These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35184287)

  • 21. Optimal timing of labour induction in contemporary clinical practice.
    Papalia N; D'Souza RD; Hobson SR
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Mar; 79():18-26. PubMed ID: 35000808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maternal obesity and labour complications following induction of labour in prolonged pregnancy.
    Arrowsmith S; Wray S; Quenby S
    BJOG; 2011 Apr; 118(5):578-88. PubMed ID: 21265999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Derivation and validation of a model predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth following labour induction.
    Alavifard S; Meier K; Shulman Y; Tomlinson G; D'Souza R
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Apr; 19(1):130. PubMed ID: 30991983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using inter-institutional practice variation to understand the risks and benefits of routine labour induction at 41(+0) weeks.
    Hutcheon JA; Harper S; Strumpf EC; Lee L; Marquette G
    BJOG; 2015 Jun; 122(7):973-81. PubMed ID: 25041161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outcomes of induction of labour in women with previous caesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study using a population database.
    Stock SJ; Ferguson E; Duffy A; Ford I; Chalmers J; Norman JE
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(4):e60404. PubMed ID: 23565242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Labour induction for late-term or post-term pregnancy.
    Dekker RL
    Women Birth; 2016 Aug; 29(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 26879103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Redesigning induction of labour processes.
    Beckmann M; Paterson E; Smith A
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jun; 58(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 29067683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. My Baby's Movements: An assessment of the effectiveness of the My Baby's Movements phone program in reducing late-gestation stillbirth rates.
    Skalecki S; Lawford H; Gardener G; Coory M; Bradford B; Warrilow K; Wojcieszek AM; Newth T; Weller M; Said JM; Boyle FM; East C; Gordon A; Middleton P; Ellwood D; Flenady V
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jun; 63(3):378-383. PubMed ID: 36717966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of fetal gender on induction of labor failure rates.
    Ashwal E; Hadar E; Chen R; Aviram A; Hiersch L; Gabbay-Benziv R
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Dec; 30(24):3009-3013. PubMed ID: 27936988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Outpatient Foley catheter versus inpatient prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour: a randomised trial.
    Henry A; Madan A; Reid R; Tracy SK; Austin K; Welsh A; Challis D
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Jan; 13():25. PubMed ID: 23356673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.
    Sue-A-Quan AK; Hannah ME; Cohen MM; Foster GA; Liston RM
    CMAJ; 1999 Apr; 160(8):1145-9. PubMed ID: 10234344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Induction of labour: how close to the evidence-based guidelines are we?
    Nooh A; Baghdadi S; Raouf S
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2005 Jul; 25(5):451-4. PubMed ID: 16183578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Outpatient induction of labour in the UK: a survey of practice.
    Sharp AN; Stock SJ; Alfirevic Z
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Sep; 204():21-3. PubMed ID: 27513897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does induction of labour in nulliparous hypertensive women result in vaginal birth? - A descriptive study utilising birth registry data.
    Thornton CE; Dahlen HG; Hennessy A
    Pregnancy Hypertens; 2018 Apr; 12():16-22. PubMed ID: 29674193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Foley catheter for cervical priming in induction of labour at University Obstetrics Unit, Colombo, Sri Lanka: a clinical audit with a patient satisfaction survey.
    Patabendige M; Jayawardane A
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Apr; 10(1):155. PubMed ID: 28403891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Induction of labour using prostaglandin E
    Beckmann M; Gibbons K; Flenady V; Kumar S
    BJOG; 2020 Apr; 127(5):571-579. PubMed ID: 31785056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Variation in clinical decision-making for induction of labour: a qualitative study.
    Nippita TA; Porter M; Seeho SK; Morris JM; Roberts CL
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):317. PubMed ID: 28938878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attitudes of pregnant women and healthcare professionals to labour induction and obtaining consent for labour induction.
    Coates R
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2021 Nov; 77():64-75. PubMed ID: 34625350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Induction of labour: clinical predictive factors for success and failure.
    Batinelli L; Serafini A; Nante N; Petraglia F; Severi FM; Messina G
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Apr; 38(3):352-358. PubMed ID: 29058493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using the Nippita classification system for women undergoing induction of labour in a large metropolitan maternity service: Bringing simplicity and certainty to an important quality improvement process.
    Biro MA; East CE
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Apr; 57(2):228-231. PubMed ID: 28295168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.