150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35184229)
21. Relaxed ordered subset preconditioned alternating projection algorithm for PET reconstruction with automated penalty weight selection.
Ross Schmidtlein C; Lin Y; Li S; Krol A; Beattie BJ; Humm JL; Xu Y
Med Phys; 2017 Aug; 44(8):4083-4097. PubMed ID: 28437565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Noise reduction using a Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm on a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner.
Caribé PRRV; Koole M; D'Asseler Y; Van Den Broeck B; Vandenberghe S
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):22. PubMed ID: 31823084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can a penalized-likelihood estimation algorithm be used to reduce the injected dose or the acquisition time in
Chicheportiche A; Goshen E; Godefroy J; Grozinsky-Glasberg S; Oleinikov K; Meirovitz A; Gross DJ; Ben-Haim S
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 33580359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm suppresses edge artifacts in PET reconstruction based on point-spread-function.
Yamaguchi S; Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Ishii K; Inoue K; Fukushi M
Phys Med; 2018 Mar; 47():73-79. PubMed ID: 29609821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Q.Clear reconstruction for reducing the scanning time for
Ruan W; Qin C; Liu F; Pi R; Gai Y; Liu Q; Lan X
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2023 Jun; 50(7):1851-1860. PubMed ID: 36847826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Ordered subset expectation maximisation vs Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm in 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT.
Witkowska-Patena E; Budzyńska A; Giżewska A; Dziuk M; Walęcka-Mazur A
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Mar; 34(3):192-199. PubMed ID: 31902120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of
Lindström E; Lindsjö L; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jun; 7(1):40. PubMed ID: 32542512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Rapid Whole-Body FDG PET/MRI in Oncology Patients: Utility of Combining Bayesian Penalised Likelihood PET Reconstruction and Abbreviated MRI.
Inukai JI; Nogami M; Tachibana M; Zeng F; Nishitani T; Kubo K; Murakami T
Diagnostics (Basel); 2023 May; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 37296723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cross-validation study between the HRRT and the PET component of the SIGNA PET/MRI system with focus on neuroimaging.
Mannheim JG; Cheng JK; Vafai N; Shahinfard E; English C; McKenzie J; Zhang J; Barlow L; Sossi V
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):20. PubMed ID: 33635449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Phantom, clinical, and texture indices evaluation and optimization of a penalized-likelihood image reconstruction method (Q.Clear) on a BGO PET/CT scanner.
Reynés-Llompart G; Gámez-Cenzano C; Vercher-Conejero JL; Sabaté-Llobera A; Calvo-Malvar N; Martí-Climent JM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3214-3222. PubMed ID: 29782657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A novel figure of merit to investigate
Santoro M; Della Gala G; Paolani G; Zagni F; Civollani S; Strolin S; Strigari L
Phys Med; 2023 Feb; 106():102523. PubMed ID: 36641902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Phantom and clinical evaluation of the effect of a new Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (HYPER Iterative) on
Xu L; Cui C; Li R; Yang R; Liu R; Meng Q; Wang F
EJNMMI Res; 2022 Dec; 12(1):73. PubMed ID: 36504014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantitative accuracy of MAP reconstruction for dynamic PET imaging in small animals.
Cheng JC; Shoghi K; Laforest R
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1029-41. PubMed ID: 22320813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Impact of γ factor in the penalty function of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) to achieve high-resolution PET images.
Miwa K; Yoshii T; Wagatsuma K; Nezu S; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Kobayashi R; Fukuda S; Yakushiji Y; Miyaji N; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Jan; 10(1):4. PubMed ID: 36681994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Direct parametric reconstruction in dynamic PET myocardial perfusion imaging: in vivo studies.
Petibon Y; Rakvongthai Y; El Fakhri G; Ouyang J
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(9):3539-3565. PubMed ID: 28379843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of New Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm on Visualization and Quantification of Upper Abdominal Malignant Tumors in Clinical FDG PET/CT Examinations.
Tatsumi M; Soeda F; Kamiya T; Ueda J; Katayama D; Matsunaga K; Watabe T; Kato H; Tomiyama N
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():707023. PubMed ID: 34485143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. How Do the More Recent Reconstruction Algorithms Affect the Interpretation Criteria of PET/CT Images?
Matti A; Lima GM; Pettinato C; Pietrobon F; Martinelli F; Fanti S
Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2019 Jun; 53(3):216-222. PubMed ID: 31231442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Influence of the partial volume correction method on (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose brain kinetic modelling from dynamic PET images reconstructed with resolution model based OSEM.
Bowen SL; Byars LG; Michel CJ; Chonde DB; Catana C
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 58(20):7081-106. PubMed ID: 24052021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance evaluation of iterative PET reconstruction with resolution recovery incorporating Gallium-68 positron range correction.
Gavriilidis P; Koole M; Marinus A; Jansen FP; Deller TW; Mottaghy FM; Wierts R
Med Phys; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38889361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
