These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3519890)

  • 1. Three-dimensional measurement of stone cast deformation. Part 2. Effects of types of impression material and mold on the dimensional stability of stone casts.
    Habu H; Kobayashi K
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1986 Mar; 28(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 3519890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional changes and pressure of dental stones set in silicone rubber impressions.
    Teraoka F; Takahashi J
    Dent Mater; 2000 Mar; 16(2):145-9. PubMed ID: 11203536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of stone-casts produced from selected addition-type silicone impressions.
    Finger W; Ohsawa M
    Scand J Dent Res; 1983 Feb; 91(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 6573762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Surfaces of stone models made in elastic material impression. II. Stone model surfaces set against synthetic rubber impressions].
    Daito K
    Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1972 Dec; 39(4):597-610. PubMed ID: 4513389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Production of test blocks duplicated by electroforming for detail reproduction of impressions made with impression materials.
    Nishiyama M; Kaketani M; Matsudaira S; Ohashi M
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1984 Sep; 26(3):211-37. PubMed ID: 6394724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between critical convergence angle and surface defects in stone casts.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Quintessence Int; 1990 Aug; 21(8):675-9. PubMed ID: 2094872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting the accuracy of elastometric impression materials.
    Chen SY; Liang WM; Chen FN
    J Dent; 2004 Nov; 32(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 15476954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of complete dental arch impressions and stone casts using a three-dimensional measurement system. Effects on accuracy of rubber impression materials and trays.
    Ishida K
    Dent Jpn (Tokyo); 1990; 27(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 2099294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wettability of elastomeric impression materials and voids in gypsum casts.
    Cullen DR; Mikesell JW; Sandrik JL
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Aug; 66(2):261-5. PubMed ID: 1774689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does 6 Hours of Contact With Alginate Impression Material Affect Dental Cast Properties?
    Ibrahim AA; Alhajj MN; Khalifa N; Gilada MW
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2017 Jun; 38(6):e1-e4. PubMed ID: 28586232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distortion analysis of stone casts made from impression materials.
    Linke BA; Nicholls JI; Faucher RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Dec; 54(6):794-802. PubMed ID: 3908660
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness of dental stone casts from alginate impressions.
    Keuter FM; Davidson CL
    J Dent; 1986 Feb; 14(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 3546427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Behavior of impression and model materials (Verification of linear dimensional alterations)].
    Lombardo JG; de Paula e Silva R; Mendes AJ
    Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1978; 32(2):110-4. PubMed ID: 283454
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the methods for dislodging the impression tray affecting the dimensional accuracy of the abutments in a complete dental arch cast.
    Shigeto N; Murata H; Hamada T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1989 Jan; 61(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 2644422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Surfaces of stone models made by the laminated single impression technique with silicone materials (author's transl)].
    Daito K; Miyauchi H; Okuno T; Mitani S; Takatsu T
    Nihon Shika Zairyo Kikai Gakkai Zasshi; 1974 Jun; 31(2):27-31. PubMed ID: 4620680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface reproducibility of resin die materials with various impression materials.
    Kozono Y; Kakigawa H; Tajima K; Hayashi I
    Dent Mater J; 1983 Dec; 2(2):169-78. PubMed ID: 6586349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.