BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

513 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35183695)

  • 1. Accuracy of dental implant placement using augmented reality-based navigation, static computer assisted implant surgery, and the free-hand method: An in vitro study.
    Kivovics M; Takács A; Pénzes D; Németh O; Mijiritsky E
    J Dent; 2022 Apr; 119():104070. PubMed ID: 35183695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accuracy of dental implant placement using static versus dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: An in vitro study.
    Taheri Otaghsara SS; Joda T; Thieringer FM
    J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104487. PubMed ID: 36948382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Accuracy of implant placement using a mixed reality-based dynamic navigation system versus static computer-assisted and freehand surgery: An in Vitro study.
    Shusterman A; Nashef R; Tecco S; Mangano C; Lerner H; Mangano FG
    J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105052. PubMed ID: 38734298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does implant drill design influence the accuracy of dental implant placement using static computer-assisted implant surgery? An in vitro study.
    Takács A; Marada G; Turzó K; Nagy Á; Németh O; Mijiritsky E; Kivovics M; Mühl A
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Aug; 23(1):575. PubMed ID: 37596610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The accuracy of static vs. dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial.
    Kaewsiri D; Panmekiate S; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jun; 30(6):505-514. PubMed ID: 31060099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position for two-implants supported fixed dental prosthesis using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Yimarj P; Subbalekha K; Dhanesuan K; Siriwatana K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2020 Dec; 22(6):672-678. PubMed ID: 32939934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the accuracy of immediate implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted implant system in the esthetic zone of the maxilla: a prospective study.
    Feng Y; Su Z; Mo A; Yang X
    Int J Implant Dent; 2022 Dec; 8(1):65. PubMed ID: 36512162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Surgical Guide Fixation and Implant Location on Accuracy of Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery.
    Pessoa R; Siqueira R; Li J; Saleh I; Meneghetti P; Bezerra F; Wang HL; Mendonça G
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 31(2):155-164. PubMed ID: 33904640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advancing accuracy in guided implant placement: A comprehensive meta-analysis: Meta-Analysis evaluation of the accuracy of available implant placement Methods.
    Takács A; Hardi E; Cavalcante BGN; Szabó B; Kispélyi B; Joób-Fancsaly Á; Mikulás K; Varga G; Hegyi P; Kivovics M
    J Dent; 2023 Dec; 139():104748. PubMed ID: 37863173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position among freehand implant placement, static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous patients: a non-randomized prospective study.
    Jaemsuwan S; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 52(2):264-271. PubMed ID: 35752531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of implant placement via dynamic navigation and autonomous robotic computer-assisted implant surgery methods: A retrospective study.
    Zhang S; Cai Q; Chen W; Lin Y; Gao Y; Wu D; Chen J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Feb; 35(2):220-229. PubMed ID: 38033198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of zygomatic dental implant placement using computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems compared with a mixed reality appliance. An in vitro study.
    González-Rueda JR; Galparsoro-Catalán A; de Paz-Hermoso VM; Riad-Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato-Mourelo J; Hernández-Montero S; Montero-Martín J
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2023 Dec; 15(12):e1035-e1044. PubMed ID: 38186921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of computer-aided static and dynamic navigation systems in the placement of zygomatic dental implants.
    González Rueda JR; Galparsoro Catalán A; de Paz Hermoso VM; Riad Deglow E; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Pato Mourelo J; Montero Martín J; Hernández Montero S
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Mar; 23(1):150. PubMed ID: 36918837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Placement accuracy and primary stability of implants in the esthetic zone using dynamic and static computer-assisted navigation: A retrospective case-control study.
    Liu Q; Liu Y; Chen D; Wu X; Huang R; Liu R; Chen Z; Chen Z
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):427-435. PubMed ID: 36473750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of implant placement with a combined use of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in single tooth space: A randomized controlled trial.
    Yotpibulwong T; Arunjaroensuk S; Kaboosaya B; Sinpitaksakul P; Arksornnukit M; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Apr; 34(4):330-341. PubMed ID: 36756684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the accuracy of two different dynamic navigation system registration methods for dental implant placement: A retrospective study.
    Ma F; Sun F; Wei T; Ma Y
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2022 Jun; 24(3):352-360. PubMed ID: 35536921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and patient-centered results of marker-based and marker-free registrations for dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery: A randomized controlled trial.
    Zhu J; Sun W; Li L; Li H; Zou Y; Huang B; Ji W; Shi B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2024 Jan; 35(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 37955359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A mixed reality-based navigation method for dental implant navigation method: A pilot study.
    Liu L; Wang X; Guan M; Fan Y; Yang Z; Li D; Bai Y; Li H
    Comput Biol Med; 2023 Mar; 154():106568. PubMed ID: 36739818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of the Yakebot dental implant robotic system versus fully guided static computer-assisted implant surgery template in edentulous jaw implantation: A preliminary clinical study.
    Wang W; Xu H; Mei D; Zhou C; Li X; Han Z; Zhou X; Li X; Zhao B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2024 Apr; 26(2):309-316. PubMed ID: 37728030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using dynamic and augmented reality-based dynamic navigation: An
    Tao B; Fan X; Wang F; Chen X; Shen Y; Wu Y
    J Dent Sci; 2024 Jan; 19(1):196-202. PubMed ID: 38303816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.