These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35193474)

  • 1. Effect of adaptive beamforming and noise reduction algorithms on speech intelligibility and noise tolerance in bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Michels A; Oukheira Y; Brendel M; Aschendorff A; Arndt S; Wesarg T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2022 May; 23(3):148-157. PubMed ID: 35193474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.
    Mosnier I; Mathias N; Flament J; Amar D; Liagre-Callies A; Borel S; Ambert-Dahan E; Sterkers O; Bernardeschi D
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Sep; 274(9):3335-3342. PubMed ID: 28664331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Speech reception threshold benefits in cochlear implant users with an adaptive beamformer in real life situations.
    Geißler G; Arweiler I; Hehrmann P; Lenarz T; Hamacher V; Büchner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):69-76. PubMed ID: 24993633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monaural Beamforming in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users: Effect of (A)symmetric Directivity and Noise Type.
    Devocht EM; Janssen AM; Chalupper J; Stokroos RJ; George EL
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0160829. PubMed ID: 27537075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; Dingemanse JG; van Immerzeel T; van der Schroeff MP
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018; 23(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 29936510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech Intelligibility and Spatial Release From Masking Improvements Using Spatial Noise Reduction Algorithms in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Zedan A; Jürgens T; Williges B; Kollmeier B; Wiebe K; Galindo J; Wesarg T
    Trends Hear; 2021; 25():23312165211005931. PubMed ID: 33926327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Application of Noise Reduction Algorithm ClearVoice in Cochlear Implant Processing: Effects on Noise Tolerance and Speech Intelligibility in Noise in Relation to Spectral Resolution.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):357-67. PubMed ID: 25479412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimising the effect of noise reduction algorithm ClearVoice in cochlear implant users by increasing the maximum comfort levels.
    Dingemanse JG; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Mar; 57(3):230-235. PubMed ID: 29065731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of a moving noise masker on speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0126133. PubMed ID: 25970594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of Directional Microphones in Bilateral/Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users-Impact of Spatial and Temporal Noise Characteristics.
    Weissgerber T; Rader T; Baumann U
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Dec; 38(10):e551-e557. PubMed ID: 29135876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech understanding in background noise with the two-microphone adaptive beamformer BEAM in the Nucleus Freedom Cochlear Implant System.
    Spriet A; Van Deun L; Eftaxiadis K; Laneau J; Moonen M; van Dijk B; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 17204899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Benefit of directional microphones for unilateral, bilateral and bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Ernst A; Anton K; Brendel M; Battmer RD
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 May; 20(3):147-157. PubMed ID: 30760180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Homans NC; Goedegebure A; van der Schroeff MP
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Nov; 57(11):858-863. PubMed ID: 30261771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Beamforming and Single-Microphone Noise Reduction: Effects on Signal-to-Noise Ratio and Speech Recognition of Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC; Briaire J; Frijns J
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221112762. PubMed ID: 35862265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modelling speech reception thresholds and their improvements due to spatial noise reduction algorithms in bimodal cochlear implant users.
    Zedan A; Jürgens T; Williges B; Hülsmeier D; Kollmeier B
    Hear Res; 2022 Jul; 420():108507. PubMed ID: 35484022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fixed and adaptive beamforming improves speech perception in noise in cochlear implant recipients equipped with the MED-EL SONNET audio processor.
    Honeder C; Liepins R; Arnoldner C; Šinkovec H; Kaider A; Vyskocil E; Riss D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0190718. PubMed ID: 29304186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions.
    Buechner A; Dyballa KH; Hehrmann P; Fredelake S; Lenarz T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e95542. PubMed ID: 24755864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Residual Hearing Does Not Influence the Effectiveness of Beamforming when Using a Cochlear Implant in Conjunction with Contralateral Routing of Signals.
    Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2023; 28(4):262-271. PubMed ID: 36791686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Personalizing Transient Noise Reduction Algorithm Settings for Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC; Tops AL; Hehrmann P; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2021 Nov-Dec 01; 42(6):1602-1614. PubMed ID: 33974780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of Microphone Location and Beamforming Technology on Speech Recognition in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Holder JT; Taylor AL; Sunderhaus LW; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Jul; 31(7):506-512. PubMed ID: 32119817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.