203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35189226)
1. Resolving an Open Science-policy question: Should the LNT still be an omnibus regulatory assumption?
Ricci PF; Calabrese EJ
Sci Total Environ; 2022 Jun; 825():153917. PubMed ID: 35189226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ionizing radiations epidemiology does not support the LNT model.
Ricci PF; Tharmalingam S
Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():128-140. PubMed ID: 30763555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. From Muller to mechanism: How LNT became the default model for cancer risk assessment.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Pollut; 2018 Oct; 241():289-302. PubMed ID: 29843011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-dose radiation risk extrapolation fallacy associated with the linear-no-threshold model.
Scott BR
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):163-8. PubMed ID: 18480143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Linear-no-threshold is a radiation-protection standard rather than a mechanistic effect model.
Breckow J
Radiat Environ Biophys; 2006 Mar; 44(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 16468065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm.
Okonkwo UC; Ohagwu CC; Aronu ME; Okafor CE; Idumah CI; Okokpujie IP; Chukwu NN; Chukwunyelu CE
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Nov; 253-254():106984. PubMed ID: 36057228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations.
Calabrese EJ
Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():6-25. PubMed ID: 30763547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The debate on the use of linear no threshold for assessing the effects of low doses.
Tubiana M; Aurengo A; Averbeck D; Masse R
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):317-24. PubMed ID: 16926474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Linear non-threshold (LNT) fails numerous toxicological stress tests: Implications for continued policy use.
Calabrese EJ
Chem Biol Interact; 2022 Sep; 365():110064. PubMed ID: 35940280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. LNT--an apparent rather than a real controversy?
Charles MW
J Radiol Prot; 2006 Sep; 26(3):325-9. PubMed ID: 16926475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular biology, epidemiology, and the demise of the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis.
Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
C R Acad Sci III; 1999; 322(2-3):197-204. PubMed ID: 10196673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The scientific basis for the use of the linear no-threshold (LNT) model at low doses and dose rates in radiological protection.
Laurier D; Billarand Y; Klokov D; Leuraud K
J Radiol Prot; 2023 Jun; 43(2):. PubMed ID: 37339605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
Mossman KL
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation?
Averbeck D
Health Phys; 2009 Nov; 97(5):493-504. PubMed ID: 19820459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Cancer incidence and mortality after low-dose radiation exposure: epidemiological aspects].
Vaĭserman A; Mekhova LV; Koshel' NM; Voĭtenko VP
Radiats Biol Radioecol; 2010; 50(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 21434396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The threshold vs LNT showdown: Dose rate findings exposed flaws in the LNT model part 2. How a mistake led BEIR I to adopt LNT.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2017 Apr; 154():452-458. PubMed ID: 27974149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dose response and risk assessment: Evolutionary foundations.
Calabrese EJ; Yazji Shamoun D; Agathokleous E
Environ Pollut; 2022 Sep; 309():119787. PubMed ID: 35850315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here?
Mossman KL
Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):279-84; discussion 300. PubMed ID: 9547494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
