These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35195570)

  • 1. Preoperative Imaging of Temporoparietal Scalp Thickness Predicts Off-the-Ear Sound Processor Retention in Cochlear Implants With Diametric Magnets.
    Adkins WJ; Henrie T; Nassiri AM; Neff BA; Carlson ML; Driscoll CLW; Saoji AA
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Apr; 43(4):e421-e426. PubMed ID: 35195570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal Retention Force of Audio Processor Magnets.
    Wagner L; Hönig E; Fröhlich L; Plontke S; Rahne T
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jun; 40(5):e482-e487. PubMed ID: 31083075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is Early Cochlear Implant Device Activation Safe for All on-the-Ear and off-the-Ear Sound Processors?
    Batuk MO; Yarali M; Cinar BC; Kocabay AP; Bajin MD; Sennaroglu G; Sennaroglu L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):279-284. PubMed ID: 31665723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Selection of speech processor in cochlear implant patients: experience in a tertiary hospital.
    Park SM; Chun Y; Choi BY
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2024 Feb; 144(2):91-95. PubMed ID: 38469743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Triamcinolone Injection for Cochlear Implant Magnet Adherence Issues.
    Tawk K; Goshtasbi K; Frank M; Martin EC; Abouzari M; Djalilian HR
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Sep; 44(8):e572-e576. PubMed ID: 37550870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hearing performance in single-sided deaf cochlear implant users after upgrade to a single-unit speech processor.
    Mertens G; Hofkens A; Punte AK; De Bodt M; Van de Heyning P
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan; 36(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 25406874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of Cochlear Implant With Diametric Magnet on Imaging Access, Safety, and Clinical Care.
    Young NM; Hoff SR; Ryan M
    Laryngoscope; 2021 Mar; 131(3):E952-E956. PubMed ID: 32569426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of behind-the-ear and off-the-ear sound processors on speech understanding performance in cochlear implant users.
    Bayri M; Çiprut A
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2020 Dec; 47(6):950-957. PubMed ID: 32591169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of Microphone Configuration and Sound Source Location on Speech Recognition for Adult Cochlear Implant Users with Current-Generation Sound Processors.
    Dwyer RT; Roberts J; Gifford RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Sep; 31(8):578-589. PubMed ID: 32340055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Speech Recognition in Cochlear Implant Users with Different Speech Processors.
    Pinheiro MMC; Mancini PC; Soares AD; Ribas Â; Lima DP; Cavadas M; Banhara MR; Carvalho SADS; Buzo BC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Jul; 32(7):469-476. PubMed ID: 34847587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Temporal Scalp Thickness, Body Mass Index, and Suprafascial Placement of Receiver Coil of the Cochlear Implant.
    Ozturan O; Yenigun A; Senturk E; Calim OF; Aksoy F; Eren SB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 28(8):e781-e785. PubMed ID: 28938330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding Patient Utilization Patterns of Cochlear Implant Processors.
    Babajanian EE; Cervantes MM; Gordon SA; Johnson KM; Horn ML; Patel NS; Gurgel RK
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2024 May; 133(5):532-537. PubMed ID: 38384240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical outcomes with the Kanso™ off-the-ear cochlear implant sound processor.
    Mauger SJ; Jones M; Nel E; Del Dot J
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Apr; 56(4):267-276. PubMed ID: 28067077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Skin flap thickness and magnet strength in Cochlear implants.
    Searle T; Marshall E; Craddock L; Monksfield P
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 Mar; 22(2):80-84. PubMed ID: 32993474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Benefit of a commercially available cochlear implant processor with dual-microphone beamforming: a multi-center study.
    Wolfe J; Parkinson A; Schafer EC; Gilden J; Rehwinkel K; Mansanares J; Coughlan E; Wright J; Torres J; Gannaway S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jun; 33(4):553-60. PubMed ID: 22588233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Off the ear with no loss in speech understanding: comparing the RONDO and the OPUS 2 cochlear implant audio processors.
    Dazert S; Thomas JP; Büchner A; Müller J; Hempel JM; Löwenheim H; Mlynski R
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 274(3):1391-1395. PubMed ID: 27909888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients with Cochlear Implants without Magnet Removal: A Radiology-Administered Protocol to Enhance Operational Efficiency and Improve Workflow.
    Johnson BJ; Macielak RJ; Watson RE; Heimer JM; Wiste BJ; Lane JI; Edmonson HA; Carlson ML
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Aug; 44(7):664-671. PubMed ID: 37278159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects.
    Kludt E; D'hondt C; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jun; 38(5):655-661. PubMed ID: 28406848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Cochlear Implant Magnet in Place: Safety and Imaging Quality.
    Carlson ML; Neff BA; Link MJ; Lane JI; Watson RE; McGee KP; Bernstein MA; Driscoll CL
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jul; 36(6):965-71. PubMed ID: 25931165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A Review of Reported Adverse Events in MRI-Safe and MRI-Conditional Cochlear Implants.
    Bestourous DE; Davidson L; Reilly BK
    Otol Neurotol; 2022 Jan; 43(1):42-47. PubMed ID: 34510115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.