These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35185164)
1. Evidence That Selecting an Appropriate Item Response Theory-Based Approach to Scoring Surveys Can Help Avoid Biased Treatment Effect Estimates. Soland J Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):376-403. PubMed ID: 35185164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas. Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Avoiding bias from sum scores in growth estimates: An examination of IRT-based approaches to scoring longitudinal survey responses. Kuhfeld M; Soland J Psychol Methods; 2022 Apr; 27(2):234-260. PubMed ID: 33090818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Scoring assessments in multisite randomized control trials: Examining the sensitivity of treatment effect estimates to measurement choices. Kuhfeld M; Soland J Psychol Methods; 2023 Dec; ():. PubMed ID: 38127570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do Response Styles Affect Estimates of Growth on Social-Emotional Constructs? Evidence from Four Years of Longitudinal Survey Scores. Soland J; Kuhfeld M Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(6):853-873. PubMed ID: 32633574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How survey scoring decisions can influence your study's results: A trip through the IRT looking glass. Soland J; Kuhfeld M; Edwards K Psychol Methods; 2022 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 35834195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. How Scoring Approaches Impact Estimates of Growth in the Presence of Survey Item Ceiling Effects. Edwards KD; Soland J Appl Psychol Meas; 2024 May; 48(3):147-164. PubMed ID: 38585305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability. Zhao Y; Chan W; Lo BC Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2017 Apr; 15(1):60. PubMed ID: 28372559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of unweighted and item response theory-based weighted sum scoring for the Nine-Questions Depression-Rating Scale in the Northern Thai Dialect. Kawilapat S; Maneeton B; Maneeton N; Prasitwattanaseree S; Kongsuk T; Arunpongpaisal S; Leejongpermpoon J; Sukhawaha S; Traisathit P BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Oct; 22(1):268. PubMed ID: 36224520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Psychometric Modelling of Longitudinal Genetically Informative Twin Data. Schwabe I; Gu Z; Tijmstra J; Hatemi P; Pohl S Front Genet; 2019; 10():837. PubMed ID: 31681400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using item response theory to calibrate the Headache Impact Test (HIT) to the metric of traditional headache scales. Bjorner JB; Kosinski M; Ware JE Qual Life Res; 2003 Dec; 12(8):981-1002. PubMed ID: 14651417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Item response theory scoring and the detection of curvilinear relationships. Carter NT; Dalal DK; Guan L; LoPilato AC; Withrow SA Psychol Methods; 2017 Mar; 22(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 27819433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A random item effects generalized partial credit model with a multiple imputation-based scoring procedure. Huang S; Chung S; Cai L Qual Life Res; 2024 Mar; 33(3):637-651. PubMed ID: 37950818 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Item Response Theory Models for Carry-Over Effect Across Different Scales. Jin KY; Wang WC Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Jul; 39(5):406-425. PubMed ID: 29881016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. After Differential Item Functioning Is Detected: IRT Item Calibration and Scoring in the Presence of DIF. Cho SJ; Suh Y; Lee WY Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Nov; 40(8):573-591. PubMed ID: 29881071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory. Dowling NM; Bolt DM; Deng S; Li C BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():63. PubMed ID: 27229310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the impact of calibration of patient-reported outcomes measures on results from randomized clinical trials: a simulation study based on Rasch measurement theory. Loubert A; Regnault A; Sébille V; Hardouin JB BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Aug; 22(1):224. PubMed ID: 35962310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Scoring based on item response theory did not alter the measurement ability of EORTC QLQ-C30 scales. Petersen MA; Groenvold M; Aaronson N; Brenne E; Fayers P; Nielsen JD; Sprangers M; Bjorner JB; J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):902-8. PubMed ID: 16085193 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficiency Analysis of Item Response Theory Kernel Equating for Mixed-Format Tests. Wallmark J; Josefsson M; Wiberg M Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Nov; 47(7-8):496-512. PubMed ID: 38027462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]