These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35199137)

  • 1. TRScore: a 3D RepVGG-based scoring method for ranking protein docking models.
    Guo L; He J; Lin P; Huang SY; Wang J
    Bioinformatics; 2022 Apr; 38(9):2444-2451. PubMed ID: 35199137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. ViTScore: A Novel Three-Dimensional Vision Transformer Method for Accurate Prediction of Protein-Ligand Docking Poses.
    Guo L; Qiu T; Wang J
    IEEE Trans Nanobioscience; 2023 Oct; 22(4):734-743. PubMed ID: 37159314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. GSScore: a novel Graphormer-based shell-like scoring method for protein-ligand docking.
    Guo L; Wang J
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38706316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. iScore: a novel graph kernel-based function for scoring protein-protein docking models.
    Geng C; Jung Y; Renaud N; Honavar V; Bonvin AMJJ; Xue LC
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Jan; 36(1):112-121. PubMed ID: 31199455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dockground scoring benchmarks for protein docking.
    Kotthoff I; Kundrotas PJ; Vakser IA
    Proteins; 2022 Jun; 90(6):1259-1266. PubMed ID: 35072956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Energy-based graph convolutional networks for scoring protein docking models.
    Cao Y; Shen Y
    Proteins; 2020 Aug; 88(8):1091-1099. PubMed ID: 32144844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Refinement of pairwise potentials via logistic regression to score protein-protein interactions.
    Tanemura KA; Pei J; Merz KM
    Proteins; 2020 Dec; 88(12):1559-1568. PubMed ID: 32729132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Consensus scoring for enriching near-native structures from protein-protein docking decoys.
    Liang S; Meroueh SO; Wang G; Qiu C; Zhou Y
    Proteins; 2009 May; 75(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 18831053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ranking multiple docking solutions based on the conservation of inter-residue contacts.
    Oliva R; Vangone A; Cavallo L
    Proteins; 2013 Sep; 81(9):1571-84. PubMed ID: 23609916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protein docking model evaluation by 3D deep convolutional neural networks.
    Wang X; Terashi G; Christoffer CW; Zhu M; Kihara D
    Bioinformatics; 2020 Apr; 36(7):2113-2118. PubMed ID: 31746961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DOCKGROUND protein-protein docking decoy set.
    Liu S; Gao Y; Vakser IA
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Nov; 24(22):2634-5. PubMed ID: 18812365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
    Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
    J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CLUB-MARTINI: Selecting Favourable Interactions amongst Available Candidates, a Coarse-Grained Simulation Approach to Scoring Docking Decoys.
    Hou Q; Lensink MF; Heringa J; Feenstra KA
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0155251. PubMed ID: 27166787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Protein Docking Model Evaluation by Graph Neural Networks.
    Wang X; Flannery ST; Kihara D
    Front Mol Biosci; 2021; 8():647915. PubMed ID: 34113650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. MetaScore: A Novel Machine-Learning-Based Approach to Improve Traditional Scoring Functions for Scoring Protein-Protein Docking Conformations.
    Jung Y; Geng C; Bonvin AMJJ; Xue LC; Honavar VG
    Biomolecules; 2023 Jan; 13(1):. PubMed ID: 36671507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Score_set: a CAPRI benchmark for scoring protein complexes.
    Lensink MF; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2014 Nov; 82(11):3163-9. PubMed ID: 25179222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Target-specific native/decoy pose classifier improves the accuracy of ligand ranking in the CSAR 2013 benchmark.
    Fourches D; Politi R; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jan; 55(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 25521713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. GDockScore: a graph-based protein-protein docking scoring function.
    McFee M; Kim PM
    Bioinform Adv; 2023; 3(1):vbad072. PubMed ID: 37359726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A systematic analysis of scoring functions in rigid-body protein docking: The delicate balance between the predictive rate improvement and the risk of overtraining.
    Barradas-Bautista D; Moal IH; Fernández-Recio J
    Proteins; 2017 Jul; 85(7):1287-1297. PubMed ID: 28342242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sampling and scoring: a marriage made in heaven.
    Vajda S; Hall DR; Kozakov D
    Proteins; 2013 Nov; 81(11):1874-84. PubMed ID: 23775627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.