180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35196835)
1. Short-Term Clinical Results of Preferred Retinal Locus Training.
Bozkurt Oflaz A; Turgut Öztürk B; Gönül Ş; Bakbak B; Gedik Ş; Okudan S
Turk J Ophthalmol; 2022 Feb; 52(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 35196835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effectiveness of Low Vision Rehabilitation Using Microperimetric Acoustic Biofeedback Training in Patients with Central Scotoma.
Sahli E; Altinbay D; Bingol Kiziltunc P; Idil A
Curr Eye Res; 2021 May; 46(5):731-738. PubMed ID: 33073619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of MP-3 microperimeter biofeedback fixation training for low vision rehabilitation in patients with maculopathy.
Qian T; Xu X; Liu X; Yen M; Zhou H; Mao M; Cai H; Shen H; Xu X; Gong Y; Yu S
BMC Ophthalmol; 2022 Apr; 22(1):197. PubMed ID: 35484529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual rehabilitation via microperimetry in patients with geographic atrophy: a pilot study.
Ramírez Estudillo JA; León Higuera MI; Rojas Juárez S; Ordaz Vera ML; Pablo Santana Y; Celis Suazo B
Int J Retina Vitreous; 2017; 3():21. PubMed ID: 28536656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Visual rehabilitation using microperimetric acoustic biofeedback training in individuals with central scotoma.
Ratra D; Gopalakrishnan S; Dalan D; Ratra V; Damkondwar D; Laxmi G
Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30253443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Normal values for microperimetry with the MAIA microperimeter: sensitivity and fixation analysis in healthy adults and children.
Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 27(5):607-613. PubMed ID: 28127734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New trends in visual rehabilitation with MP-1 microperimeter biofeedback: optic neural dysfunction.
Verboschi F; Domanico D; Nebbioso M; Corradetti G; Zaccaria Scalinci S; Vingolo EM
Funct Neurol; 2013; 28(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24598397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microperimetric Biofeedback Training Improved Visual Acuity after Successful Macular Hole Surgery.
Ueda-Consolvo T; Otsuka M; Hayashi Y; Ishida M; Hayashi A
J Ophthalmol; 2015; 2015():572942. PubMed ID: 26783452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eccentric fixation patterns, clinical findings, and reading speed in patients with bilateral toxoplasmic macular retinochoroiditis.
Antunes-Foschini RMS; Ho W; Messias A
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2018; 81(5):401-407. PubMed ID: 30208142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. How Much Do Clinical and Microperimetric Findings Affect Reading Speed in Low Vision Patients with Age-related Macular Degeneration?
Altinbay D; Idil A; Sahli E
Curr Eye Res; 2021 Oct; 46(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 33632033
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness of visual and acoustic biofeedback eccentric viewing training in conjunction with home exercises on visual function: a retrospective observational review.
Kelly N; Vukicevic M; Koklanis K
Strabismus; 2023 Mar; 31(1):55-65. PubMed ID: 36908278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biofeedback rehabilitation of eccentric fixation in patients with Stargardt disease.
Verdina T; Giacomelli G; Sodi A; Pennino M; Paggini C; Murro V; Virgili G; Menchini U
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2013; 23(5):723-31. PubMed ID: 23640508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and Intersession Agreement of Microperimetric and Fixation Measurements Obtained with a New Microperimeter in Normal Eyes.
Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
Curr Eye Res; 2016; 41(3):400-9. PubMed ID: 25859613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biofeedback Low Vision Rehabilitation with Retimax Vision Trainer in Patients with Advanced Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Pilot Study.
Verdina T; Piaggi S; Peschiera R; Russolillo V; Ferraro V; Chester J; Mastropasqua R; Cavallini GM
Semin Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 35(3):164-169. PubMed ID: 32476579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biofeedback fixation training method for improving eccentric vision in patients with loss of foveal function secondary to different maculopathies.
Morales MU; Saker S; Wilde C; Rubinstein M; Limoli P; Amoaku WM
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Feb; 40(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 31583549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biofeedback stimulation in patients with age-related macular degeneration: comparison between 2 different methods.
Amore FM; Paliotta S; Silvestri V; Piscopo P; Turco S; Reibaldi A
Can J Ophthalmol; 2013 Oct; 48(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 24093192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of fixation characteristics in amblyopia using microperimetry.
Altinbay D; Sahli E; Bingol Kiziltunc P; Atilla H
Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Sep; 43(9):3403-3412. PubMed ID: 37184805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss.
Tarita-Nistor L; González EG; Markowitz SN; Steinbach MJ
Vis Neurosci; 2009 Nov; 26(5-6):487-94. PubMed ID: 20003597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Retinal Sensitivity and Fixation Analysis Using Microperimetry in Children With Anisometropic Amblyopia.
Dikkaya F; Karaman Erdur S
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2020 Jul; 57(4):246-250. PubMed ID: 32687209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fixation pattern analysis with microperimetry in nystagmus patients.
Molina-Martín A; Piñero DP; Pérez-Cambrodí RJ
Can J Ophthalmol; 2015 Dec; 50(6):413-21. PubMed ID: 26651299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
