These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35186472)

  • 1. Using virtual reality for anatomical landmark annotation in geometric morphometrics.
    Messer D; Atchapero M; Jensen MB; Svendsen MS; Galatius A; Olsen MT; Frisvad JR; Dahl VA; Conradsen K; Dahl AB; Bærentzen A
    PeerJ; 2022; 10():e12869. PubMed ID: 35186472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurement error using a SeeMaLab structured light 3D scanner against a Microscribe 3D digitizer.
    Messer D; Svendsen MS; Galatius A; Olsen MT; Dahl VA; Conradsen K; Dahl AB
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11804. PubMed ID: 34484981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3D virtual reality vs. 2D desktop registration user interface comparison.
    Bueckle A; Buehling K; Shih PC; Börner K
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(10):e0258103. PubMed ID: 34705835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital restoration of fragmentary human skeletal remains: Testing the feasibility of virtual reality.
    Jurda M; Urbanová P; Chmelík J
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2019 Aug; 66():50-57. PubMed ID: 31220789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Virtual dissection of the real brain: integration of photographic 3D models into virtual reality and its effect on neurosurgical resident education.
    Roh TH; Oh JW; Jang CK; Choi S; Kim EH; Hong CK; Kim SH
    Neurosurg Focus; 2021 Aug; 51(2):E16. PubMed ID: 34333482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing virtual reality, desktop-based 3D, and 2D versions of a category learning experiment.
    Barrett RCA; Poe R; O'Camb JW; Woodruff C; Harrison SM; Dolguikh K; Chuong C; Klassen AD; Zhang R; Joseph RB; Blair MR
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(10):e0275119. PubMed ID: 36201546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of virtual reality to assess the bony landmarks at the knee joint - The role of imaging modality and the assessor's experience.
    Castille J; Remy S; Vermue H; Victor J
    Knee; 2024 Jan; 46():41-51. PubMed ID: 38061164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automatic landmark annotation in 3D surface scans of skulls: Methodological proposal and reliability study.
    Bermejo E; Taniguchi K; Ogawa Y; Martos R; Valsecchi A; Mesejo P; Ibáñez O; Imaizumi K
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2021 Oct; 210():106380. PubMed ID: 34478914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Landmark Typology in Applied Morphometrics Studies: What's the Point?
    Wärmländer SKTS; Garvin H; Guyomarc'h P; Petaros A; Sholts SB
    Anat Rec (Hoboken); 2019 Jul; 302(7):1144-1153. PubMed ID: 30365240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Landmark precision and reliability and accuracy of linear distances estimated by using 3D computed micro-tomography and the open-source TINA Manual Landmarking Tool software.
    Simon MN; Marroig G
    Front Zool; 2015; 12():12. PubMed ID: 26120349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can virtual reality improve traditional anatomy education programmes? A mixed-methods study on the use of a 3D skull model.
    Chen S; Zhu J; Cheng C; Pan Z; Liu L; Du J; Shen X; Shen Z; Zhu H; Liu J; Yang H; Ma C; Pan H
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 20(1):395. PubMed ID: 33129310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing Methods to Assess Intraobserver Measurement Error of 3D Craniofacial Landmarks Using Geometric Morphometrics Through a Digitizer Arm.
    Menéndez LP
    J Forensic Sci; 2017 May; 62(3):741-746. PubMed ID: 27874192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Range-wide variation in grey seal (Halichoerus grypus) skull morphology.
    Galatius A; Svendsen MS; Messer D; Valtonen M; McGowen M; Sabin R; Dahl VA; Dahl AB; Olsen MT
    Zoology (Jena); 2022 Aug; 153():126023. PubMed ID: 35717730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reality of virtual anthropology: Comparing digitizer and laser scan data collection methods for the quantitative assessment of the cranium.
    Algee-Hewitt BF; Wheat AD
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2016 May; 160(1):148-55. PubMed ID: 26714825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MiCellAnnGELo: annotate microscopy time series of complex cell surfaces with 3D virtual reality.
    Platt A; Lutton EJ; Offord E; Bretschneider T
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36629475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Virtual reality simulation training for health professions trainees in gastrointestinal endoscopy.
    Khan R; Plahouras J; Johnston BC; Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Walsh CM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2018 Aug; 8(8):CD008237. PubMed ID: 30117156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Randomized study comparing 3D virtual reality and conventional 2D on-screen teaching of cerebrovascular anatomy.
    Greuter L; De Rosa A; Cattin P; Croci DM; Soleman J; Guzman R
    Neurosurg Focus; 2021 Aug; 51(2):E18. PubMed ID: 34333473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Creating 3D models from Radiologic Images for Virtual Reality Medical Education Modules.
    Ammanuel S; Brown I; Uribe J; Rehani B
    J Med Syst; 2019 May; 43(6):166. PubMed ID: 31053902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Principles and methods of geometric morphometrics].
    Pavlinov IIa; Mikeshina NG
    Zh Obshch Biol; 2002; 63(6):473-93. PubMed ID: 12510587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. PTVR - A software in Python to make virtual reality experiments easier to build and more reproducible.
    Castet E; Termoz-Masson J; Vizcay S; Delachambre J; Myrodia V; Aguilar C; Matonti F; Kornprobst P
    J Vis; 2024 Apr; 24(4):19. PubMed ID: 38652657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.