These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35187157)

  • 1. Comparison of the Hardness of Novel Experimental Vinyl Poly Siloxane (VPS) Impression Materials with Commercially Available Ones.
    Ud Din S; Chaudhary FA; Ahmed B; Alam MK; Parker S; Patel M; Javed MQ
    Biomed Res Int; 2022; 2022():1703869. PubMed ID: 35187157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of cross-linking agent and surfactant on the tear strength of novel vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Patel M
    Dent Mater; 2018 Dec; 34(12):e334-e343. PubMed ID: 30318115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of impression removal force with elastomeric impression material rigidity and hardness.
    Walker MP; Alderman N; Petrie CS; Melander J; McGuire J
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Jul; 22(5):362-6. PubMed ID: 23387301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Experimental hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials incorporating a novel surfactant compared with commercial VPS.
    Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Tomlins P; Patel M
    Dent Mater; 2017 Aug; 33(8):e301-e309. PubMed ID: 28535951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the elastic recovery and strain-in-compression of commercial and novel vinyl polysiloxane impression materials incorporating a novel crosslinking agent and a surfactant.
    Ud Din S; Khattak O; Chaudhary FA; Saeed A; Iqbal A; Syed J; Kensara AA; Alsharari T; Mustafa M; Sultan SE; Patel M
    PeerJ; 2023; 11():e15677. PubMed ID: 37520257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between Shore hardness of elastomeric dental materials and Young's modulus.
    Meththananda IM; Parker S; Patel MP; Braden M
    Dent Mater; 2009 Aug; 25(8):956-9. PubMed ID: 19286248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Improved water absorption behaviour of experimental hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane (VPS) impression materials incorporating a crosslinking agent and a novel surfactant.
    Ud Din S; Parker S; Braden M; Patel M
    Dent Mater; 2021 Jun; 37(6):1054-1065. PubMed ID: 33888340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hydrophilic poly(vinyl siloxane) impression materials: dimensional accuracy, wettability, and effect on gypsum hardness.
    Panichuttra R; Jones RM; Goodacre C; Munoz CA; Moore BK
    Int J Prosthodont; 1991; 4(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 1810315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of different fillers on the properties of an experimental vinyl polysiloxane.
    Meincke DK; Ogliari Ade O; Ogliari FA
    Braz Oral Res; 2016; 30():. PubMed ID: 27050939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of glow-discharge and surfactant treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Erkut S; Can G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):356-63. PubMed ID: 15798686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials.
    Chai J; Tan E; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):538-42. PubMed ID: 7748448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Sadan A
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 17(5):310. PubMed ID: 16121746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of flow profile of commercially available vinyl polysiloxane impression materials - An
    Madhusudanan M; Shenoy VK; Khan JA; Mehendale AV; Bangera MK
    Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(4):430-434. PubMed ID: 37006010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Setting characteristics of vinyl-polysiloxane interocclusal recording materials.
    Hatzi P; Tzakis M; Eliades G
    Dent Mater; 2012 Jul; 28(7):783-91. PubMed ID: 22572539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: an in vitro study.
    Lee H; Ercoli C; Funkenbusch PD; Feng C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 18262011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Temperature effects on the rheological properties of current polyether and polysiloxane impression materials during setting.
    Berg JC; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Adán-Plaza S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 12886208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of surface treatments on the wettability of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Kess RS; Combe EC; Sparks BS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 10898846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.