140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35185097)
1. [The Influence on Image Reconstruction Methods on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Guided Vacuum-assisted Biopsy for Clustered Microcalcifications].
Kuwabara N; Asano S; Kawashima H
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022; 78(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 35185097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical performance of digital breast tomosynthesis-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy: a single-institution experience in Japan.
Ido M; Saito M; Banno H; Ito Y; Goto M; Ando T; Kousaka J; Mouri Y; Fujii K; Imai T; Nakano S; Suzuki K; Murotani K
BMC Med Imaging; 2023 Jan; 23(1):2. PubMed ID: 36604648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Diagnostic Mammography-Guided Biopsy and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-Guided Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Calcifications: Results in 1354 Biopsies.
Nguyen DL; Boron A; Oluyemi ET; Myers KS; Mullen LA; Ambinder EB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):212-223. PubMed ID: 36102725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. An iterative reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis imaging using real data at three radiation doses.
Polat A; Yildirim I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2018; 26(3):347-360. PubMed ID: 29504549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Realistic Breast Phantom Proposal for 3D Image Reconstruction in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Polat A; Kumrular RK
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221104567. PubMed ID: 36071652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel pre-processing technique for improving image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Kim H; Lee T; Hong J; Sabir S; Lee JR; Choi YW; Kim HH; Chae EY; Cho S
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):417-425. PubMed ID: 28032909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Influence of Image Reconstruction Method on Image Quality in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis].
Nishikawa M; Tominaga K; Ueno T; Yasukawa S; Hiroshige K; Mouri K; Kozawa Y; Uemura T; Fujimitsu R; Yoshimitsu K
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2021; 77(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 33473075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Upright Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided versus Prone Stereotactic Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy.
Bahl M; Maunglay M; D'Alessandro HA; Lehman CD
Radiology; 2019 Feb; 290(2):298-304. PubMed ID: 30511909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oblique reconstructions in tomosynthesis. II. Super-resolution.
Acciavatti RJ; Maidment AD
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111912. PubMed ID: 24320445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison study of reconstruction algorithms for prototype digital breast tomosynthesis using various breast phantoms.
Kim YS; Park HS; Lee HH; Choi YW; Choi JG; Kim HH; Kim HJ
Radiol Med; 2016 Feb; 121(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 26383027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of detection of breast calcifications with integrated real-time radiography system (IRRS) during digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-guided vacuum assisted biopsy (VAB): initial single-center experience.
Giambersio E; Depretto C; Trimboli RM; Di Leo G; D'Ascoli E; Della Pepa G; Irmici G; Rabiolo L; Scaperrotta GP
Radiol Med; 2023 Jun; 128(6):699-703. PubMed ID: 37115391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Selective-diffusion regularization for enhancement of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Hadjiiski LM
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):6003-14. PubMed ID: 21158312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical benefits of tomosynthesis-guided vacuum assisted breast biopsy: a comparison with stereotactic vacuum assisted biopsy.
Kasahara M; Kanematsu S; Tanaka Y; Okazaki S; Watatani M
Breast Cancer; 2024 Mar; 31(2):329-334. PubMed ID: 38324059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of point-by-point back projection correction for isocentric motion in digital breast tomosynthesis: relevance to morphology of structures such as microcalcifications.
Chen Y; Lo JY; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2007 Oct; 34(10):3885-92. PubMed ID: 17985634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Calcifications at Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Imaging Features and Biopsy Techniques.
Horvat JV; Keating DM; Rodrigues-Duarte H; Morris EA; Mango VL
Radiographics; 2019; 39(2):307-318. PubMed ID: 30681901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Image quality of microcalcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis: effects of projection-view distributions.
Lu Y; Chan HP; Wei J; Goodsitt M; Carson PL; Hadjiiski L; Schmitz A; Eberhard JW; Claus BE
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5703-12. PubMed ID: 21992385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of super-resolution and image acquisition on the detection of calcifications in digital breast tomosynthesis.
Barufaldi B; Acciavatti RJ; Conant EF; Maidment ADA
Eur Radiol; 2024 Jan; 34(1):193-203. PubMed ID: 37572187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital Mammography Stereotactic Biopsy versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis-guided Biopsy: Differences in Biopsy Targets, Pathologic Results, and Discordance Rates.
Rochat CJ; Baird GL; Lourenco AP
Radiology; 2020 Mar; 294(3):518-527. PubMed ID: 31961261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new image reconstruction method for digital breast tomosynthesis: effects on the visibility of breast lesions and breast density.
Krammer J; Zolotarev S; Hillman I; Karalis K; Stsepankou D; Vengrinovich V; Hesser J; M Svahn T
Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190345. PubMed ID: 31453718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: better image quality for humans and computers.
Rodriguez-Ruiz A; Teuwen J; Vreemann S; Bouwman RW; van Engen RE; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM; Gubern-Merida A; Sechopoulos I
Acta Radiol; 2018 Sep; 59(9):1051-1059. PubMed ID: 29254355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
