These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35182073)

  • 41. A novel co-amplification system for simultaneous amplification of 23 Y-STR and identification of spermatozoa.
    Lin YC; Tsai LC; Liu KL; Huang NE; Yang LJ; Su CW; Lee JC; Linacre A; Hsieh HM
    Int J Legal Med; 2022 Jan; 136(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 34713334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Personal identification using Y-chromosomal short tandem repeats from bodily fluids mixed with semen.
    Tsuji A; Ishiko A; Ikeda N; Yamaguchi H
    Am J Forensic Med Pathol; 2001 Sep; 22(3):288-91. PubMed ID: 11563742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Identification of body fluid-specific DNA methylation markers for use in forensic science.
    Park JL; Kwon OH; Kim JH; Yoo HS; Lee HC; Woo KM; Kim SY; Lee SH; Kim YS
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Nov; 13():147-53. PubMed ID: 25128690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Results of the 2003-2004 GEP-ISFG collaborative study on mitochondrial DNA: focus on the mtDNA profile of a mixed semen-saliva stain.
    Crespillo M; Paredes MR; Prieto L; Montesino M; Salas A; Albarran C; Alvarez-Iglesias V; Amorin A; Berniell-Lee G; Brehm A; Carril JC; Corach D; Cuevas N; Di Lonardo AM; Doutremepuich C; Espinheira RM; Espinoza M; Gómez F; González A; Hernández A; Hidalgo M; Jimenez M; Leite FP; López AM; López-Soto M; Lorente JA; Pagano S; Palacio AM; Pestano JJ; Pinheiro MF; Raimondi E; Ramón MM; Tovar F; Vidal-Rioja L; Vide MC; Whittle MR; Yunis JJ; Garcia-Hirschfel J
    Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Jul; 160(2-3):157-67. PubMed ID: 16243467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Evaluation of Human Semenogelin Membrane Strip Test for Species Cross-reactivity in Dogs.
    Stern AW; Lanka S
    Vet Pathol; 2016 Sep; 53(5):1095-8. PubMed ID: 26574559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Vaginal swab specimen processing methods influence performance of rapid semen detection tests: a cautionary tale.
    Hobbs MM; Steiner MJ; Rich KD; Gallo MF; Warner L; Macaluso M
    Contraception; 2010 Sep; 82(3):291-5. PubMed ID: 20705160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
    Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of commercial kits for dual extraction of DNA and RNA from human body fluids.
    Schweighardt AJ; Tate CM; Scott KA; Harper KA; Robertson JM
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60(1):157-65. PubMed ID: 25284026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison between prostate specific antigen and acid phosphatase for detection of semen in vaginal swabs from raped women.
    Peonim V; Worasuwannarak W; Sujirachato K; Teerakamchai S; Srisont S; Udnoon J; Chudoung U
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2013 Aug; 20(6):578-81. PubMed ID: 23910836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Positive prostate-specific antigen (PSA) reaction in post-mortem rectal swabs: a cautionary note.
    Lunetta P; Sippel H
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2009 Oct; 16(7):397-9. PubMed ID: 19733329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Comparison of MPure-12 Automatic Nucleic Acid Purification and Chelex-100 Method].
    Shen X; Li M; Wang YL; Chen YL; Lin Y; Zhao ZM; Que TZ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 33(2):168-170. PubMed ID: 29231025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Brazilian forensic casework analysis through MPS applications: Statistical weight-of-evidence and biological nature of criminal samples as an influence factor in quality metrics.
    Avila E; Cavalheiro CP; Felkl AB; Graebin P; Kahmann A; Alho CS
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Oct; 303():109938. PubMed ID: 31542402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Validation of an immunochromatographic D-dimer test to presumptively identify menstrual fluid in forensic exhibits.
    Holtkötter H; Dierig L; Schürenkamp M; Sibbing U; Pfeiffer H; Vennemann M
    Int J Legal Med; 2015 Jan; 129(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 25370906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Acid phosphatase test on Phadebas
    Herman Y; Feine I; Gafny R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Jul; 288():218-222. PubMed ID: 29775922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validation of the AmpliFLP D1S80 PCR Amplification Kit for forensic casework analysis according to TWGDAM guidelines.
    Cosso S; Reynolds R
    J Forensic Sci; 1995 May; 40(3):424-34. PubMed ID: 7782746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Introducing novel type of human DNA markers for forensic tissue identification: DNA copy number variation allows the detection of blood and semen.
    Zubakov D; Chamier-Ciemińska J; Kokmeijer I; Maciejewska A; Martínez P; Pawłowski R; Haas C; Kayser M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Sep; 36():112-118. PubMed ID: 29986230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Development of a modified p-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde solution for touch DNA analysis and its application to STR analysis.
    Yano R; Shimoda O; Okitsu T; Sakurada M; Ueno Y
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Jan; 38():86-92. PubMed ID: 30391625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A protocol for direct and rapid multiplex PCR amplification on forensically relevant samples.
    Verheij S; Harteveld J; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 21530436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Evaluation of the relationship between the detectability of seminal stains on laundered fabric and stain age.
    Karadayı Ş; Karadayı B; Öner D; Çetin G
    Med Sci Law; 2021 Jul; 61(3):198-207. PubMed ID: 33573465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of the BioSign PSA membrane test for the identification of semen stains in forensic casework.
    Maher J; Vintiner S; Elliot D; Melia L
    N Z Med J; 2002 Feb; 115(1147):48-9. PubMed ID: 11942515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.