These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35193425)

  • 1. Walk This Way: Ingroup Norms Determine Voting Intentions for Those Who Lack Sociopolitical Control.
    Potoczek A; Bukowski M; de Lemus S; Jiménez-Moya G; Rodríguez-López Á; Jasko K
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 May; 49(5):692-708. PubMed ID: 35193425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Government instability shifts skin tone representations of and intentions to vote for political candidates.
    Stern C; Balcetis E; Cole S; West TV; Caruso EM
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jan; 110(1):76-95. PubMed ID: 26727665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Infections and Elections: Did an Ebola Outbreak Influence the 2014 U.S. Federal Elections (and if so, How)?
    Beall AT; Hofer MK; Schaller M
    Psychol Sci; 2016 May; 27(5):595-605. PubMed ID: 26976083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Association between cigarette smoking status and voting intentions: Cross sectional surveys in England 2015-2020.
    Cox S; Brown J; McQuire C; de Vocht F; Beard E; West R; Shahab L
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):2254. PubMed ID: 34895194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A sociocultural approach to voting: Construing voting as a duty to others predicts political interest and engagement.
    Waldfogel HB; Dittmann AG; Birnbaum HJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2024 May; 121(22):e2215051121. PubMed ID: 38768346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-Target Implicit Association Tests (ST-IAT) Predict Voting Behavior of Decided and Undecided Voters in Swiss Referendums.
    Raccuia L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163872. PubMed ID: 27732617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unacquainted callers can predict which citizens will vote over and above citizens' stated self-predictions.
    Rogers T; Ten Brinke L; Carney DR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Jun; 113(23):6449-53. PubMed ID: 27217566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Moral Foundations and Voting Intention in Italy.
    Milesi P
    Eur J Psychol; 2017 Nov; 13(4):667-687. PubMed ID: 29358981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The political gender gap: gender bias in facial inferences that predict voting behavior.
    Chiao JY; Bowman NE; Gill H
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(10):e3666. PubMed ID: 18974841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.
    Patterson MM; Bigler RS; Pahlke E; Brown CS; Hayes AR; Ramirez MC; Nelson A
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2019 Sep; 84(3):7-185. PubMed ID: 31503346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Voting rights for psychiatric patients: compromise of the integrity of elections, or empowerment and integration into the community?
    Doron A; Kurs R; Stolovy T; Secker-Einbinder A; Raba A
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2014; 51(3):169-74. PubMed ID: 25618279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Voting Intention and Choices: Are Voters Always Rational and Deliberative?
    Lee IC; Chen EE; Tsai CH; Yen NS; Chen AL; Lin WC
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148643. PubMed ID: 26886266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cortisol and politics: variance in voting behavior is predicted by baseline cortisol levels.
    French JA; Smith KB; Alford JR; Guck A; Birnie AK; Hibbing JR
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Jun; 133():61-7. PubMed ID: 24835544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does Internet voting make elections less social? Group voting patterns in Estonian e-voting log files (2013-2015).
    Unt T; Solvak M; Vassil K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0177864. PubMed ID: 28542348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disability and voting.
    Matsubayashi T; Ueda M
    Disabil Health J; 2014 Jul; 7(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24947569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Latinx and Black young adults' pathways to civic/political engagement.
    Bañales J; Mathews C; Hayat N; Anyiwo N; Diemer MA
    Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol; 2020 Apr; 26(2):176-188. PubMed ID: 30816755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conformity to the descriptive norms of people with opposing political or social beliefs.
    Pryor C; Perfors A; Howe PDL
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(7):e0219464. PubMed ID: 31291343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. What inverted U can do for your country: A curvilinear relationship between confidence in the social system and political engagement.
    Cichocka A; Górska P; Jost JT; Sutton RM; Bilewicz M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2018 Nov; 115(5):883-902. PubMed ID: 28836802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Voting at 16: Turnout and the quality of vote choice.
    Wagner M; Johann D; Kritzinger S
    Elect Stud; 2012 Jun; 31(2):372-383. PubMed ID: 24850994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can low-cost, scalable, online interventions increase youth informed political participation in electoral authoritarian contexts?
    Ferrali R; Grossman G; Larreguy H
    Sci Adv; 2023 Jun; 9(26):eadf1222. PubMed ID: 37379394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.