These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35193474)

  • 21. Combining directional microphone and single-channel noise reduction algorithms: a clinical evaluation in difficult listening conditions with cochlear implant users.
    Hersbach AA; Arora K; Mauger SJ; Dawson PW
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e13-23. PubMed ID: 22555182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of a wireless remote microphone in bimodal cochlear implant recipients.
    Vroegop JL; Dingemanse JG; Homans NC; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Sep; 56(9):643-649. PubMed ID: 28395552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.
    Dwyer RT; Roberts J; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):578-589. PubMed ID: 32340055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of a transient noise reduction algorithm on speech intelligibility in noise, noise tolerance and perceived annoyance in cochlear implant users.
    Dingemanse JG; Vroegop JL; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(5):360-369. PubMed ID: 29334269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of speech reception threshold in noise in young Cochlear™ Nucleus
    Razza S; Zaccone M; Meli A; Cristofari E
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 103():71-75. PubMed ID: 29224769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A beamformer post-filter for cochlear implant noise reduction.
    Hersbach AA; Grayden DB; Fallon JB; McDermott HJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2412-20. PubMed ID: 23556606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binaural summation, binaural unmasking and fluctuating masker benefit in bimodal and bilateral adult cochlear implant users.
    de Graaff F; Eikelboom RH; Sucher C; Kramer SE; Smits C
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Sep; 22(5):245-256. PubMed ID: 33832408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Criteria for Selecting an Optimal Device for the Contralateral Ear of Children with a Unilateral Cochlear Implant.
    Jeong SW; Kang MY; Kim LS
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015; 20(5):314-21. PubMed ID: 26277845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Residual Hearing Affects Contralateral Routing of Signals in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Audiol Neurootol; 2022; 27(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 33849023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temporal Fine Structure Processing, Pitch, and Speech Perception in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Dincer D'Alessandro H; Ballantyne D; Boyle PJ; De Seta E; DeVincentiis M; Mancini P
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 29194080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Investigating Speech Recognition and listening effort with different device configurations in adult cochlear implant users.
    Sladen DP; Nie Y; Berg K
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 May; 19(3):119-130. PubMed ID: 29457564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech understanding and listening effort in cochlear implant users - microphone beamformers lead to significant improvements in noisy environments.
    Büchner A; Schwebs M; Lenarz T
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 Jan; 21(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31590612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Head shadow enhancement with low-frequency beamforming improves sound localization and speech perception for simulated bimodal listeners.
    Dieudonné B; Francart T
    Hear Res; 2018 Jun; 363():78-84. PubMed ID: 29555110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The efficacy of microphone directionality in improving speech recognition in noise for three commercial cochlear-implant systems.
    Sivonen V; Willberg T; Aarnisalo AA; Dietz A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2020 May; 21(3):153-159. PubMed ID: 32160829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Single Sided Deaf Cochlear Implant Users in the Difficult Listening Situation: Speech Perception and Subjective Benefit.
    Prejban DA; Hamzavi JS; Arnoldner C; Liepins R; Honeder C; Kaider A; Gstöttner W; Baumgartner WD; Riss D
    Otol Neurotol; 2018 Oct; 39(9):e803-e809. PubMed ID: 30199498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Matching Automatic Gain Control Across Devices in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Users.
    Veugen LC; Chalupper J; Snik AF; Opstal AJ; Mens LH
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):260-70. PubMed ID: 26656192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies II: Speech Intelligibility of Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users.
    Baumgärtel RM; Hu H; Krawczyk-Becker M; Marquardt D; Herzke T; Coleman G; Adiloğlu K; Bomke K; Plotz K; Gerkmann T; Doclo S; Kollmeier B; Hohmann V; Dietz M
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relation of hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measures with speech perception measures and acceptable noise levels in cochlear implant users.
    Dingemanse G; Goedegebure A
    Int J Audiol; 2020 Jun; 59(6):416-426. PubMed ID: 32091274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Benefits of Bimodal Aiding on Extended Dimensions of Speech Perception: Intelligibility, Listening Effort, and Sound Quality.
    Devocht EMJ; Janssen AML; Chalupper J; Stokroos RJ; George ELJ
    Trends Hear; 2017; 21():2331216517727900. PubMed ID: 28874096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.