240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35191320)
1. In-Hospital Complications in Pregnancies Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Wu P; Sharma GV; Mehta LS; Chew-Graham CA; Lundberg GP; Nerenberg KA; Graham MM; Chappell LC; Kadam UT; Jordan KP; Mamas MA
J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 Mar; 11(5):e022658. PubMed ID: 35191320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Complications and adverse outcomes in pregnancy and childbirth among women who conceived by assisted reproductive technologies: a nationwide birth cohort study of Japan environment and children's study.
Nagata C; Yang L; Yamamoto-Hanada K; Mezawa H; Ayabe T; Ishizuka K; Konishi M; Ohya Y; Saito H; Sago H;
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Feb; 19(1):77. PubMed ID: 30786865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance — United States, 2012.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Aug; 64(6):1-29. PubMed ID: 26270152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Time trends in placenta-mediated pregnancy complications after assisted reproductive technology in the Nordic countries.
Petersen SH; Bergh C; Gissler M; Åsvold BO; Romundstad LB; Tiitinen A; Spangmose AL; Pinborg A; Wennerholm UB; Henningsen AA; Opdahl S
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 223(2):226.e1-226.e19. PubMed ID: 32109461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies conceived via assisted reproductive technology complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study.
Kouhkan A; Khamseh ME; Pirjani R; Moini A; Arabipoor A; Maroufizadeh S; Hosseini R; Baradaran HR
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2018 Dec; 18(1):495. PubMed ID: 30547777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2011.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2014 Nov; 63(10):1-28. PubMed ID: 25412164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance -
United States, 2013.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford SB; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Warner L; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2015 Dec; 64(11):1-25. PubMed ID: 26633040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Perinatal complications and live-birth outcomes following assisted reproductive technology: a retrospective cohort study.
Lei LL; Lan YL; Wang SY; Feng W; Zhai ZJ
Chin Med J (Engl); 2019 Oct; 132(20):2408-2416. PubMed ID: 31634242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance -- United States, 2010.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Crawford S; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2013 Dec; 62(9):1-24. PubMed ID: 24304902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of assisted reproductive technologies on maternal and neonatal outcomes in early preterm deliveries.
Di Tommaso M; Sisti G; Colombi I; Seravalli V; Magro Malosso ER; Vannuccini S; Petraglia F
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 48(10):845-848. PubMed ID: 30898633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance - United States, 2018.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Zhang Y; Jewett A; Boulet SL; Warner L; Kroelinger CD; Barfield WD
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2022 Feb; 71(4):1-19. PubMed ID: 35176012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies may be related to maternal factors associated with infertility rather than the type of assisted reproductive technology procedure used.
Hayashi M; Nakai A; Satoh S; Matsuda Y
Fertil Steril; 2012 Oct; 98(4):922-8. PubMed ID: 22763098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2009.
Sunderam S; Kissin DM; Flowers L; Anderson JE; Folger SG; Jamieson DJ; Barfield WD;
MMWR Surveill Summ; 2012 Nov; 61(7):1-23. PubMed ID: 23114281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assisted reproductive technology and risk of adverse obstetric outcomes in dichorionic twin pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Qin JB; Wang H; Sheng X; Xie Q; Gao S
Fertil Steril; 2016 May; 105(5):1180-1192. PubMed ID: 26801066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Obstetric outcomes for twins from different conception methods - A multicenter cross-sectional study from China.
Jiang F; Gao J; He J; Tang Y; Cao Y; Wang X; Liu X; Wang T; Liu X; Sun J; Zhong M; Liu X; Liao S; Liu C; Yang J
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2021 Jun; 100(6):1061-1067. PubMed ID: 33556189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The PLART study: incidence of preterm labor and adverse pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive techniques-a retrospective cohort study.
Santi E; Nencini G; Cerni A; Greco P; Spelzini F; Tormettino B; Scioscia M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Oct; 300(4):911-916. PubMed ID: 31520257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maternal and child-health outcomes in pregnancies following Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART): a prospective cohort study.
da Silva SG; da Silveira MF; Bertoldi AD; Domingues MR; Dos Santos IDS
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Feb; 20(1):106. PubMed ID: 32079534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maternal and perinatal outcomes in spontaneous versus assisted conception twin pregnancies.
Caserta D; Bordi G; Stegagno M; Filippini F; Podagrosi M; Roselli D; Moscarini M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Mar; 174():64-9. PubMed ID: 24405729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ovulation induction and subfertile untreated conception groups offer improved options for interpreting risks associated with ART.
Hansen M; Hart RJ; Milne E; Bower C; Walls ML; Yovich JL; Burton P; Liu Y; Barblett H; Kemp-Casey A
J Assist Reprod Genet; 2024 Apr; 41(4):915-928. PubMed ID: 38470554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pregnancy outcomes after assisted human reproduction.
Okun N; Sierra S; ;
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2014 Jan; 36(1):64-83. PubMed ID: 24444289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
