BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35189612)

  • 1. Towards single-trial classification of invasively recorded auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant users.
    Bauernfeind G; Teschner MJ; Wriessnegger SC; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Haumann S
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Mar; 19(2):. PubMed ID: 35189612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Epidural recordings in cochlear implant users.
    Haumann S; Bauernfeind G; Teschner MJ; Schierholz I; Bleichner MG; Büchner A; Lenarz T
    J Neural Eng; 2019 Jul; 16(5):056008. PubMed ID: 31042688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Towards decoding selective attention through cochlear implant electrodes as sensors in subjects with contralateral acoustic hearing.
    Aldag N; Büchner A; Lenarz T; Nogueira W
    J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 35062007
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials Recorded From Nucleus Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
    Brown CJ; Jeon EK; Chiou LK; Kirby B; Karsten SA; Turner CW; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):723-32. PubMed ID: 26295607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Impact of Patient Factors on Objective Cochlear Implant Verification Using Acoustic Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials.
    Bogdanov C; Mulders WHAM; Goulios H; Távora-Vieira D
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(2):96-106. PubMed ID: 37690449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neurophysiology of cochlear implant users II: comparison among speech perception, dynamic range, and physiological measures.
    Firszt JB; Chambers And RD; Kraus N
    Ear Hear; 2002 Dec; 23(6):516-31. PubMed ID: 12476089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparative Analysis of Cortical Auditory Evoked Potential in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Távora-Vieira D; Mandruzzato G; Polak M; Truong B; Stutley A
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1755-1769. PubMed ID: 34172688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory cortical activity to different voice onset times in cochlear implant users.
    Han JH; Zhang F; Kadis DS; Houston LM; Samy RN; Smith ML; Dimitrijevic A
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):1603-1617. PubMed ID: 26616545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Restoration of cortical symmetry and binaural function: Cortical auditory evoked responses in adult cochlear implant users with single sided deafness.
    Wedekind A; Rajan G; Van Dun B; Távora-Vieira D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(1):e0227371. PubMed ID: 31935234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cortical auditory evoked potential (CAEP) and behavioural measures of auditory function in a child with a single-sided deafness.
    Cañete OM; Purdy SC; Neeff M; Brown CRS; Thorne PR
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2017 Nov; 18(6):335-346. PubMed ID: 28922984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinically recorded cortical auditory evoked potentials from paediatric cochlear implant users fitted with electrically elicited stapedius reflex thresholds.
    Kosaner J; Van Dun B; Yigit O; Gultekin M; Bayguzina S
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 May; 108():100-112. PubMed ID: 29605337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward Automated Cochlear Implant Fitting Procedures Based on Event-Related Potentials.
    Finke M; Billinger M; Büchner A
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):e118-e127. PubMed ID: 27787394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective measures of electrode discrimination with electrically evoked auditory change complex and speech-perception abilities in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.
    He S; Grose JH; Teagle HF; Buchman CA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):e63-74. PubMed ID: 24231629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception and cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders.
    Alvarenga KF; Amorim RB; Agostinho-Pesse RS; Costa OA; Nascimento LT; Bevilacqua MC
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Sep; 76(9):1332-8. PubMed ID: 22796193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do the minimum and maximum comfortable stimulation levels influence the cortical potential latencies or the speech recognition in adult cochlear implant users?
    Martins KVC; Goffi-Gomez MVS; Tsuji RK; Bento RF
    Hear Res; 2021 May; 404():108206. PubMed ID: 33677193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Features of beta-gamma phase-amplitude coupling in cochlear implant users derived from EEG.
    Wang S; Li C; Liu Y; Wang M; Lin M; Yang L; Chen Y; Wang Y; Fu X; Zhang X; Wang S
    Hear Res; 2023 Feb; 428():108668. PubMed ID: 36543037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant listeners via single electrode stimulation in relation to speech perception.
    Liebscher T; Alberter K; Hoppe U
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Dec; 57(12):933-940. PubMed ID: 30295156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P; Eichele T; Buechler M; Debener S; Jäncke L; Dillier N; Hugdahl K; Meyer M
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Cochlear implant in children: rational, indications and cost/efficacy].
    Martini A; Bovo R; Trevisi P; Forli F; Berrettini S
    Minerva Pediatr; 2013 Jun; 65(3):325-39. PubMed ID: 23685383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.