200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35188638)
1. In Silico Models for Skin Sensitization and Irritation.
Selvestrel G; Robino F; Russo MZ
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2425():291-354. PubMed ID: 35188638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current EU regulatory requirements for the assessment of chemicals and cosmetic products: challenges and opportunities for introducing new approach methodologies.
Pistollato F; Madia F; Corvi R; Munn S; Grignard E; Paini A; Worth A; Bal-Price A; Prieto P; Casati S; Berggren E; Bopp SK; Zuang V
Arch Toxicol; 2021 Jun; 95(6):1867-1897. PubMed ID: 33851225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-animal methods to predict skin sensitization (II): an assessment of defined approaches
Kleinstreuer NC; Hoffmann S; Alépée N; Allen D; Ashikaga T; Casey W; Clouet E; Cluzel M; Desprez B; Gellatly N; Göbel C; Kern PS; Klaric M; Kühnl J; Martinozzi-Teissier S; Mewes K; Miyazawa M; Strickland J; van Vliet E; Zang Q; Petersohn D
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 May; 48(5):359-374. PubMed ID: 29474122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An overview of current practices for regulatory risk assessment with lessons learnt from cosmetics in the European Union.
Arnesdotter E; Rogiers V; Vanhaecke T; Vinken M
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2021 May; 51(5):395-417. PubMed ID: 34352182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Alternative in vitro models used in the main safety tests of cosmetic products and new challenges.
Filaire E; Nachat-Kappes R; Laporte C; Harmand MF; Simon M; Poinsot C
Int J Cosmet Sci; 2022 Dec; 44(6):604-613. PubMed ID: 35842748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Applications of reconstructed skin models in pharmaco-toxicological trials.
Damour O; Augustin C; Black AF
Med Biol Eng Comput; 1998 Nov; 36(6):825-32. PubMed ID: 10367477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computational approaches for skin sensitization prediction.
Wilm A; Kühnl J; Kirchmair J
Crit Rev Toxicol; 2018 Oct; 48(9):738-760. PubMed ID: 30488745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternatives to the use of animals in safety testing as required by the EU-Cosmetics Directive 2009.
Vogel R
ALTEX; 2009; 26(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 19907908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Beyond dermal exposure: The respiratory tract as a target organ in hazard assessments of cosmetic ingredients.
Thá EL; Canavez ADPM; Schuck DC; Gagosian VSC; Lorencini M; Leme DM
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2021 Aug; 124():104976. PubMed ID: 34139277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use and interpretation of in vitro data in regulatory toxicology: cosmetics, toiletries and household products.
Indans I
Toxicol Lett; 2002 Feb; 127(1-3):177-82. PubMed ID: 12052656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Combinative
Banerjee P; Ulker OC
Toxicol Mech Methods; 2022 Sep; 32(7):542-548. PubMed ID: 35287538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Industry experience with alternative methods.
LeClaire J; de Silva O
Toxicol Lett; 1998 Dec; 102-103():575-9. PubMed ID: 10022316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A tiered approach to the use of alternatives to animal testing for the safety assessment of cosmetics: skin irritation.
Macfarlane M; Jones P; Goebel C; Dufour E; Rowland J; Araki D; Costabel-Farkas M; Hewitt NJ; Hibatallah J; Kirst A; McNamee P; Schellauf F; Scheel J
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2009 Jul; 54(2):188-96. PubMed ID: 19393278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel technologies and an overall strategy to allow hazard assessment and risk prediction of chemicals, cosmetics, and drugs with animal-free methods.
Leist M; Lidbury BA; Yang C; Hayden PJ; Kelm JM; Ringeissen S; Detroyer A; Meunier JR; Rathman JF; Jackson GR; Stolper G; Hasiwa N
ALTEX; 2012; 29(4):373-88. PubMed ID: 23138508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Current opinion on risk assessment of cosmetics.
Kim KB; Kwack SJ; Lee JY; Kacew S; Lee BM
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2021 May; 24(4):137-161. PubMed ID: 33832410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. STopTox: An
Borba JVB; Alves VM; Braga RC; Korn DR; Overdahl K; Silva AC; Hall SUS; Overdahl E; Kleinstreuer N; Strickland J; Allen D; Andrade CH; Muratov EN; Tropsha A
Environ Health Perspect; 2022 Feb; 130(2):27012. PubMed ID: 35192406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Amended final report on the safety assessment of glyceryl dilaurate, glyceryl diarachidate, glyceryl dibehenate, glyceryl dierucate, glyceryl dihydroxystearate, glyceryl diisopalmitate, glyceryl diisostearate, glyceryl dilinoleate, glyceryl dimyristate, glyceryl dioleate, glyceryl diricinoleate, glyceryl dipalmitate, glyceryl dipalmitoleate, glyceryl distearate, glyceryl palmitate lactate, glyceryl stearate citrate, glyceryl stearate lactate, and glyceryl stearate succinate.
Int J Toxicol; 2007; 26 Suppl 3():1-30. PubMed ID: 18273450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Safety assessment of Salicylic Acid, Butyloctyl Salicylate, Calcium Salicylate, C12-15 Alkyl Salicylate, Capryloyl Salicylic Acid, Hexyldodecyl Salicylate, Isocetyl Salicylate, Isodecyl Salicylate, Magnesium Salicylate, MEA-Salicylate, Ethylhexyl Salicylate, Potassium Salicylate, Methyl Salicylate, Myristyl Salicylate, Sodium Salicylate, TEA-Salicylate, and Tridecyl Salicylate.
Cosmetic Ingredient Review Expert Panel
Int J Toxicol; 2003; 22 Suppl 3():1-108. PubMed ID: 14617432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrated decision-tree testing strategies for skin corrosion and irritation with respect to the requirements of the EU REACH legislation.
Grindon C; Combes R; Cronin MT; Roberts DW; Garrod JF
Altern Lab Anim; 2008 Oct; 36 Suppl 1():65-74. PubMed ID: 19025332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An in vitro method for detecting chemical sensitization using human reconstructed skin models and its applicability to cosmetic, pharmaceutical, and medical device safety testing.
McKim JM; Keller DJ; Gorski JR
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2012 Dec; 31(4):292-305. PubMed ID: 22494060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
