148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35184229)
1. Assessing the impact of different penalty factors of the Bayesian reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on in vivo low count kinetic analysis of [
Ribeiro D; Hallett W; Howes O; McCutcheon R; Nour MM; Tavares AAS
EJNMMI Res; 2022 Feb; 12(1):11. PubMed ID: 35184229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance evaluation of the Q.Clear reconstruction framework versus conventional reconstruction algorithms for quantitative brain PET-MR studies.
Ribeiro D; Hallett W; Tavares AAS
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 May; 8(1):41. PubMed ID: 33961164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR.
Tian D; Yang H; Li Y; Cui B; Lu J
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 35006411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) of
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Schuster DM; Tsakok MT; Gleeson FV; Bradley KM
Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20170727. PubMed ID: 29303359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on
Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Farzanehfar S; Ghafarian P; Moafpurian Y; Ay M
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Oct; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 37843705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Y-90 PET/MR imaging optimization with a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Calatayud-Jordán J; Carrasco-Vela N; Chimeno-Hernández J; Carles-Fariña M; Olivas-Arroyo C; Bello-Arqués P; Pérez-Enguix D; Martí-Bonmatí L; Torres-Espallardo I
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38884672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The clinical effectiveness of reconstructing
Usmani S; Ahmed N; Gnanasegaran G; Rasheed R; Marafi F; Alnaaimi M; Omar M; Musbah A; Al Kandari F; De Schepper S; Van den Wyngaert T
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20210043. PubMed ID: 33571003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of scan-time shortening on the
Matsunaga K; Tonomura M; Abe K; Shimosegawa E
Ann Nucl Med; 2023 Apr; 37(4):227-237. PubMed ID: 36656501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Phantom and clinical assessment of small pulmonary nodules using Q.Clear reconstruction on a silicon-photomultiplier-based time-of-flight PET/CT system.
Wu Z; Guo B; Huang B; Hao X; Wu P; Zhao B; Qin Z; Xie J; Li S
Sci Rep; 2021 May; 11(1):10328. PubMed ID: 33990659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of Image Reconstruction for
Rowley LM; Bradley KM; Boardman P; Hallam A; McGowan DR
J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 27688476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging.
Chang T; Chang G; Clark JW; Diab RH; Rohren E; Mawlawi OR
Med Phys; 2012 Oct; 39(10):5891-900. PubMed ID: 23039628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation and Optimization of a New PET Reconstruction Algorithm, Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction, for Lung Cancer Assessment According to Lesion Size.
Otani T; Hosono M; Kanagaki M; Onishi Y; Matsubara N; Kawabata K; Kimura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Aug; 213(2):W50-W56. PubMed ID: 30995096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
