These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35195022)

  • 1. Finite element analysis between Hunsuck/Epker and novel modification of Low Z plasty technique of mandibular sagittal split osteotomy.
    Dumrongwanich O; Chantarapanich N; Patchanee S; Inglam S; Chaiprakit N
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2022 May; 236(5):646-655. PubMed ID: 35195022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fracture patterns after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy of the mandibular ramus according to the Obwegeser/Dal Pont and Hunsuck/Epker modifications.
    Möhlhenrich SC; Kniha K; Peters F; Ayoub N; Goloborodko E; Hölzle F; Fritz U; Modabber A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 May; 45(5):762-767. PubMed ID: 28344028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the effect of mandibular length and height on the sagittal split ramus osteotomy rigid internal fixation techniques: A finite element analysis.
    Ergezen Ozasir E; Tosun E; Tuz HH
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Dec; 121(6):652-657. PubMed ID: 32068168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
    Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the lingual fracture patterns after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy according to Hunsuck/Epker modified by an additional inferior border osteotomy using a burr or ultrasonic device.
    Möhlhenrich SC; Ayoub N; Peters F; Winterhalder P; Prescher A; Hölzle F; Wolf M; Modabber A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 May; 48(5):620-628. PubMed ID: 30579742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Are There Differences in Fracture Patterns in Mandibular Ramus Sagittal Osteotomies Between Hunsuck/Epker, Wolford, and Posnick Modifications?
    Franco JMPL; Pita Neto IC; Pereira JMC; Silva PGB; Tofoli GR; Bezerra TP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Apr; 81(4):396-405. PubMed ID: 36681095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analysis of stress distribution on fixation of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy with resorbable plates and screws using the finite-element method.
    Sarkarat F; Motamedi MH; Bohluli B; Moharamnejad N; Ansari S; Shahabi-Sirjani H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jun; 70(6):1434-8. PubMed ID: 21820783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Bone Fixation in Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy Using Individual Models.
    Tamura N; Takaki T; Takano N; Shibahara T
    Bull Tokyo Dent Coll; 2018; 59(2):67-78. PubMed ID: 29962423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stability of bicortical screw versus plate fixation after mandibular setback with the bilateral sagittal split osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 26474933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of fixation method on intergonial width stability after mandibular setback via bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Jafarian M; Alam M; Shafiei S; Moslemi H; Tabrizi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2020 Nov; 49(11):1430-1434. PubMed ID: 32423690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Three-dimensional fracture pattern analysis of the Obwegeser and Dal Pont bilateral sagittal split osteotomy.
    Dreiseidler T; Bergmann J; Zirk M; Rothamel D; Zöller JE; Kreppel M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 45(11):1452-1458. PubMed ID: 27364368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative evaluation of stress distribution and transverse displacement of novel designs of miniplates for sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: a finite element analysis.
    Anlar H; Hasanoglu Erbasar GN; Konarılı FN; Orhan M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Nov; 60(9):1266-1272. PubMed ID: 36055864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Transverse Displacement of the Proximal Segment After Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy With Different Lingual Split Patterns and Advancement Amounts Using the Finite Element Method.
    Dai Z; Hou M; Ma W; Song DL; Zhang CX; Zhou WY
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 74(11):2286.e1-2286.e11. PubMed ID: 27542550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of mandibular setback after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with the hunsuck modification and miniplate fixation.
    Yang XW; Long X; Yeweng SJ; Kao CT
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Nov; 65(11):2176-80. PubMed ID: 17954311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of the closing and opening muscle groups of jaw condyle biomechanics after mandible bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    Xiangdong QI; Limin MA; Shizhen Z
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 40(6):e159-64. PubMed ID: 21907586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low to high oblique ramus piezoosteotomy: a pilot study.
    Landes C; Tran A; Ballon A; Santo G; Schübel F; Sader R
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):901-9. PubMed ID: 24503387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is There a Difference in Stability or Neurosensory Function Between Bilateral Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy and Intraoral Vertical Ramus Osteotomy for Mandibular Setback?
    Al-Moraissi EA; Ellis E
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jul; 73(7):1360-71. PubMed ID: 25871900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion.
    Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
    Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the type of sagittal split ramus osteotomy influence fixation strength? Evaluation of the mechanical behavior of two types of fixation used in three types of sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
    da Silva Oliveira S; de Carvalho PHM; Sverzut CE; Trivellato AE
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):633-639. PubMed ID: 35022847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.