These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35199279)

  • 1. Impact of rubidium imaging availability on management of patients with acute chest pain.
    Shaukat Ali A; Finnerty V; Harel F; Marquis-Gravel G; Vadeboncoeur A; Pelletier-Galarneau M
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):3281-3290. PubMed ID: 35199279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Myocardial perfusion in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: comparison between 320-MDCT and rubidium-82 PET.
    Dantas RN; Assuncao AN; Marques IA; Fahel MG; Nomura CH; Avila LFR; Giorgi MCP; Soares J; Meneghetti JC; Parga JR
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jun; 28(6):2665-2674. PubMed ID: 29352381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Randomized Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness of Pharmacologic SPECT and PET MPI in Symptomatic CAD Patients.
    Patel KK; Al Badarin F; Chan PS; Spertus JA; Courter S; Kennedy KF; Case JA; McGhie AI; Heller GV; Bateman TM
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Sep; 12(9):1821-1831. PubMed ID: 31326480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Phase II safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography.
    Berman DS; Maddahi J; Tamarappoo BK; Czernin J; Taillefer R; Udelson JE; Gibson CM; Devine M; Lazewatsky J; Bhat G; Washburn D
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 61(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 23265345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The feasibility of Rubidium-82 positron emission tomography stress testing in low-risk chest pain protocol patients.
    Osborne AD; Moore B; Ross MA; Pitts SR
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2011 Mar; 10(1):41-3. PubMed ID: 21562374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics and key differences between patient populations receiving imaging modalities for coronary artery disease diagnosis in the US.
    Pelletier-Galarneau M; Vandenbroucke E; Lu M; Li O
    BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2023 May; 23(1):251. PubMed ID: 37189049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. ⁸²Rb PET myocardial perfusion imaging is superior to ⁹⁹mTc-labelled agent SPECT in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
    Flotats A; Bravo PE; Fukushima K; Chaudhry MA; Merrill J; Bengel FM
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2012 Aug; 39(8):1233-9. PubMed ID: 22648514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combined stress myocardial CT perfusion and coronary CT angiography as a feasible strategy among patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department.
    Grandhi GR; Batlle JC; Maroules CD; Janowitz W; Peña CS; Ziffer JA; Macedo R; Nasir K; Cury RC
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 32807703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rest-Only Myocardial CT Perfusion in Acute Chest Pain.
    Thomas DM; Larson CW; Cheezum MK; Villines TC; Branch KR; Blankstein R; Cury RC; Slim AM
    South Med J; 2015 Nov; 108(11):688-94. PubMed ID: 26539951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Diagnostic Accuracy of Noninvasive 64-row Computed Tomographic Coronary Angiography (CCTA) Compared with Myocardial Perfusion Imaging (MPI): The PICTURE Study, A Prospective Multicenter Trial.
    Budoff MJ; Li D; Kazerooni EA; Thomas GS; Mieres JH; Shaw LJ
    Acad Radiol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):22-29. PubMed ID: 27771227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does quantification of myocardial flow reserve using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography facilitate detection of multivessel coronary artery disease?
    Ziadi MC; Dekemp RA; Williams K; Guo A; Renaud JM; Chow BJ; Klein R; Ruddy TD; Aung M; Garrard L; Beanlands RS
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Aug; 19(4):670-80. PubMed ID: 22415819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of myocardial perfusion imaging with PET and (82)Rb on downstream invasive procedure utilization, costs, and outcomes in coronary disease management.
    Merhige ME; Breen WJ; Shelton V; Houston T; D'Arcy BJ; Perna AF
    J Nucl Med; 2007 Jul; 48(7):1069-76. PubMed ID: 17607038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography?
    Yoshinaga K; Chow BJ; Williams K; Chen L; deKemp RA; Garrard L; Lok-Tin Szeto A; Aung M; Davies RA; Ruddy TD; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Sep; 48(5):1029-39. PubMed ID: 16949498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Gated-SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging and coronary calcium score for evaluation of patients with acute chest pain and a normal or nondiagnostic electrocardiogram.
    Peix A; Batista E; Cabrera LO; Rodríguez L; Padrón K; Saínz B; Mendoza V; Carrillo R; Fernández Y; Mena E; Dondi M
    Coron Artery Dis; 2012 Nov; 23(7):438-44. PubMed ID: 22868413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of cardiac hybrid ¹⁵O-water PET/CT imaging on downstream referral for invasive coronary angiography and revascularization rate.
    Danad I; Raijmakers PG; Harms HJ; van Kuijk C; van Royen N; Diamant M; Lammertsma AA; Lubberink M; van Rossum AC; Knaapen P
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Feb; 15(2):170-9. PubMed ID: 23839653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of coronary CTA and stress testing using high-efficiency SPECT MPI for the evaluation of chest pain in the emergency department.
    Duvall WL; Savino JA; Levine EJ; Baber U; Lin JT; Einstein AJ; Hermann LK; Henzlova MJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2014 Apr; 21(2):305-18. PubMed ID: 24310280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semi-quantitative assessment of ischemia with rubidium-82 PET myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Borren NM; Gerritse TJ; Ottervanger JP; Mouden M; Timmer JR; van Dalen JA; Jager PL; van Dijk JD
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Dec; 29(6):3155-3162. PubMed ID: 34970710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Implementation of a cardiac PET stress program: comparison of outcomes to the preceding SPECT era.
    Knight S; Min DB; Le VT; Meredith KG; Dhar R; Biswas S; Jensen KR; Mason SM; Ethington JD; Lappe DL; Muhlestein JB; Anderson JL; Knowlton KU
    JCI Insight; 2018 May; 3(9):. PubMed ID: 29720565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fused cardiac hybrid imaging with coronary computed tomography angiography and positron emission tomography in patients with complex coronary artery anomalies.
    Gräni C; Benz DC; Possner M; Clerc OF; Mikulicic F; Vontobel J; Stehli J; Fuchs TA; Pazhenkottil AP; Gaemperli O; Kaufmann PA; Buechel RR
    Congenit Heart Dis; 2017 Jan; 12(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 27539240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD.
    Alam L; Omar AMS; Patel KK
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 25(4):281-293. PubMed ID: 36826689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.