These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35184302)

  • 1. Gene profiling reveals a contact allergy signature in most positive Amerchol L-101 patch test reactions.
    Ljungberg Silic L; Lefevre MA; Bergendorff O; De Bernard S; Nourikyan J; Buffat L; Nosbaum A; Bruze M; Nicolas JF; Svedman C; Vocanson M
    Contact Dermatitis; 2022 Jul; 87(1):40-52. PubMed ID: 35184302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to lanolin: A ROAT study.
    Uldahl A; Engfeldt M; Svedman C
    Contact Dermatitis; 2021 Jan; 84(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 32844454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnosing lanolin contact allergy with lanolin alcohol and Amerchol L101.
    Knijp J; Bruynzeel DP; Rustemeyer T
    Contact Dermatitis; 2019 May; 80(5):298-303. PubMed ID: 30624788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG).
    Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J;
    Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Unique molecular signatures typify skin inflammation induced by chemical allergens and irritants.
    Lefevre MA; Nosbaum A; Rozieres A; Lenief V; Mosnier A; Cortial A; Prieux M; De Bernard S; Nourikyan J; Jouve PE; Buffat L; Hacard F; Ferrier-Lebouedec MC; Pralong P; Dzviga C; Herman A; Baeck M; Nicolas JF; Vocanson M
    Allergy; 2021 Dec; 76(12):3697-3712. PubMed ID: 34174113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Gene profiling in active dermatitis lesions strengthens the diagnosis of allergic contact dermatitis.
    Lefevre MA; Nosbaum A; Mosnier A; Lenief V; Salque S; Pichot M; Maheux L; Bertolotti L; Hacard F; Graveriau C; Zukervar P; Breton Guitarian AL; Boisleve F; Elbaz M; Nicolas JF; Vocanson M
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2024 May; 90(5):953-962. PubMed ID: 38215793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lanolin Allergic Reactions: North American Contact Dermatitis Group Experience, 2001 to 2018.
    Silverberg JI; Patel N; Warshaw EM; DeKoven JG; Atwater AR; Belsito DV; Dunnick CA; Houle MC; Reeder MJ; Maibach HI; Zug KA; Taylor JS; Sasseville D; Fransway AF; DeLeo VA; Pratt MD; Fowler JF; Zirwas MJ
    Dermatitis; 2022 May-Jun 01; 33(3):193-199. PubMed ID: 35481824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant.
    Geier J; Uter W; Pirker C; Frosch PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12694214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnosis and prevalence of lanolin allergy.
    Miest RY; Yiannias JA; Chang YH; Singh N
    Dermatitis; 2013; 24(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 23665833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Discrepancy in patch test results with wool wax alcohols and Amerchol L-101.
    Matthieu L; Dockx P
    Contact Dermatitis; 1997 Mar; 36(3):150-1. PubMed ID: 9145265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patch testing is a useful investigation in children with eczema.
    Moustafa M; Holden CR; Athavale P; Cork MJ; Messenger AG; Gawkrodger DJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Oct; 65(4):208-12. PubMed ID: 21504435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contact allergy to colophony. Clinical and experimental studies with emphasis on clinical relevance.
    Färm G
    Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1998; 201():1-42. PubMed ID: 9833065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contact allergy to lanolin: temporal changes in prevalence and association with atopic dermatitis.
    Fransen M; Overgaard LEK; Johansen JD; Thyssen JP
    Contact Dermatitis; 2018 Jan; 78(1):70-75. PubMed ID: 28940210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hand dermatitis in adults referred for patch testing: Analysis of North American Contact Dermatitis Group Data, 2000 to 2016.
    Silverberg JI; Warshaw EM; Atwater AR; Maibach HI; Zug KA; Reeder MJ; Sasseville D; Taylor JS; Fowler JF; Pratt MD; Fransway AF; Zirwas MJ; Belsito DV; Marks JG; DeLeo VA; DeKoven JG
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2021 Apr; 84(4):989-999. PubMed ID: 33259878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Vesicular Contact Reaction May Progress into Erythema Multiforme.
    Czarnecka-Operacz M; Jenerowicz D; Szulczyńska-Gabor J; Teresiak-Mikołajczak E; Szyfter-Harris J; Bowszyc-Dmochowska M
    Acta Dermatovenerol Croat; 2016 Dec; 24(4):307-309. PubMed ID: 28128086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contact sensitization in Dutch children and adolescents with and without atopic dermatitis - a retrospective analysis.
    Lubbes S; Rustemeyer T; Sillevis Smitt JH; Schuttelaar ML; Middelkamp-Hup MA
    Contact Dermatitis; 2017 Mar; 76(3):151-159. PubMed ID: 27861990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patch testing with methyldibromo glutaronitrile, a multicentre study within the EECDRG.
    Gruvberger B; Andersen KE; Brandão FM; Bruynzeel DP; Bruze M; Frosch PJ; Goossens A; Lahti A; Lindberg M; Menné T; Orton D; Seidenari S
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jan; 52(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 15701124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Added Value of Patch Testing Beyond the Baseline Tray.
    Slodownik D; Kaplan Y; Sprecher E; Daniely D
    Dermatitis; 2022 May-Jun 01; 33(3):227-231. PubMed ID: 35481846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In vivo cytokine profiles in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis.
    Hoefakker S; Caubo M; van 't Erve EH; Roggeveen MJ; Boersma WJ; van Joost T; Notten WR; Claassen E
    Contact Dermatitis; 1995 Oct; 33(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 8654078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patch Testing for Methylisothiazolinone and Methylchloroisothiazolinone-Methylisothiazolinone Contact Allergy.
    Yu SH; Sood A; Taylor JS
    JAMA Dermatol; 2016 Jan; 152(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 26536492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.