These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3519946)

  • 1. Dimensional stability of autopolymerizing acrylic resin impression trays.
    Fehling AW; Hesby RA; Pelleu GB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 May; 55(5):592-7. PubMed ID: 3519946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S; Moore BK; Barco MT; Hovijitra S; Brown DT; Andres CJ
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of custom tray material on the accuracy of master casts.
    Shafa S; Zaree Z; Mosharraf R
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):49-56. PubMed ID: 18784859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dimensional change of acrylic resin tray materials.
    Goldfogel M; Harvey WL; Winter D
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):284-6. PubMed ID: 3903122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Modified custom tray.
    Ortensi L; Strocchi ML
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Aug; 84(2):237-40. PubMed ID: 10946346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Custom impression trays: Part I--Mechanical properties.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Moseley JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Jan; 71(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 8120842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impression material thickness in stock and custom trays.
    Bomberg TJ; Hatch RA; Hoffman W
    J Prosthet Dent; 1985 Aug; 54(2):170-2. PubMed ID: 3903109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of custom tray material type and adhesive drying time on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Brown JS
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(2):129-33. PubMed ID: 8003192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The accuracy of dual-arch impressions: a pilot study.
    Larson TD; Nielsen MA; Brackett WW
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jun; 87(6):625-7. PubMed ID: 12131884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of tray selection on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Gordon GE; Johnson GH; Drennon DG
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Jan; 63(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 2404101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of disinfection of custom tray materials on adhesive properties of several impression material systems.
    Thompson GA; Vermilyea SG; Agar JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Dec; 72(6):651-6. PubMed ID: 7853264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions.
    Ceyhan JA; Johnson GH; Lepe X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Aug; 90(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 12886207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of selected variables on the retention of irreversible hydrocolloid impression material.
    Al-Athel MS
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Sep; 9(6):57-64. PubMed ID: 18784860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A custom impression tray made with the aid of an existing prosthesis: a clinical technique.
    Cain JR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Oct; 86(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 11677532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative method for direct custom tray construction using a visible light-cured resin.
    Castellani D; Basile M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Jul; 78(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 9237149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linear dimensional change of acrylic resins used in the fabrication of custom trays.
    Pagniano RP; Scheid RC; Clowson RL; Dagefoerde RO; Zardiackas LD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1982 Mar; 47(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 7038103
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing effects of tray treatment on the accuracy of dies.
    Tjan AH; Whang SB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1987 Aug; 58(2):175-8. PubMed ID: 3305883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional stability of elastomeric impression materials in custom-made and stock trays.
    Valderhaug J; Fløystrand F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1984 Oct; 52(4):514-7. PubMed ID: 6389833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Effects of different tray types on the resulting impression].
    Biffar R; Bittner B
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1989 Aug; 44(8):624-7. PubMed ID: 2700730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of custom tray material type and surface treatment on the tensile bond strength of an impression material/adhesive system.
    Dixon DL; Breeding LC; Bosser MJ; Nafso AJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(3):303-6. PubMed ID: 8397701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.