These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35195454)

  • 1. Impact of preoperative staging with contrast-enhanced mammography for localized breast cancer management.
    Montrognon F; Clatot F; Berghian A; Douvrin F; Quieffin F; Defta D; Buquet A; Ferret M; Lequesne J; Leheurteur M; Fontanilles M; Georgescu D; Callonnec F
    Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20210765. PubMed ID: 35195454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: Large-scale single-center experience.
    Bicchierai G; Tonelli P; Piacenti A; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Kaur Gill M; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 31999029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM).
    Amato F; Bicchierai G; Cirone D; Depretto C; Di Naro F; Vanzi E; Scaperrotta G; Bartolotta TV; Miele V; Nori J
    Radiol Med; 2019 Dec; 124(12):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 31773458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer.
    Ali-Mucheru M; Pockaj B; Patel B; Pizzitola V; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Gray R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Value Added of Preoperative Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in Patients With Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast.
    Patel BK; Davis J; Ferraro C; Kosiorek H; Hasselbach K; Ocal T; Pockaj B
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Dec; 18(6):e1339-e1345. PubMed ID: 30122347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which clinical, radiological, histological, and molecular parameters are associated with the absence of enhancement of known breast cancers with Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM)?
    Bicchierai G; Amato F; Vanzi B; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Di Naro F; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Cozzi D; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast; 2020 Dec; 54():15-24. PubMed ID: 32889303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Added value of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in staging of malignant breast lesions-a feasibility study.
    Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Rasmussen R; Behmer C; Zackrisson S; Ryden L
    World J Surg Oncol; 2020 May; 18(1):100. PubMed ID: 32438917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
    Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
    Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing tumor extent on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus full-field digital mammography and ultrasound.
    Patel BK; Garza SA; Eversman S; Lopez-Alvarez Y; Kosiorek H; Pockaj BA
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():78-84. PubMed ID: 28750354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Screening for Intermediate-Risk Women With a History of Lobular Neoplasia.
    Hogan MP; Amir T; Sevilimedu V; Sung J; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1486-1491. PubMed ID: 33787291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of background parenchymal enhancement levels on the diagnosis of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in evaluations of breast cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Yuen S; Monzawa S; Gose A; Yanai S; Yata Y; Matsumoto H; Ichinose Y; Tashiro T; Yamagami K
    Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 29(4):677-687. PubMed ID: 35220511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography: Technique, Clinical Applications, and Pitfalls.
    Polat DS; Evans WP; Dogan BE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Nov; 215(5):1267-1278. PubMed ID: 32877247
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions.
    Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abrams GS; Ganott MA; Gizienski TA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Waheed U; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):969-976. PubMed ID: 31495761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Single Center Evaluation of Comparative Breast Radiation dose of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM), Digital Mammography (DM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).
    Bicchierai G; Busoni S; Tortoli P; Bettarini S; Naro FD; De Benedetto D; Savi E; Bellini C; Miele V; Nori J
    Acad Radiol; 2022 Sep; 29(9):1342-1349. PubMed ID: 35065889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography versus Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Preoperative Evaluation of Breast Cancer.
    Kim EY; Youn I; Lee KH; Yun JS; Park YL; Park CH; Moon J; Choi SH; Choi YJ; Ham SY; Kook SH
    J Breast Cancer; 2018 Dec; 21(4):453-462. PubMed ID: 30607168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast enhanced digital mammography versus magnetic resonance imaging for accurate measurement of the size of breast cancer.
    Youn I; Choi S; Choi YJ; Moon JH; Park HJ; Ham SY; Park CH; Kim EY; Kook SH
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Jun; 92(1098):20180929. PubMed ID: 31017460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scintimammography with high resolution dedicated breast camera and mammography in multifocal, multicentric and bilateral breast cancer detection: a comparative study.
    Spanu A; Chessa F; Battista Meloni G; Sanna D; Cottu P; Manca A; Nuvoli S; Madeddu G
    Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2009 Apr; 53(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 18432183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.