These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35189634)

  • 1. Systematic evaluation of computational tools to predict the effects of mutations on protein stability in the absence of experimental structures.
    Pan Q; Nguyen TB; Ascher DB; Pires DEV
    Brief Bioinform; 2022 Mar; 23(2):. PubMed ID: 35189634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the performance of computational predictors for estimating protein stability changes upon missense mutations.
    Iqbal S; Li F; Akutsu T; Ascher DB; Webb GI; Song J
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 Nov; 22(6):. PubMed ID: 34058752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance of protein stability predictors.
    Khan S; Vihinen M
    Hum Mutat; 2010 Jun; 31(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 20232415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PremPS: Predicting the impact of missense mutations on protein stability.
    Chen Y; Lu H; Zhang N; Zhu Z; Wang S; Li M
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2020 Dec; 16(12):e1008543. PubMed ID: 33378330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computational tools help improve protein stability but with a solubility tradeoff.
    Broom A; Jacobi Z; Trainor K; Meiering EM
    J Biol Chem; 2017 Sep; 292(35):14349-14361. PubMed ID: 28710274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Best templates outperform homology models in predicting the impact of mutations on protein stability.
    Pak MA; Ivankov DN
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Sep; 38(18):4312-4320. PubMed ID: 35894930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing computational tools for predicting protein stability changes upon missense mutations using a new dataset.
    Zheng F; Liu Y; Yang Y; Wen Y; Li M
    Protein Sci; 2024 Jan; 33(1):e4861. PubMed ID: 38084013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing computational methods for predicting protein stability upon mutation: good on average but not in the details.
    Potapov V; Cohen M; Schreiber G
    Protein Eng Des Sel; 2009 Sep; 22(9):553-60. PubMed ID: 19561092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prediction and interpretation of deleterious coding variants in terms of protein structural stability.
    Ancien F; Pucci F; Godfroid M; Rooman M
    Sci Rep; 2018 Mar; 8(1):4480. PubMed ID: 29540703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold2 applications.
    Akdel M; Pires DEV; Pardo EP; Jänes J; Zalevsky AO; Mészáros B; Bryant P; Good LL; Laskowski RA; Pozzati G; Shenoy A; Zhu W; Kundrotas P; Serra VR; Rodrigues CHM; Dunham AS; Burke D; Borkakoti N; Velankar S; Frost A; Basquin J; Lindorff-Larsen K; Bateman A; Kajava AV; Valencia A; Ovchinnikov S; Durairaj J; Ascher DB; Thornton JM; Davey NE; Stein A; Elofsson A; Croll TI; Beltrao P
    Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2022 Nov; 29(11):1056-1067. PubMed ID: 36344848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond the Twilight Zone: automated prediction of structural properties of proteins by recursive neural networks and remote homology information.
    Mooney C; Pollastri G
    Proteins; 2009 Oct; 77(1):181-90. PubMed ID: 19422056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing predictors of changes in protein stability upon mutation using self-consistency.
    Thiltgen G; Goldstein RA
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46084. PubMed ID: 23144695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Model Structures on Predictors of Protein Stability Changes from Single-Point Mutations.
    Rollo C; Pancotti C; Birolo G; Rossi I; Sanavia T; Fariselli P
    Genes (Basel); 2023 Dec; 14(12):. PubMed ID: 38137050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Predicting the stability of mutant proteins by computational approaches: an overview.
    Marabotti A; Scafuri B; Facchiano A
    Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32496523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of impacts of mutations on protein structure and interactions: SDM, a statistical approach, and mCSM, using machine learning.
    Pandurangan AP; Blundell TL
    Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):247-257. PubMed ID: 31693276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computational Protein Design Through Grafting and Stabilization.
    Zhu C; Mowrey DD; Dokholyan NV
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1529():227-241. PubMed ID: 27914054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational protein design: validation and possible relevance as a tool for homology searching and fold recognition.
    Schmidt Am Busch M; Sedano A; Simonson T
    PLoS One; 2010 May; 5(5):e10410. PubMed ID: 20463972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Towards sequence-based prediction of mutation-induced stability changes in unseen non-homologous proteins.
    Folkman L; Stantic B; Sattar A
    BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S4. PubMed ID: 24564514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Exploring Protein Supersecondary Structure Through Changes in Protein Folding, Stability, and Flexibility.
    Pires DEV; Rodrigues CHM; Albanaz ATS; Karmakar M; Myung Y; Xavier J; Michanetzi EM; Portelli S; Ascher DB
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1958():173-185. PubMed ID: 30945219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ab initio and template-based prediction of multi-class distance maps by two-dimensional recursive neural networks.
    Walsh I; Baù D; Martin AJ; Mooney C; Vullo A; Pollastri G
    BMC Struct Biol; 2009 Jan; 9():5. PubMed ID: 19183478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.