modes of endosomal escape.
El-Sayed A; Khalil IA; Kogure K; Futaki S; Harashima H
J Biol Chem; 2008 Aug; 283(34):23450-61. PubMed ID: 18550548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Calcium Enabled Remote Loading of a Weak Acid Into pH-sensitive Liposomes and Augmented Cytosolic Delivery to Cancer Cells via the Proton Sponge Effect.
Yang MM; Yarragudi SB; Jamieson SMF; Tang M; Wilson WR; Wu Z
Pharm Res; 2022 Jun; 39(6):1181-1195. PubMed ID: 35229237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metal-Phenolic Coatings as a Platform to Trigger Endosomal Escape of Nanoparticles.
Chen J; Li J; Zhou J; Lin Z; Cavalieri F; Czuba-Wojnilowicz E; Hu Y; Glab A; Ju Y; Richardson JJ; Caruso F
ACS Nano; 2019 Oct; 13(10):11653-11664. PubMed ID: 31573181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The pH-Triggered Triblock Nanocarrier Enabled Highly Efficient siRNA Delivery for Cancer Therapy.
Du L; Zhou J; Meng L; Wang X; Wang C; Huang Y; Zheng S; Deng L; Cao H; Liang Z; Dong A; Cheng Q
Theranostics; 2017; 7(14):3432-3445. PubMed ID: 28912886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Endosomal Escape of Nanoparticles: Toward More Efficient Cellular Delivery.
Smith SA; Selby LI; Johnston APR; Such GK
Bioconjug Chem; 2019 Feb; 30(2):263-272. PubMed ID: 30452233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Lysosomal Proton Buffering of Poly(ethylenimine) Measured
Roy S; Zhu D; Parak WJ; Feliu N
ACS Nano; 2020 Jul; 14(7):8012-8023. PubMed ID: 32568521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Strategies in the design of endosomolytic agents for facilitating endosomal escape in nanoparticles.
Ahmad A; Khan JM; Haque S
Biochimie; 2019 May; 160():61-75. PubMed ID: 30797879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The possible "proton sponge " effect of polyethylenimine (PEI) does not include change in lysosomal pH.
Benjaminsen RV; Mattebjerg MA; Henriksen JR; Moghimi SM; Andresen TL
Mol Ther; 2013 Jan; 21(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 23032976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The proton sponge hypothesis: Fable or fact?
Vermeulen LMP; De Smedt SC; Remaut K; Braeckmans K
Eur J Pharm Biopharm; 2018 Aug; 129():184-190. PubMed ID: 29859281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
