252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35182228)
1. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prepectoral single-stage breast reconstruction.
Liu J; Zheng X; Lin S; Han H; Xu C
Support Care Cancer; 2022 Jul; 30(7):5659-5668. PubMed ID: 35182228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prevention of Postoperative Complications by Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim YH; Yang YJ; Lee DW; Song SY; Lew DH; Yang EJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2024 Jan; 153(1):10e-24e. PubMed ID: 37010460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Postoperative Complications Following Prepectoral Versus Partial Subpectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Using ADM: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Zhu L; Liu C
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2023 Aug; 47(4):1260-1273. PubMed ID: 36947180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quality of life, pain of prepectoral and subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction with a discussion on cost: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ching AH; Lim K; Sze PW; Ooi A
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2022 Aug; 75(8):2550-2560. PubMed ID: 35393263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Comparative Analysis between Subpectoral versus Prepectoral Single Stage Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction.
Kim JH; Hong SE
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Oct; 56(10):. PubMed ID: 33066236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Examination of Outcome Disparities in Reports of Prepectoral and Subpectoral Direct-to-Implant Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Montorfano L; Hung YC; Chaker S; Saad M; Kalmar CL; Ferri F; Higdon KK; Perdikis G
Ann Plast Surg; 2023 May; 90(5):506-515. PubMed ID: 36975095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Impact of Premastectomy Versus Postmastectomy Radiation Therapy on Outcomes in Prepectoral Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Sinnott CJ; Pronovost MT; Persing SM; Wu R; Young AO
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 87(1s Suppl 1):S21-S27. PubMed ID: 33833185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ADMs and synthetic meshes improve implant-based breast reconstruction aesthetics, but at what cost?
Samaha Y; Chen J; Ray EC
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 May; 80():178-181. PubMed ID: 37028245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of prepectoral and subpectoral breast reconstruction after mastectomies: A systematic review and meta analysis.
Li L; Su Y; Xiu B; Huang X; Chi W; Hou J; Zhang Y; Tian J; Wang J; Wu J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1542-1550. PubMed ID: 31256950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-Term Outcomes in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Two-Stage Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction after Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Alcon A; Rosser M; Gedallovich J; Foster RD; Sbitany H; Piper ML
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Aug; 152(2):273-280. PubMed ID: 36723619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of Human, Porcine, and Bovine Acellular Dermal Matrix in Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.
Pires GR; Moss WD; Hosein RC; Overschmidt BT; Magno-Padron DA; Agarwal JP; McFarland MM; Casucci T; Kwok AC
Ann Plast Surg; 2022 Dec; 89(6):694-702. PubMed ID: 36416706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acute Postoperative Complications in Prepectoral versus Subpectoral Reconstruction following Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
Avila A; Bartholomew AJ; Sosin M; Deldar R; Griffith KF; Willey SC; Song DH; Fan KL; Tousimis EA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Dec; 146(6):715e-720e. PubMed ID: 33234947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do we need acellular dermal matrix in prepectoral breast reconstruction? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Nolan IT; Farajzadeh MM; Boyd CJ; Bekisz JM; Gibson EG; Salibian AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Nov; 86():251-260. PubMed ID: 37793198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prepectoral Revision Breast Reconstruction for Treatment of Implant-Associated Animation Deformity: A Review of 102 Reconstructions.
Gabriel A; Sigalove S; Sigalove NM; Storm-Dickerson TL; Rice J; Pope N; Maxwell GP
Aesthet Surg J; 2018 Apr; 38(5):519-526. PubMed ID: 29365064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction: Safety Outcome Endpoints and Delineation of Risk Factors.
Nealon KP; Weitzman RE; Sobti N; Gadd M; Specht M; Jimenez RB; Ehrlichman R; Faulkner HR; Austen WG; Liao EC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 May; 145(5):898e-908e. PubMed ID: 32332523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aesthetic Limitations in Direct-to-Implant Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction.
Safran T; Al-Badarin F; Al-Halabi B; Viezel-Mathieu A; Dionisopoulos T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2022 Jul; 150(1):22e-31e. PubMed ID: 35499675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Difference in the outcomes of anterior tenting and wrapping techniques for acellular dermal matrix coverage in prepectoral breast reconstruction.
Sohn SM; Lee HC; Park SH; Yoon ES
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2023 Oct; 85():266-275. PubMed ID: 37536194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. When to Consider Prepectoral Implant Conversion After Subpectoral Implant Breast Reconstruction and How to Plan It.
Salgarello M; Barone Adesi L; Macrì G; Visconti G
Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Nov; 43(12):NP1071-NP1077. PubMed ID: 37668406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A systematic review and meta-analysis of postmastectomy radiation therapy on prepectoral versus subpectoral breast reconstruction.
Zheng C; Liu J; Wen Y; Lin S; Han H; Xu C
Front Surg; 2022; 9():1019950. PubMed ID: 36700017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Complications Following Subpectoral Versus Prepectoral Breast Augmentation: A Meta-analysis.
Li S; Mu D; Liu C; Xin M; Fu S; Xu B; Li Z; Qi J; Luan J
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2019 Aug; 43(4):890-898. PubMed ID: 31139912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
