These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35188781)
1. Assessing the Performance of Screening MM/PBSA in Protein-Ligand Interactions. Zhu YX; Sheng YJ; Ma YQ; Ding HM J Phys Chem B; 2022 Mar; 126(8):1700-1708. PubMed ID: 35188781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving the Performance of MM/PBSA in Protein-Protein Interactions via the Screening Electrostatic Energy. Sheng YJ; Yin YW; Ma YQ; Ding HM J Chem Inf Model; 2021 May; 61(5):2454-2462. PubMed ID: 33939423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Prediction reliability of binding affinities and binding poses for RNA-ligand complexes. Jiang D; Du H; Zhao H; Deng Y; Wu Z; Wang J; Zeng Y; Zhang H; Wang X; Wang E; Hou T; Hsieh CY Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2024 Mar; 26(13):10323-10335. PubMed ID: 38501198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 1. The accuracy of binding free energy calculations based on molecular dynamics simulations. Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jan; 51(1):69-82. PubMed ID: 21117705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the performance of the molecular mechanics/Poisson Boltzmann surface area and molecular mechanics/generalized Born surface area methods. II. The accuracy of ranking poses generated from docking. Hou T; Wang J; Li Y; Wang W J Comput Chem; 2011 Apr; 32(5):866-77. PubMed ID: 20949517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Including explicit water molecules as part of the protein structure in MM/PBSA calculations. Zhu YL; Beroza P; Artis DR J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Feb; 54(2):462-9. PubMed ID: 24432790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. PBSA_E: A PBSA-Based Free Energy Estimator for Protein-Ligand Binding Affinity. Liu X; Liu J; Zhu T; Zhang L; He X; Zhang JZ J Chem Inf Model; 2016 May; 56(5):854-61. PubMed ID: 27088302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparative Linear Interaction Energy and MM/PBSA Study on SIRT1-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculation. Rifai EA; van Dijk M; Vermeulen NPE; Yanuar A; Geerke DP J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Sep; 59(9):4018-4033. PubMed ID: 31461271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating the performance of MM/PBSA for binding affinity prediction using class A GPCR crystal structures. Yau MQ; Emtage AL; Chan NJY; Doughty SW; Loo JSE J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 May; 33(5):487-496. PubMed ID: 30989574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 10. Impacts of enhanced sampling and variable dielectric model on protein-protein Interactions. Wang E; Weng G; Sun H; Du H; Zhu F; Chen F; Wang Z; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2019 Sep; 21(35):18958-18969. PubMed ID: 31453590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing the performance of the MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 6. Capability to predict protein-protein binding free energies and re-rank binding poses generated by protein-protein docking. Chen F; Liu H; Sun H; Pan P; Li Y; Li D; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 Aug; 18(32):22129-39. PubMed ID: 27444142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of end-point continuum-solvation methods for the calculation of protein-ligand binding free energies. Genheden S; Ryde U Proteins; 2012 May; 80(5):1326-42. PubMed ID: 22274991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of an automated procedure for the prediction of relative free energies of binding on a set of aldose reductase inhibitors. Ferrari AM; Degliesposti G; Sgobba M; Rastelli G Bioorg Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 15(24):7865-77. PubMed ID: 17870536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 4. Accuracies of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methodologies evaluated by various simulation protocols using PDBbind data set. Sun H; Li Y; Tian S; Xu L; Hou T Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2014 Aug; 16(31):16719-29. PubMed ID: 24999761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An accurate free energy estimator: based on MM/PBSA combined with interaction entropy for protein-ligand binding affinity. Huang K; Luo S; Cong Y; Zhong S; Zhang JZH; Duan L Nanoscale; 2020 May; 12(19):10737-10750. PubMed ID: 32388542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the performance of MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods. 3. The impact of force fields and ligand charge models. Xu L; Sun H; Li Y; Wang J; Hou T J Phys Chem B; 2013 Jul; 117(28):8408-21. PubMed ID: 23789789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Absolute binding free energy calculations: on the accuracy of computational scoring of protein-ligand interactions. Singh N; Warshel A Proteins; 2010 May; 78(7):1705-23. PubMed ID: 20186976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Evaluation of MM/GBSA Based on a Variable Dielectric GB Model for Predicting Protein-Ligand Binding Affinities. Wang E; Liu H; Wang J; Weng G; Sun H; Wang Z; Kang Y; Hou T J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5353-5365. PubMed ID: 32175734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations. Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Molecular dynamics investigation on a series of HIV protease inhibitors: assessing the performance of MM-PBSA and MM-GBSA approaches. Srivastava HK; Sastry GN J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Nov; 52(11):3088-98. PubMed ID: 23121465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]