These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35199279)

  • 21. Improved Performance of PET Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Compared to SPECT in the Evaluation of Suspected CAD.
    Alam L; Omar AMS; Patel KK
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2023 Apr; 25(4):281-293. PubMed ID: 36826689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reasons for discordance between positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) results and subsequent management.
    Thomas M; Spertus JA; Kennedy KF; Thompson RC; Chan PS; Bateman TM; Patel KK
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Jun; 29(3):1109-1116. PubMed ID: 34169476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Economic and healthcare resource utilization assessments of PET imaging in Coronary Artery Disease diagnosis: a systematic review and discussion of opportunities for future economic evaluations.
    Ferko N; Priest S; Almuallem L; Walczyk Mooradally A; Wang D; Oliva Ramirez A; Szabo E; Cabra A
    J Med Econ; 2024; 27(1):715-729. PubMed ID: 38650543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
    Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Head-to-head comparison of the diagnostic performances of Rubidium-PET and SPECT with CZT camera for the detection of myocardial ischemia in a population of women and overweight individuals.
    Hyafil F; Chequer R; Sorbets E; Estellat C; Ducrocq G; Rouzet F; Alfaiate T; Regaieg H; Abtan J; Leygnac S; Milliner M; Imbert L; Burg S; Ben Azzouna R; Potier L; Laouénan C; Quintin C; Roussel R; Hartemann A; Montalescot G; Marie PY; Steg G; Le Guludec D
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Jun; 27(3):755-768. PubMed ID: 30574676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Semi-quantitative myocardial perfusion measured by computed tomography in patients with refractory angina: a head-to-head comparison with quantitative rubidium-82 positron emission tomography as reference.
    Qayyum AA; Kühl JT; Kjaer A; Hasbak P; Kofoed KF; Kastrup J
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2017 Sep; 37(5):481-488. PubMed ID: 26625937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Incremental diagnostic benefit of resolution recovery software in patients with equivocal myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT).
    Qutub MA; Dowsley T; Ali I; Wells RG; Chen L; Ruddy TD; Chow BJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2013 Aug; 20(4):545-52. PubMed ID: 23709280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical impact of quantitative [
    Promteangtrong C; Jantarato A; Kunawudhi A; Kiatkittikul P; Siripongsatian D; Boonkawin N; Chotipanich C
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1887-1899. PubMed ID: 33826128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost.
    Lee SP; Seo JK; Hwang IC; Park JB; Park EA; Lee W; Paeng JC; Lee HJ; Yoon YE; Kim HL; Koh E; Choi I; Choi JE; Kim YJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 20(4):417-425. PubMed ID: 30052964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Added value of coronary artery calcium score in the reporting of SPECT versus PET myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Mouden M; Jager PL; van Dalen JA; van Dijk JD
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Oct; 29(5):2448-2456. PubMed ID: 34476779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography-Acquired Myocardial Perfusion Imaging for the Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Arbab-Zadeh A; Di Carli MF; Cerci R; George RT; Chen MY; Dewey M; Niinuma H; Vavere AL; Betoko A; Plotkin M; Cox C; Clouse ME; Arai AE; Rochitte CE; Lima JA; Brinker J; Miller JM
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 8(10):e003533. PubMed ID: 26467105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients presenting with syncope: Comparison of PET vs. SPECT.
    Thomas M; Patel KK; Peri-Okonny P; Sperry BW; McGhie AI; Badarin FA; Saeed IM; Kennedy KF; Chan P; Spertus JA; Thompson RC; Bateman TM
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2021 Dec; 28(6):2895-2906. PubMed ID: 32405986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Does rubidium-82 PET have superior accuracy to SPECT perfusion imaging for the diagnosis of obstructive coronary disease?: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Mc Ardle BA; Dowsley TF; deKemp RA; Wells GA; Beanlands RS
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 Oct; 60(18):1828-37. PubMed ID: 23040573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stomach interference in
    Rasmussen T; Kjær A; Hasbak P
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2019 Dec; 26(6):1934-1942. PubMed ID: 29968157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Automated quantitative Rb-82 3D PET/CT myocardial perfusion imaging: normal limits and correlation with invasive coronary angiography.
    Nakazato R; Berman DS; Dey D; Le Meunier L; Hayes SW; Fermin JS; Cheng VY; Thomson LE; Friedman JD; Germano G; Slomka PJ
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2012 Apr; 19(2):265-76. PubMed ID: 22203445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic accuracy of rubidium-82 myocardial perfusion imaging with hybrid positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease.
    Sampson UK; Dorbala S; Limaye A; Kwong R; Di Carli MF
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2007 Mar; 49(10):1052-8. PubMed ID: 17349884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Predictors of high-risk coronary artery disease in subjects with normal SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.
    Nakanishi R; Gransar H; Slomka P; Arsanjani R; Shalev A; Otaki Y; Friedman JD; Hayes SW; Thomson LE; Fish M; Germano G; Abidov A; Shaw L; Rozanski A; Berman DS
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2016 Jun; 23(3):530-41. PubMed ID: 25971987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Diagnosis and Prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease with SPECT and PET.
    Al Badarin FJ; Malhotra S
    Curr Cardiol Rep; 2019 May; 21(7):57. PubMed ID: 31104158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Phase-III Clinical Trial of Fluorine-18 Flurpiridaz Positron Emission Tomography for Evaluation of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Maddahi J; Lazewatsky J; Udelson JE; Berman DS; Beanlands RSB; Heller GV; Bateman TM; Knuuti J; Orlandi C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2020 Jul; 76(4):391-401. PubMed ID: 32703509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Diagnostic accuracy of combined coronary angiography and adenosine stress myocardial perfusion imaging using 320-detector computed tomography: pilot study.
    Nasis A; Ko BS; Leung MC; Antonis PR; Nandurkar D; Wong DT; Kyi L; Cameron JD; Troupis JM; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK
    Eur Radiol; 2013 Jul; 23(7):1812-21. PubMed ID: 23430194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.