These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3519725)

  • 1. A visible light-cured posterior composite resin: results of a 3-year clinical evaluation.
    Boksman L; Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Charles DH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1986 May; 112(5):627-31. PubMed ID: 3519725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized controlled 27 years follow up of three resin composites in Class II restorations.
    Pallesen U; van Dijken JW
    J Dent; 2015 Dec; 43(12):1547-58. PubMed ID: 26363442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct posterior composite resin restorations: a review. 2. Clinical technique.
    Bryant RW
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Jun; 37(3):161-71. PubMed ID: 1627065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of treatment times for Class II composite resin restorations.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ; van't Hof MA
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1991; 58(5):372-7. PubMed ID: 1939801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of six composite resins in posterior teeth.
    Tyas MJ; Truong VT; Goldman M; Beech DR
    Aust Dent J; 1989 Apr; 34(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 2730429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using composite resin as a posterior restorative material.
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1991 Apr; 122(4):65-70. PubMed ID: 2022790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations.
    Morgan M
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2004 Apr; 16(3):211-7; quiz 218. PubMed ID: 15199696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
    Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of light-cured and auto-cured composite resin restorations.
    Richardson AS; Derkson GD
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1987 Sep; 53(9):681-3. PubMed ID: 3308029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of treatment times for Class II resin composite inlays.
    Kreulen CM; van Amerongen WE; Gruythuysen RJ; Akerboom HB; Borgmeijer PJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1992; 59(5):333-7. PubMed ID: 1401403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation.
    de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Five-year clinical study of u.v.-polymerized posterior composites.
    Wilder AD; Bayne SC; May KN; Leinfelder KF; Taylor DF
    J Dent; 1991 Aug; 19(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1787209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical performance of Class II restorations in which resin composite is laminated over resin-modified glass-ionomer.
    Aboush YE; Torabzadeh H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 11203844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A 5-year study comparing a posterior composite resin and an amalgam.
    Norman RD; Wright JS; Rydberg RJ; Felkner LL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Nov; 64(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 2090809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical performance of posterior composite resin restorations.
    Johnson GH; Bales DJ; Gordon GE; Powell LV
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Oct; 23(10):705-11. PubMed ID: 1289954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Class II glass ionomer cermet tunnel, resin sandwich and amalgam restorations over 2 years.
    Wilkie R; Lidums A; Smales R
    Am J Dent; 1993 Aug; 6(4):181-4. PubMed ID: 7803004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.