165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35191727)
1. Making utilitarian choices but giving deontological advice.
Polman E; Ruttan RL
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2022 Oct; 151(10):2614-2621. PubMed ID: 35191727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
Kahane G
Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
Conway P; Gawronski B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contingencies of self-worth and the strength of deontological and utilitarian inclinations.
Macko A
J Soc Psychol; 2021 Nov; 161(6):664-682. PubMed ID: 33357143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hippocampal Damage Increases Deontological Responses during Moral Decision Making.
McCormick C; Rosenthal CR; Miller TD; Maguire EA
J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 36(48):12157-12167. PubMed ID: 27903725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Awareness to utilitarian responses in later life: An ERP study with moral dilemmas.
Fernandes C; Pasion R; Gonçalves AR; Almeida R; Garcez H; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
Neurosci Lett; 2022 Sep; 787():136824. PubMed ID: 35917838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Not all who ponder count costs: Arithmetic reflection predicts utilitarian tendencies, but logical reflection predicts both deontological and utilitarian tendencies.
Byrd N; Conway P
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103995. PubMed ID: 31301587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are 'counter-intuitive' deontological judgments really counter-intuitive? An empirical reply to.
Paxton JM; Bruni T; Greene JD
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2014 Sep; 9(9):1368-71. PubMed ID: 23887818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mirror, mirror, on the wall, who is deontological? Completing moral dilemmas in front of mirrors increases deontological but not utilitarian response tendencies.
Reynolds CJ; Knighten KR; Conway P
Cognition; 2019 Nov; 192():103993. PubMed ID: 31229738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Moral hypocrisy on the basis of construal level: to be a utilitarian personal decision maker or to be a moral advisor?
Xiao W; Wu Q; Yang Q; Zhou L; Jiang Y; Zhang J; Miao D; Peng J
PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0117540. PubMed ID: 25689521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Moral Judgment and Empathic/Deontological Guilt.
Migliore S; D'Aurizio G; Parisi F; Maffi S; Squitieri B; Curcio G; Mancini F
Psychol Rep; 2019 Aug; 122(4):1395-1411. PubMed ID: 30025498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
Gawronski B; Armstrong J; Conway P; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):343-376. PubMed ID: 28816493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The intuitive greater good: Testing the corrective dual process model of moral cognition.
Bago B; De Neys W
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Oct; 148(10):1782-1801. PubMed ID: 30550336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gender differences in responses to moral dilemmas: a process dissociation analysis.
Friesdorf R; Conway P; Gawronski B
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2015 May; 41(5):696-713. PubMed ID: 25840987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. (How) Do You Regret Killing One to Save Five? Affective and Cognitive Regret Differ After Utilitarian and Deontological Decisions.
Goldstein-Greenwood J; Conway P; Summerville A; Johnson BN
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Sep; 46(9):1303-1317. PubMed ID: 31989859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment.
Park G; Kappes A; Rho Y; Van Bavel JJ
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2016 Oct; 11(10):1588-96. PubMed ID: 27317926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Not just bad actions: Affective concern for bad outcomes contributes to moral condemnation of harm in moral dilemmas.
Reynolds CJ; Conway P
Emotion; 2018 Oct; 18(7):1009-1023. PubMed ID: 29389202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A subjective utilitarian theory of moral judgment.
Cohen DJ; Ahn M
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Oct; 145(10):1359-1381. PubMed ID: 27513303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. More utilitarian judgment in Internet addiction? An exploration using process dissociation and the CNI model.
Lu J; Xie J; Chen J; Zeng Y; Jiang Z; Wang Y; Zheng H
Brain Behav; 2022 Mar; 12(3):e2510. PubMed ID: 35114077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
