BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

195 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35186273)

  • 1. Grant writing and grant peer review as questionable research practices.
    Conix S; De Block A; Vaesen K
    F1000Res; 2021; 10():1126. PubMed ID: 35186273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applying for, reviewing and funding public health research in Germany and beyond.
    Gerhardus A; Becher H; Groenewegen P; Mansmann U; Meyer T; Pfaff H; Puhan M; Razum O; Rehfuess E; Sauerborn R; Strech D; Wissing F; Zeeb H; Hummers-Pradier E
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 Jun; 14(1):43. PubMed ID: 27297230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Writing a Research Grant - 1, Applying for Funding.
    Schembri-Wismayer P; Cuschieri S; Grech V
    Early Hum Dev; 2018 Dec; 127():106-108. PubMed ID: 30077571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. ChatGPT use shows that the grant-application system is broken.
    Parrilla JM
    Nature; 2023 Nov; 623(7986):443. PubMed ID: 37833483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What to do when your grant is rejected.
    Crow JM
    Nature; 2020 Feb; 578(7795):477-479. PubMed ID: 32071452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review of grant applications: criteria used and qualitative study of reviewer practices.
    Abdoul H; Perrey C; Amiel P; Tubach F; Gottot S; Durand-Zaleski I; Alberti C
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e46054. PubMed ID: 23029386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of gender on scientific writing: An observational study of grant proposals.
    Franco MC; Rice DB; Schuch HS; Dellagostin OA; Cenci MS; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Aug; 136():37-43. PubMed ID: 33545271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. WASP (Write a Scientific Paper): Writing a Research Grant - 2, Drafting the Proposal.
    Cuschieri S; Schembri-Wismayer P; Grech V
    Early Hum Dev; 2018 Dec; 127():109-111. PubMed ID: 30077572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A retrospective analysis of the peer review of more than 75,000 Marie Curie proposals between 2007 and 2018.
    Pina DG; Buljan I; Hren D; Marušić A
    Elife; 2021 Jan; 10():. PubMed ID: 33439120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How to write a successful grant application: guidance provided by the European Society of Clinical Pharmacy.
    Weidmann AE; Cadogan CA; Fialová D; Hazen A; Henman M; Lutters M; Okuyan B; Paudyal V; Wirth F
    Int J Clin Pharm; 2023 Jun; 45(3):781-786. PubMed ID: 36877291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Participation and Motivations of Grant Peer Reviewers: A Comprehensive Survey.
    Gallo SA; Thompson LA; Schmaling KB; Glisson SR
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Apr; 26(2):761-782. PubMed ID: 31359327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. It's money! Real-world grant experience through a student-run, peer-reviewed program.
    Dumanis SB; Ullrich L; Washington PM; Forcelli PA
    CBE Life Sci Educ; 2013; 12(3):419-28. PubMed ID: 24006391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An experimental test of the effects of redacting grant applicant identifiers on peer review outcomes.
    Nakamura RK; Mann LS; Lindner MD; Braithwaite J; Chen MC; Vancea A; Byrnes N; Durrant V; Reed B
    Elife; 2021 Oct; 10():. PubMed ID: 34665132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Top ten strategies to enhance grant-writing success.
    Guyer RA; Schwarze ML; Gosain A; Maggard-Gibbons M; Keswani SG; Goldstein AM
    Surgery; 2021 Dec; 170(6):1727-1731. PubMed ID: 34294451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Community-Academic Partnered Grant Writing Series to Build Infrastructure for Partnered Research.
    King KM; Pardo YJ; Norris KC; Diaz-Romero M; Morris D; Vassar SD; Brown AF
    Clin Transl Sci; 2015 Oct; 8(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 26365589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An output evaluation of a health research foundation's enhanced grant review process for new investigators.
    Hammond GW; Lê ML; Novotny T; Caligiuri SPB; Pierce GN; Wade J
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2017 Jun; 15(1):57. PubMed ID: 28629438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An introduction to grant writing: de-mystifying the process.
    Walsh MM; Bowen DM
    J Dent Hyg; 2012; 86(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 22309922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Grant Writing Tips for Translational Research.
    Wescott L; Laskofski M; Senator D; Curran C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1606():367-378. PubMed ID: 28502013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective or predatory funding? Evaluating the hidden costs of grant applications.
    Dresler M; Buddeberg E; Endesfelder U; Haaker J; Hof C; Kretschmer R; Pflüger D; Schmidt F
    Immunol Cell Biol; 2023 Feb; 101(2):104-111. PubMed ID: 36214095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grant-Writing Pearls and Pitfalls: Maximizing Funding Opportunities.
    Liu JC; Pynnonen MA; St John M; Rosenthal EL; Couch ME; Schmalbach CE
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2016 Feb; 154(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 26626133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.