512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35183695)
21. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of the accuracy of the orthodontic mini-implants placed in the inter-radicular space by image-guided-based techniques.
Mihit Mihit FZ; Zubizarreta-Macho Á; Montiel-Company JM; Albaladejo Martínez A
BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):383. PubMed ID: 37308848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and patient-centered results of static and dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws: a retrospective cohort study.
Fu S; Sun W; Zhu J; Huang B; Ji W; Shi B
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Sep; 27(9):5427-5438. PubMed ID: 37480368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of dental implant surgery using dynamic navigation and robotic systems: An in vitro study.
Tao B; Feng Y; Fan X; Zhuang M; Chen X; Wang F; Wu Y
J Dent; 2022 Aug; 123():104170. PubMed ID: 35679989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy of Augmented Reality-Assisted Navigation in Dental Implant Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Mai HN; Dam VV; Lee DH
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jan; 25():e42040. PubMed ID: 36598798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Placement accuracy and primary stability of implants in the esthetic zone using dynamic and static computer-assisted navigation: A retrospective case-control study.
Liu Q; Liu Y; Chen D; Wu X; Huang R; Liu R; Chen Z; Chen Z
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Mar; 131(3):427-435. PubMed ID: 36473750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The accuracy and learning curve of active and passive dynamic navigation-guided dental implant surgery: An in vitro study.
Wang XY; Liu L; Guan MS; Liu Q; Zhao T; Li HB
J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104240. PubMed ID: 35872224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Accuracy assessment of dynamic computer-aided implant placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jorba-García A; González-Barnadas A; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 May; 25(5):2479-2494. PubMed ID: 33635397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Dental Implant Placement Accuracy Using a Static Surgical Guide, a Virtual Guide and a Manual Placement Method -
Lysenko AV; Yaremenko AI; Ivanov VM; Lyubimov AI; Leletkina NA; Prokofeva AA
Ann Maxillofac Surg; 2023; 13(2):158-162. PubMed ID: 38405564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The accuracy of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery in fully edentulous jaws: A retrospective case series.
Wang J; Ge Y; Mühlemann S; Pan S; Jung RE
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Nov; 34(11):1278-1288. PubMed ID: 37642206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for dental implant placement in fully edentulous patients: A retrospective case series study.
Li P; Chen J; Li A; Luo K; Xu S; Yang S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1428-1437. PubMed ID: 37855331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy assessment of dynamic navigation during implant placement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies in the last 10 years.
Yu X; Tao B; Wang F; Wu Y
J Dent; 2023 Aug; 135():104567. PubMed ID: 37263412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accuracy of autonomous robotic surgery for single-tooth implant placement: A case series.
Yang S; Chen J; Li A; Deng K; Li P; Xu S
J Dent; 2023 May; 132():104451. PubMed ID: 36781099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Augmented reality for dental implantology: a pilot clinical report of two cases.
Pellegrino G; Mangano C; Mangano R; Ferri A; Taraschi V; Marchetti C
BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):158. PubMed ID: 31324246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The influence of radiographic marker registration versus a markerless trace registration method on the implant placement accuracy achieved by dynamic computer-assisted implant surgery. An in-vitro study.
Jorba-García A; Bara-Casaus JJ; Camps-Font O; Figueiredo R; Valmaseda-Castellón E
J Dent; 2024 Jul; 146():105072. PubMed ID: 38763387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel mixed reality-guided dental implant placement navigation system based on virtual-actual registration.
Fan X; Tao B; Tu P; Shen Y; Wu Y; Chen X
Comput Biol Med; 2023 Nov; 166():107560. PubMed ID: 37847946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy of implant position when placed using static computer-assisted implant surgical guides manufactured with two different optical scanning techniques: a randomized clinical trial.
Kiatkroekkrai P; Takolpuckdee C; Subbalekha K; Mattheos N; Pimkhaokham A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Mar; 49(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 31543382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted systems: an in vitro study.
Zhou M; Zhou H; Li SY; Zhu YB; Geng YM
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Sep; 122(4):343-348. PubMed ID: 33307210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Computer-Assisted Dental Implant Placement Following Free Flap Reconstruction: Virtual Planning, CAD/CAM Templates, Dynamic Navigation and Augmented Reality.
Ochandiano S; García-Mato D; Gonzalez-Alvarez A; Moreta-Martinez R; Tousidonis M; Navarro-Cuellar C; Navarro-Cuellar I; Salmerón JI; Pascau J
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():754943. PubMed ID: 35155183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of Implant Placement Accuracy in Healed and Fresh Extraction Sockets between Static and Dynamic Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery Navigation Systems: A Model-Based Evaluation.
Wang M; Rausch-Fan X; Zhan Y; Shen H; Liu F
Materials (Basel); 2022 Apr; 15(8):. PubMed ID: 35454496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a dynamic navigation system for training students in dental implant placement.
Zhan Y; Wang M; Cheng X; Li Y; Shi X; Liu F
J Dent Educ; 2021 Feb; 85(2):120-127. PubMed ID: 32914421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
